chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]

register now - it's free!
Adolf Anderssen vs Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritsky
"The Immortal Game" (game of the day Sep-05-07)
London (1851)  ·  King's Gambit: Accepted. Bishop's Gambit Bryan Countergambit (C33)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 267 times; par: 37 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Anderssen/Kieseritzky games
sac: 11.Rg1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 17 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-07-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Well, I promised Richard Branson he could go on the initial flight.

It's his money that is footing the bill.

Mar-08-14  LIFE Master AJ: What really bugs me ... GM R. Huebner gave many question marks to the play of both players.

Moves like 8...Qg5! (Which is also the first choice of several engines, to include Fritz 13..)

Mar-08-14  Granny O Doul: I remember Fischer on God, sort of. He said first of all that he didn't think anyone could beat God, but that He (Fischer) could probably draw with white.
Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <LIFE Master AJ: What really bugs me ... GM R. Huebner gave many question marks to the play of both players. Moves like 8...Qg5! (Which is also the first choice of several engines, to include Fritz 13..)>

You've mentioned ...Qg5 a few times. Any other Huebner annotations you disagree with? Any you agree with?

Black got mated in 23 moves, so he probably screwed up somewhere.

Mar-08-14  N0B0DY: knows the better annotator.
Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: fyg: Hübner gave move-assessment symbols for the following moves:

7.d3 (?)
7...Nh5 (?)
8.Nh4?
9...c6 (?)
10.g4?
10...Nf6 (?)
11...cxb5?
17.Nd5 (?)
18.Bd6?

Mar-08-14  john barleycorn: The <LIFE annotator> is not too specific on Qg5. Except "the engines say so". His own input as a "master" = zero

Just had a look at Reti's "Die modernen Ideen im Schachspiel" and Tartakower's "500 master games of chess" where : 8....Qg5 "this simultaneous attack on two pieces proves illusory. Better would be 8...g5 9.Nf5 Qg6"

The first mention of 8....g6 that I found is in von Gottschall's book on Anderssen.

However, he is getting more feedback here, than his webpages and videos have viewers. I am under the impression he produces third rated stuff on purpose to get any kind of attention...

Mar-08-14  john barleycorn: Even Kieseritzky had his doubts about Qg5:
<ceci n'est pas le coupe juste>

http://books.google.de/books?id=YCg...

Mar-08-14  LIFE Master AJ: <keypusher> I am working on completely redoing my annotations for the game ... I shall post it when I am done. (I literally began this project last November. First, it got sidelined by the World Champ. match between Carlsen and Anand.)

I continue to work on it.

I literally have done around 30-50 DPA's. (And tons of sliding.)

I don't believe in work done quickly. Too many GM's (and others, like KC) who crank out something in just a few minutes, their stuff isn't worth even looking at twice.

Mar-09-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: < LIFE Master AJ: <keypusher> (I literally began this project last November...

I literally have done around 30-50 DPA's. (And tons of sliding.)>

Literally, eh? You mean as in <not metaphorically>.

Mar-09-14  LIFE Master AJ: I am fascinated by the engines.

Remember - when I first came up ... the late 1960's and early 1970's ... computers that played chess were just a pipe dream.

Every time I subject a game to close scrutiny, it finds something new. (Unless someone else has already subjected that game to deep engine analysis.)

Mar-10-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: I am surprised that <keypusher> was the only one to see I was being sarcastic about Steinitz.
Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.lifemasteraj.com/old_af-...

For the handful of people that have asked me, I am working on an update to this game. I am only doing a little at a time, so it might be awhile (2-3 months?) before I finish.

Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: <<I am surprised that <keypusher> was the only one to see I was being sarcastic about Steinitz.>>

Well you got me. (Totally!) Reeled me right in.

In person, I can detect sarcasm or joking. But in print, I have a much harder time telling when someone might be pulling my chain. (You may call me gullible and naïve, it would not be the first time that has happened. Probably won't be the last time, either.)

Mar-22-14  LIFE Master AJ: < <Pulo y Gata:> Betcha it'll be one hella fight to get to ride the cursed machine first.)<<<<>>>> >

One sci-fi writer - I forget which one - had a theory ... as you traveled back in time, you would lose any knowledge that was gained in the future ... that the time stream would <automatically?> strip you of any knowledge that did not belong to that era.

I.E. If you took a ride back to the days of the first stone age ... in the earliest days of man ... when you stepped off the time machine, you would be dumb as a brick and not even remember/know how to make fire, much less operate your time machine.

Mar-23-14  Pulo y Gata: I have a theory that if one will travel back in time you would become what you were at that time: an ejaculation, a mote on someone's eye, a dust, an idea... This obviously is what happened to advanced sentient beings who attempted to travel back in time. This make travelling to the future more alluring since you can chance on a better self in the future. But not always, because you can also be something else: a dead body, a memory, an echo, a dust, a footnote...
Mar-23-14  LIFE Master AJ: You were probably just a speck of food (on a tooth) in a T-Rex's mouth ...
Mar-23-14  LIFE Master AJ: Or ... in its stool.
Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: Or as cannonfodder for 1800's

http://schach.chess.com/livechess/g...

Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: <LIFE Master AJ: ...
when you stepped off the time machine, you would be dumb as a brick>

You succeeded without the equipment...

Mar-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Maybe he's from the future?
Mar-23-14  john barleycorn: <OhioChessFan: Maybe he's from the future?>

Actually, it doesn't matter in this specific case:

0-0 = 0+0 = 0

Jul-01-14  sergeidave: Did you know that it was actually Black who won this amazing game?? :) http://books.google.com/books?id=jC...
Jul-01-14  sergeidave: Also, from that same source, it appears that the moves ...3 through 5, actually happened in a slightly different order... Then the rest of the games plays as notated above.
Jul-25-14  m.okun: To discuss this game from positions of today at least it's ridiculous.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 17)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 17 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Immortal Game
from Classics by PhilipTheGeek
La inmortal
from Grandes juegos de grandes jugadores by jonico
Kings in the Centre
by Checkmate4327
pg.117-120
from The Big Book of Chess by Penguincw
The Immortal Game!!! How to win when you're 21 units down
from WhiteRook48's favorite games by WhiteRook48
The Immortal Game
from al's favorite games by alspookyd
61_Double rook sacrifices
by whiteshark
Hidden Skillz's favorite games
by Hidden Skillz
Anderssen! (May 2008)
from Notable games - my Playthrough list by trumvirvel
Immortal
from dolcehavana's favorite games by dolcehavana
1851 ! The inmortal game !!!
from jaime gallegos' favorite games by jaime gallegos
1 The Mating Attack (1-35)
from Beheim, M _Chess With the Masters_ NY: ARCO 1963 by biglo
"The Immortal Game"
from Immortal Games by Oliveira
The Immortal Game
from FSR's favorite games by FSR
Favorites Games
by RodicH
The Immortal Game
from Popularity Counts! by dac1990
krzychu's favorite games
by krzychu
I couldn't ignore it, could I?
from Caïssa's dream world by nikolaas
The Immortal Game
from Anderssen's GOTD by drlah
theArtist's favorite games
by theArtist
plus 498 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies