|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Mar-07-04 | | Benjamin Lau: Lol, too funny. Not exactly Anand's best game. |
 |
| Mar-08-04 | | vishyanand: lol. i think Rg3 was a slip |
|
Aug-13-04
 | | kevin86: a blunder of blunders!!!!!
59... g3????? |
|
Aug-13-04
 | | azaris: Ah, turns out this wasn't a novelty of Short's after all. |
|
Jan-17-05
| | who: Was this game played blindfolded? |
|
| Jun-28-05 | | Gowe: I think 59.Kf4 it's better. |
|
Jun-28-05
| | who: I assume you mean 59...Kf4 because 59.Kf4 would actually be worse than the move Anand made. |
|
| Jul-04-05 | | Gowe: No, i mean 59.Kf4, so 59...Kxf4 and without white's king the match looks drawish. Some ideas? |
|
Sep-05-05
| | THE pawn: and this game is one of Piket's most notable games???? ...wow, I'm missing something. |
|
Sep-05-05
 | | chessgames.com: Yes you are--you are missing the explanation "What is this?" next to the notable games feature: ChessGames.com Help |
|
| Sep-05-05 | | Norman Glaides: Unlucky. |
|
Sep-05-05
| | aw1988: "Monaco" and blunders usually mean blindfold, although there is also a rapid section. |
|
Sep-05-05
| | dac1990: Wow, this almost tops the disaster that was Short vs Krasenkow, 2004. |
|
Sep-05-05
| | aw1988: I don't think anything could top that... |
|
Sep-06-05
| | THE pawn: <chessgames> Well, I still do not see why it's a notable game. He won because of someone else's blunder. And the game is only in two game collections. |
|
| Sep-23-05 | | mego: ohhhhh ... what a blunder !!!!!!! |
|
Oct-11-05
| | Averageguy: In the rook endgame when Anand was two pawns up I was beggining to think how the hell can white have won this!?(I had looked at the little result thing under the date of game). And now I know!! |
|
Feb-08-06
| | McCool: 59 ...Rg3???? WOW
|
|
Dec-22-06
| | Tacticstudent: what? i just can't seem to believe it. how anand could've played 49- ... Rg3??? it's almost impossible that a elite player like anand just've made such a blunder! |
|
| Jan-05-07 | | Total Blunder: <Tacticstudent: what? i just can't seem to believe it. (...) it's almost impossible that a elite player like anand just've made such a blunder!> Well... and he wasn`t matching for the humankind title... THAT is what makes we different from CPUs (to blunder). And that is why I think what is really human isn`t the "skill" to predict the best move, but to FEEL it. Anand just felt the wrong one. |
|
| Jan-27-07 | | beatles fan: Give the guy a break. When you play as many games as he has, you are bound to slip up sometimes. Haven't you dropped a piece? I sure have |
|
| Jan-27-07 | | nimzo knight: Ha ha ..... funny. Anand was definitely playing blindfolded. Or Piket knows a dirty secret about him ;). |
|
Dec-09-07
| | Tacticstudent: <Total Blunder> You are talking about intuition, and generally (99,9%) Super GMs' intuition don't tell them to put the Rook in a square it can be taken by the king but on an active and danger-free square (blunders) . Anand did not 'feel' the wrong one, he simply made a terrible blunder. And, yes, it's a great advantage that programs like Fritz and Rybka have upon mankind, because even in a 0,05 second/move game they won't play moves like this. |
|
Dec-09-07
 | | anandrulez: Anand is not the best blindfold player around , he sometimes makes silly errors which can rarely be seen by players like Kramnik and Moro in blindfold chess. Same about Topalov he is also shaky blindfold player . Some people just have tremendous concentration . |
|
| Oct-16-08 | | gazzawhite: But Anand should have known exactly where the white king was, because White's last move was a king move. |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
