< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
|Feb-04-12|| ||ajax333221: did this game actually happened?
I am disappointed
|Feb-05-12|| ||thomastonk: <ajax333221: did this game actually happened?> Yes, it was part of match.|
But why you are disappointed: it was Bird who lost. He was an amateur player who had a longer break from chess, and when the match was stopped (because of Bird's urgent business reasons) he was only slightly behind his strong opponent (+5, -7, =5).
|Mar-22-12|| ||SAM WOLFE: It might be possible for Black to survive after 4...Nf6 5.Nxf6+,Qxf6, and maybe even to have a reasonably playable game, but I think 4...Be7 followed by 5...Nf6 would have spared him a lot of problems. Black's key error was in failing to defend f6 properly before he put a knight onto it;protecting f6 with the Q was a bad idea.|
|May-28-12|| ||LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:
Steinitz vs Bird, 1866.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF STEINITZ.
Your score: 15 (par = 17)
|Jul-09-12|| ||The Last Straw: I think 8...Qg4 gets a question mark.|
|Mar-21-13|| ||ACEchess: True. 6...h6 was required to prevent 7.g5.|
|Apr-27-13|| ||PawnSac: <The Last Straw: I think 8...Qg4 gets a question mark.>|
Lets put it this way..
After Qg4 the queen is lost. Qa5+ instead gave black a little more squirming room, but the error came on move 6. Black had to play either Qd8 or h6
|May-11-13|| ||Mendrys: My guess is that when he decided on 8...Qg4 Bird had expected or considered 10. Rg2 Qxh3 instead of the text. In this case he may be doing fine, at least according to Houdini but I would not be feeling the least bit comfortable being up 2 pawns in this position:|
click for larger view
|Jul-18-13|| ||Zhbugnoimt: Bird got creamed! Really a terrible game for him|
|Jul-18-13|| ||Zhbugnoimt: Nice how he got his queen trapped so early on|
|Sep-27-13|| ||tuskerking: miniature or mikniestature :D|
|Mar-20-14|| ||Phony Benoni: There's a famous quote from Bird that goes something like this: "Place the contents of the chessboard into your hat, shake thoroughly, drop them onto the chessboard from a height of two feet--and you have the style of Steinitz."|
Much the same could be said for the mind of Bird. Some days, he could produce games of great artistry and power. Other days, he goes into the weird and wonderful byways nobody else dares to explore. He may come out on his shield rather than carrying it, but but it's always fascinating.
And some days he just plays like a total beginner.
i would be willing to believe he played 11...Nxd4 deliberately to set up the cute finish. There seems little other reason to prolong the game for even a single move.
And just to highlight the Enigma that is Bird, he won the next two games of the match: Bird vs Steinitz, 1866 and Steinitz vs Bird, 1866. Go figure.
|Mar-20-14|| ||An Englishman: Good Evening: Although I have never had any respect for 3...dxe4 in the French, objectively the first truly bad move was 4...Nf6?; 5.Nxf6!,Qxf6; 6.Nf3, and the results in the CG database support my contention.|
|Mar-20-14|| ||morfishine: One of the great mysteries of the universe, right up there with Easter Island, Stonehenge and the Pyramids, is how such poor chess games like this get selected for "Game of The Day"|
|Mar-20-14|| ||Once: I think the clue here is the date. This was played in 1866 when the French defence was barely 32 years old. It was first played seriously in 1834 in a correspondence game between Paris and London - hence the name.|
When this game was played in 1866, Players of the black pieces were still experimenting with ways to meet each of the main white moves after 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5.
We also need to remember that Akiba Rubinstein who did much to popularise and develop the 4. Nxe4 line (aka the Rubinstein variation) wasn't born until 1882 and didn't learn how to play chess until 1898.
In other words, this game is Racquel Welch in a deer skin bikini in One Million Years BC, it's a Ford Model T, it's Harold Lauder or Charlie Chaplin. It's one of Thomas Edison's less successful light bulb prototypes.
It's a little bit of 'istory. Of course, today we can scoff about black not knowing that that the Rubinstein doesn't really sit well with early queen moves by black, but that would be a bit like criticising Star Trek for not predicting the internet.
|Mar-20-14|| ||Castleinthesky: Very nice miniature-"A Bird On A Wire"?|
|Mar-20-14|| ||kevin86: Bird-brained opening.|
|Mar-20-14|| ||ndg2: Lol, I had exactly the same position after 6.Nf3 last Sunday. I played 6..h6 though to prevent the bishop move to g5.|
Still very bad position for black, I was lucky to get a draw.
|Mar-20-14|| ||Once: <ndg2> I used to find that the Rubinstein French was easier (and safer) to play as black if you play 4...Nd7 before 5...Ngf6.|
|Mar-20-14|| ||fm avari viraf: One that flew away from the "Cuckoo's Nest".|
|Mar-20-14|| ||ndg2: < <once><ndg2> I used to find that the Rubinstein French was easier (and safer) to play as black if you play 4...Nd7 before 5...Ngf6.>
Certainly true. I somehow forgot theory and feared 5.Ng5 after 4...Nd7, which is of course nonsense.|
|Mar-20-14|| ||Sho: Once again, correct: Racquel Welch...deer-skin bikini.|
|Mar-20-14|| ||celtrusco: It was a bad day to play chess for someone, who was a very strong player. In somehow, this kind of games makes me feel a bit better in front of my mistakes. And I say me:-"I'm not the only one".|
|Mar-20-14|| ||Gottschalk: Bad game. Bird blundered here!
Steinitz was a great tactician and bequeathed magnificent games. Is incedible how some people might choose this as one of his best
|Jun-17-14|| ||unrankedandmisfiled: Why does Black not simply block the White bishop check with his pawn, his own white-square bishop, or take the white-square bishop with his remaining Knight?|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·