chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Adolf Anderssen vs Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritsky
"The Immortal Game" (game of the day Sep-05-07)
London (1851)  ·  King's Gambit: Accepted. Bishop's Gambit Bryan Countergambit (C33)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 277 times; par: 37 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Anderssen/Kieseritzky games
sac: 11.Rg1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 17 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-08-14  LIFE Master AJ: What really bugs me ... GM R. Huebner gave many question marks to the play of both players.

Moves like 8...Qg5! (Which is also the first choice of several engines, to include Fritz 13..)

Mar-08-14  Granny O Doul: I remember Fischer on God, sort of. He said first of all that he didn't think anyone could beat God, but that He (Fischer) could probably draw with white.
Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <LIFE Master AJ: What really bugs me ... GM R. Huebner gave many question marks to the play of both players. Moves like 8...Qg5! (Which is also the first choice of several engines, to include Fritz 13..)>

You've mentioned ...Qg5 a few times. Any other Huebner annotations you disagree with? Any you agree with?

Black got mated in 23 moves, so he probably screwed up somewhere.

Mar-08-14  N0B0DY: knows the better annotator.
Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: fyg: Hübner gave move-assessment symbols for the following moves:

7.d3 (?)
7...Nh5 (?)
8.Nh4?
9...c6 (?)
10.g4?
10...Nf6 (?)
11...cxb5?
17.Nd5 (?)
18.Bd6?

Mar-08-14  john barleycorn: The <LIFE annotator> is not too specific on Qg5. Except "the engines say so". His own input as a "master" = zero

Just had a look at Reti's "Die modernen Ideen im Schachspiel" and Tartakower's "500 master games of chess" where : 8....Qg5 "this simultaneous attack on two pieces proves illusory. Better would be 8...g5 9.Nf5 Qg6"

The first mention of 8....g6 that I found is in von Gottschall's book on Anderssen.

However, he is getting more feedback here, than his webpages and videos have viewers. I am under the impression he produces third rated stuff on purpose to get any kind of attention...

Mar-08-14  john barleycorn: Even Kieseritzky had his doubts about Qg5:
<ceci n'est pas le coupe juste>

http://books.google.de/books?id=YCg...

Mar-08-14  LIFE Master AJ: <keypusher> I am working on completely redoing my annotations for the game ... I shall post it when I am done. (I literally began this project last November. First, it got sidelined by the World Champ. match between Carlsen and Anand.)

I continue to work on it.

I literally have done around 30-50 DPA's. (And tons of sliding.)

I don't believe in work done quickly. Too many GM's (and others, like KC) who crank out something in just a few minutes, their stuff isn't worth even looking at twice.

Mar-09-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: < LIFE Master AJ: <keypusher> (I literally began this project last November...

I literally have done around 30-50 DPA's. (And tons of sliding.)>

Literally, eh? You mean as in <not metaphorically>.

Mar-09-14  LIFE Master AJ: I am fascinated by the engines.

Remember - when I first came up ... the late 1960's and early 1970's ... computers that played chess were just a pipe dream.

Every time I subject a game to close scrutiny, it finds something new. (Unless someone else has already subjected that game to deep engine analysis.)

Mar-10-14  TheFocus: I am surprised that <keypusher> was the only one to see I was being sarcastic about Steinitz.
Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.lifemasteraj.com/old_af-...

For the handful of people that have asked me, I am working on an update to this game. I am only doing a little at a time, so it might be awhile (2-3 months?) before I finish.

Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: <<I am surprised that <keypusher> was the only one to see I was being sarcastic about Steinitz.>>

Well you got me. (Totally!) Reeled me right in.

In person, I can detect sarcasm or joking. But in print, I have a much harder time telling when someone might be pulling my chain. (You may call me gullible and naïve, it would not be the first time that has happened. Probably won't be the last time, either.)

Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: < <Pulo y Gata:> Betcha it'll be one hella fight to get to ride the cursed machine first.)<<<<>>>> >

One sci-fi writer - I forget which one - had a theory ... as you traveled back in time, you would lose any knowledge that was gained in the future ... that the time stream would <automatically?> strip you of any knowledge that did not belong to that era.

I.E. If you took a ride back to the days of the first stone age ... in the earliest days of man ... when you stepped off the time machine, you would be dumb as a brick and not even remember/know how to make fire, much less operate your time machine.

Mar-23-14  Pulo y Gata: I have a theory that if one will travel back in time you would become what you were at that time: an ejaculation, a mote on someone's eye, a dust, an idea... This obviously is what happened to advanced sentient beings who attempted to travel back in time. This make travelling to the future more alluring since you can chance on a better self in the future. But not always, because you can also be something else: a dead body, a memory, an echo, a dust, a footnote...
Mar-23-14  LIFE Master AJ: You were probably just a speck of food (on a tooth) in a T-Rex's mouth ...
Mar-23-14  LIFE Master AJ: Or ... in its stool.
Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: Or as cannonfodder for 1800's

http://schach.chess.com/livechess/g...

Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: <LIFE Master AJ: ...
when you stepped off the time machine, you would be dumb as a brick>

You succeeded without the equipment...

Mar-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Maybe he's from the future?
Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: <OhioChessFan: Maybe he's from the future?>

Actually, it doesn't matter in this specific case:

0-0 = 0+0 = 0

Jul-01-14  sergeidave: Did you know that it was actually Black who won this amazing game?? :) http://books.google.com/books?id=jC...
Jul-01-14  sergeidave: Also, from that same source, it appears that the moves ...3 through 5, actually happened in a slightly different order... Then the rest of the games plays as notated above.
Jul-25-14  m.okun: To discuss this game from positions of today at least it's ridiculous.
Feb-25-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Who thought up the brilliant pun for this game? And who voted for it?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 17)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 17 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
The Immortal Game
from Chessmen's favorite games by Chessmen
samiul93's favorite games
by samiul93
Immortal
by scholes
max05's favorite games
by max05
immortal game
from top8's favorite games by top8
tedster's favorite games 3
by tedster
relue's favorite games
by relue
withingrace's favorite games
by withingrace
Nicholson's favorite games
by Nicholson
Anderssen, Adolf
by belak
The Immortal Game
from The Greatest Games Ever Played by chessman95
Immortal
from First collection by pcvandelay
4 1star final checkmate -the immortal game
from Sharpen Your Tactics 1- 350 by Sharpen Your Tactics
theArtist's favorite games
by theArtist
prosoccer's favorite games
by prosoccer
The immortal game.
from fref's favorite games by fref
Ercan's favorite games I
by Ercan
THE IMMORTAL GAME
from DIVINE FAIRYZ AMAZING CHESS COLLECTION # 1 by DiViNe FaiRyz
Immortal game, white sacrificing almost everything to mate!
from MJCB favorite games by MJCB
The Immortal
from Ten greatest chess games of all time by greatdane
plus 503 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies