chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Etienne Bacrot vs Liviu Dieter Nisipeanu
Balatonbereny GM (1996), Balatonbereny HUN, rd 6, Jun-??
Benko Gambit: Zaitsev Variation. Nescafe Frappe Attack (A57)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 41 times; par: 29 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Bacrot/Nisipeanu games
sac: 16...Nxf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-25-04  Lawrence: <florin>, welcome to the site! Which "spart" is that?
Jun-25-04  AgentRgent: <rafaelluiz> White went bad with 5. Nc3 and even worse with 6. e4. If you're going to take on b5, you'd better have the guts to take on a6, "In for a penny, in for a pound". Positionally allowing black to trade an A pawn for a C pawn is bad enough, but allowing the e7-b4 pawn chain is just a gift to a Benko player.
Jun-25-04  PinkPanther: <AgentRgent>
Are you a fool? The Nc3 line in the Benko Gambit is PERFECTLY respectable, it's just that after Nisipeanu plays b4 a very sharp variation is entered that Bacrot came out on the losing side of. But as I already stated, there is nothing at all wrong the the Nc3 line.
Jun-25-04  Lawrence: <Junior 8> suggests that White's 19.♕b3 (19.♘f3) and 20.h3 (♕xd5) were weak but the real freefall started with 21.♘xe4? Better would have been 21.♘b5, though even the latter gets an eval of -1.06 (2 min. analysis).
Jun-25-04  AgentRgent: Am I a fool? quite possibly, but I'm also not wrong..

Opening Explorer 5. Nc3
69 games
31.9% won for white
20.3% drawn
47.8% won for black

5. Nc3 is Whites weakest choice against the Benko.
Perhaps you're thinking of 6. Nc3 (after 5. bxa6 Bxa6) which is the main line and perfectly acceptable.

Jun-25-04  PinkPanther: Only 69 games are in the database for this variation, that's hardly enough of a sample to gain an accurate depiction of how sound Nc3 actually is.
Jun-27-04  AgentRgent: According to Chesslab.com's 536 games featuring 5. Nc3 from 1991-Present the scores are: White won 36% Black won 45% Draw 19% As opposed to 5. bxa6 which scores: W 38% B 30% D 32%.
Jun-28-04  Shadout Mapes: Isn't this Sneaky's preferred line against the Benko? The NesFrappe(tm) Attack?
Jun-28-04  Shadout Mapes: <AgentRegent> What do you think of this: A Schmied vs Jan Rosenberg, 2001 ?
Jun-28-04  themindset: pink panther, why are you so abusive? chill out dude.
Jun-28-04  Ziggurat: 5. Nc3 can be rather unpleasant to meet for a Benko player (I used to be one myself). It may allow Black to equalize with best play, but he has to tread carefully as there are some pitfalls.
Jun-28-04  AgentRgent: <Shadout Mapes: What do you think of this: A Schmied vs Jan Rosenberg, 2001?> comments here: A Schmied vs Jan Rosenberg, 2001
Jul-02-04  guyk: against the benko i enjoy 4. f3
very strong!
Jul-02-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <Isn't this Sneaky's preferred line against the Benko? The NesFrappe(tm) Attack?> It's a walk down the road that leads to the attack but here White wimps out and doesn't play the 2-pawn gambit which is the Nescafe Frappe Attack.

The improvement in the opening is this: instead of the sane-yet-boring plan of Nf3/O-O instead try 8.Bc4 g6 9.e5! dxe5 10.d6! exd6 11.Bg5 where White has such a burning initiative that requires a whole pale of water just to cool him down.

Jul-02-04  AgentRgent: <Sneaky: instead try 8.Bc4 g6> against 8. Bc4 8...Nbd7 is better than 8...g6.
Sep-14-04  RationalKing: <Lawrence> "L-a spart" means in romanian was destroyed
Sep-14-04  Lawrence: <RationalKing>, thanks. Are both you and <florin> Romanian, then?
Sep-14-04  samvega: <Lawrence> Did Junior not comment on 16.Nd2? This move seems to justify the sac -- or is it played to provoke it on the assumption the sac isn't sound?
Sep-15-04  Rowson: I haven't been this confused since i tried to understand Tal's games.
Sep-15-04  clocked: <AgentRgent> opening statistics don't make you right (or wrong).

Black's diagonal strength is impressive. Bg4 or Ba6, Bd4 or Bh6, and Qh4 or Qa5

Sep-15-04  Lawrence: <samvega>, Junior 8 considers 16.Nd2 a tad inferior to 16.h3 but both of them get an = sign. 16.....Nxf2 is spectacular, and probably jolted Bacrot psychologically (unless, as you say, he was purposely trying to provoke it), but 16.....f5 is Junior's first choice. Once again, both moves get an = sign, and the evaluation is f5 -0.25, Nxf2 -0.02 In other words, 16.Nd2 is not a bad move, and 16.....Nxf2 is not a winning one. (5 min. searches)
Sep-15-04  Lawrence: <samvega>, oops, left Junior running while I did some other stuff and now, after 35 minutes, it thinks that 16.....Nxf2 is a bit stronger than 16.....f5 (though -0.19 versus -0.14 really means they're both the same).
Sep-15-04  clocked: <Lawrence> I take back my statement that it is winning, but I don't trust Junior's eval without going deeper.
Sep-15-04  samvega: <Lawrence> thx
<clocked> I trust computer evaluation over my own simply because I'm not a strong player. The thing I dislike about computer analysis is that computers (at the moment) aren't very pedagogical. At any rate, it seems to me that 16..Nxf2 is in a sense an obvious move, while 20..dxe4 is more "shocking".
Nov-28-07  litlepawn: Hi from JPN : registered just now after reading articles in this site for about 3 months . just one question : is there anyone here who actualy uses his/her brains to analys games here , or is everyone using machines ? 8 years old from JPN . Ps ;if I sound rude I apologize , and 4give my my bad speling and grammer , my english is 5 months old :-)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
I don't liviu anymore.
from Benko Gambits by Dillinger
olof's VERY BEST
by wwm
23 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IX by wwall
chessmoon's favorite games
by chessmoon
Benko Gambit: Zaitsev. 5.Nc3 Nescafe Frappe Attack (A57) 0-
from Green Tea and Toast for Fredthebear's Ghost by fredthebear
23 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IX by PinkLedDoor
A nice attacking Benko gambit
from PhilFeeley's Favourite Games by PhilFeeley


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC