chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Gustav Richard Neumann vs Adolf Anderssen
Berlin (1864), Berlin GER
King's Gambit: Accepted. Philidor Gambit Schultz Variation (C38)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 81 more G Neumann/Anderssen games
sac: 20.Nxe6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: 10.g3 is a strange move. What is whites response to 10. ...g4 ? if 11.Nh4 fxg3 12.Qxg3 Nxd4 puts black up two pawns.
Mar-03-05  sneaky pete: <InspiredByMorphy> If 10... g4 11.e5 .. followed by 12.Qh7 .. with attacking chances. It was actually Neumann (white) vs Anderssen, according to Pickards book "The Chess Games of Adolph (sic) Anderssen".

10.g3 g4 makes a later Nh4 .. possible, as in the line given by Pickard (= von Gotschall): 10... g4 11.e5 Bg7 12.Qh7 Kf8 13.Nh4 .. threat 14.Ng6+ .. but after 13... d5 black should win. Black might also play 10... g4 11.e5 d5 12.Qh7 dxc4 with a clear advantage.

Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Actually, <sneakypete> it's not certain Neumann was White here. Neue Berliner Schachzeitung,1864,p232 has Anderssen playing White. This tracks with 10 other Anderssen-Neumann games I have (with the same opening). In each case, Anderssen was White. Not conclusive, but I think this gives greater weight to NBz being right. From what I've read, the Pickard books are short on documentation, so I'm a bit skeptical.
Sep-29-14  john barleycorn: Gottschall's book about Anderssen has it as game 330 with Neumann having White.

10.g3 gets an exclamation mark:

10.g3! Nh6 (even after 10...g4 11.e5 White has a strong attack e.g. 11....Bg7 12.Qh7 Kf8 13.Nh4 Nh6 14.Bxf4 etc.)(Gottschall)

Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Thanks <john barleycorn> for your feedback. I do not wish to appear stubborn, but Pickard could have copied von Gottschall's citation thus propagating the error (if it was such). As mentioned before, Anderssen invariably played White in this line. I can only find one instance (Kolisch-Anderssen,1860) where Anderssen defended the Black side in this particular variation (e.g. through move 6). Also, Anderssen played the same move (7.Qd3) multiple times (with White) against Neumann.

When you have conflicting sources, it seems a good idea to see if the game would logically follow a player's tendencies/preferences. I'm familiar the notion of "using your opponent's ideas against him", but those days (when theory was in the developmental stage) I'm not sure that is a strong possibility. Consequently, I remain very skeptical that Neumann had White.

Sep-29-14  john barleycorn: In the set of games as given in v. Gottschall's book Neumann had the White in RL and KG's while Anderssen had white in the Evansgambits. And v. Gottschall remarks once in a while "Neumann is fighting with Anderssen's weapons".
Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Thanks <john barleycorn>! That certainly sheds a different light on things. Unfortunately, I do/did not have a copy of von Gottschall's book. Will have to get a copy!
Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: One addition question/comment <john barleycorn>. Was this the set of games played in Berlin? (They played another set in Breslau). I ask because Neue Berliner Schachzeitung,1864,p276 has Anderssen playing White in another KG (C37, 24 moves, at Berlin). By the way, <cg> has that game listed with Anderssen playing White. If von Gottschall's remark is correct (consistent), then it would seem Neumann was White.
Sep-29-14  john barleycorn: Played in Berlin, July 1864. And the above game is from that time according to v. Gottschall. Then there are listed another 28 games played in Berlin, April 1865 and 25 games played in Berlin April 1866.
Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: When you say "the above game" <john barleycorn>, are you referring to the C38 game we were discussing earlier? In my last post (above), I was asking about a different game (C37). By the way, Neue Berliner Schachzeitung also gives July 1864 for both games. I was trying to reconcile Anderssen being White in the C37 game vis-a-vis your statement that Neumann had White in all the KG games (in that set).
Sep-29-14  john barleycorn: "The game above" means this page the C38.

There is a Muzio Gambit with 24 moves (24.Rf6 Ne4 and white resigns) from July 1864 and it says Anderssen was White. I have overlooked that one in my previous post. Sorry for that.

Sep-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Thanks <john barleycorn>. Glad to hear von Gottschall and Neue Berliner Schachzeitung agree on that one. I still have reservations about the C38 game, but the comments you listed from von Gottschall are persuasive.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Philidor Gambit Schultz Variation
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takattack
C38 King's Gambit Accepted [White]
by chess.master
Philidor Gambit Schultz Variation
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC