chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Paul Morphy vs Adolf Anderssen
Anderssen - Morphy (1858), Paris FRA, rd 3, Dec-22
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 124 times; par: 27 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [16550 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more Morphy/Anderssen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-20-04  Bobsterman3000: <notyetagm> I like your description of Anderssen's f-file problems. That characterization could prove helpful to me when when attempting to do quick piece evaluations. Somebody hand this man a GM norm or two...
Apr-20-04  Vischer: I got this one in half a second. These puzzles are getting to be so easy *I* can get them fast!
Apr-20-04  ruylopez900: <notyetagm> Good explanation, certainly makes the solution seem a whole lot simpler :D
Apr-20-04  Minor Piece Activity: Easy puzzle! =D Maybe chessgames.com could one day make two "puzzles of the day?" One hard one for people with too much time on their hands and one for players like me. =D
Apr-20-04  marcusantoinerome: In Seargent's book on Morphy, he states that "Anderssen shows none of his high talent in this game." He also notes that the game took 2 hours.

As stated above, they played without clocks, but did record the total time elapsed.

Wonderful play by Morphy!

Apr-21-04  masterwojtek: Awesome game! (But you must study it carefully to see its beauty)
Apr-21-04  Vischer: , Minor Piece Activity: Easy puzzle! =D Maybe chessgames.com could one day make two "puzzles of the day?" One hard one for people with too much time on their hands and one for players like me. =D > that is a good idea.
Jan-26-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_h... Here's a link analysis by Silman
Feb-24-06  DeepBlade: Thanks <Timothy Glenn Forney>!

The annotation was really usefull for me. I also begun to understand Morphy's view on chess.

Feb-27-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: No problem,I love analyizing games too. Check this out:A J Mestel vs Gufeld, 1986
Jul-24-06  waddayaplay: Some analysis to weigh up the Morphy-centric notes of Silman. Comments are welcome.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.d4 Nxd4?!

<
Leads to equality. Other moves would have given black the initiative:

..exd in Bird vs Anderssen, 1862 0-1 and Fressinet vs Kramnik, 2002 0-1

or ..Nxe4 Showalter vs Pillsbury, 1898 0-1 >

5.Nxd4 exd4

<
as Silman points out, 5..c6 is also playable
>

6.e5 c6

<
also playable is 6..Nd5 and 6..c5!?
>

7.O-O cxb5 8.Bg5 Be7 9.exf6 Bxf6 10.Re1+

<

>

..Kf8 11.Bxf6 Qxf6 12.c3!

<
Probably best. Yet no more than
>

..d5?!

<
like Silman says, the bishop becomes passive. 12...b6 is a serious alternative. >

13.cxd4 Be6 14.Nc3 a6 15.Re5 Rd8 16.Qb3 Qe7 17.Rae1 g5?

<
With the textmove, black creates a weakness which makes defence very difficult.

Better is 17..Qd6. According to Silman this is refuted by 18.a4 b4 19.Na2 a5 20.Nc1 "when the threatened Nc1d3-c5 maneuver is very hard for Black to meet.". However, in that line black should play 20..g6 and the position is defensible. Black will continue with Kg7 and Rhe8 to complete his development. A white Nc5 is answered by Bc8. >

18.Qd1?!

<
Ne2 is more accurate, because it prevents any eventual Kg7 on account of Ng3, while the queen is also more powerful on the queenside -- if black for example responded 18..Qf6 then both 19.a4 and 19.Qa3+ would be good alternatives.

>

Qf6 19.R1e3?!

<
Gives black chances to consolidate. A more thorough method is to move the knight to the kingside, and to create a weakness on the queenside with a4, Qd3, etc

For example, 19.a4 b4 20.Ne2 (preparing Qd2) h6 21.Ng3 Rc8 22.Nh5 Qg6 23.f4 and black will have difficulties defending all his weak pawns and his exposed king.

>

Rg8??

<
Perhaps Anderssen didn't believe in the defence, but objectively after 19..Kg7 there is much play left. Black would then proceed with something like Qg6, h6, f5, Bf7 and Rhe8 to consolidate. >

20.Rxe6 1-0

Jul-05-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: Does anyone else think Anderssen should've played on(Q+N v.R+R)?
Nov-15-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.33.

Morphy 1 mistake:
19.R1e3 0.12 (19.Ne2 0.56)

Anderssen 2 mistakes:
17...g5 0.65 (17...g6 0.13)
19...Rg8 3.33 (19...Rd6 0.12)

Feb-07-08  HNP: "An easy trap to see,maybe Anderssen was awed so much by Morphy,that he was attacked by panic or chess blindness."

Hardly. This was the third game of the match and Anderssen led 1.5 - 0.5.

Jan-14-09  WhiteRook48: but then Morphy won a lot of the others.
Aug-12-10  sevenseaman: At the end the game pivots quickly in favor of White but do note the preparation. The tailing R has to be on e3.
Jan-13-11  Tigranny: No offense, but what caused Anderssen to play much worse than he did in the Immortal and Evergreen games?
Feb-23-11  Llawdogg: No offense, but the Immortal Game was not played against Morphy. Morphy simply wouldn't allow Anderssen any opportunities to attack. And Anderssen acknowledged as much.
Feb-25-11  M.D. Wilson: Morphy was much better than Anderssen, but the match result was really lopsided for a player of Anderssen's strength.
Jul-15-11  lemaire90: After 6 ... c6, Lowenthal notes that it was a weak move. That exact move was Houdini's suggestion...

The only read blunder was 19. ... Rg8, Instead Anderssen should have played Kg7, getting out of the skewer that is available after 20. ... fxe6 21. Rf3.

Feb-22-14  tranquilsimplicity: Morphy is sooo..good that he makes it look easy! #
Mar-20-14  RookFile: Had Anderssen played a better 17th move, this would have been a great struggle. Should he play ...Qd6, or maybe ...h5 with the idea of ...Rh6? It's too bad, the game was just getting interesting.
Nov-24-14  yurikvelo: http://pastebin.com/49nH3Wua

this game Stockfish analysis

Oct-11-15  The Kings Domain: Poor 6th move by Anderssen, perhaps a flawed opening experiment or overconfidence on his part. He sure payed terribly for it.
Feb-19-16  yurikvelo: <After 6 ... c6, Lowenthal notes that it was a weak move> 6. ..c6 + Nd5 (or Nd5 + c6 transposition) is best (and the only good) move according to SF7@D=38 and K9.3@D=32

Next move 6. ..Ne4 or Ng8 is a gap worse

<Poor 6th move by Anderssen> best 6th move, it is poor only because followed by 7...cxb5?, not 7...Nd5/Ng8

<8... Be7 The only correct reply Lowenthal> also 8... d5

<Instead Anderssen should have played Kg7> Rd6 is much better than Kg7+g4 (or g4+Kg7 transposition)

After Rd6: QN vs RRB is very hard for white to advance and a lot of possibilities for mistake (for both sides!). If black was modern engine I forecast white could even draw or lose. http://pastebin.com/49nH3Wua

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
point's favorite Morphy games
by point
Noted-n-Notable-Games of Morphy-n-Staunton
by saveyougod
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65) 1-0 Notes by Lowenthal
from yP-K4 Games by fredthebear
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65) 1-0 Notes by Lowenthal
from Rounders I Rearranged by fredthebear
Ruy Lopez without 3 ...a6
by Cannon Fodder
20 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection II by PinkLedDoor
All Lopez players must study is brilliant game.
from Best Chess Games of All Time by JoseTigranTalFischer
Match Anderssen!
by amadeus
A pin in offing
from sevenseaman's favorite games by sevenseaman
redish15's favorite games
by redish15
20.? (April 20, 2004)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Game 43
from Chess Secrets - Power Play (McDonald) by Incremental
20.? (Tuesday, April 20)
from Puzzle of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
nice games
by had2x
tactics1
by tactics


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC