chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Henry Edward Bird vs Wilhelm Steinitz
London (1866), rd 8, Sep-??
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. Nyholm Attack (C65)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more Bird/Steinitz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-14-06  OJC: This is an interesting endgame. It seems that instead of 57. Ke3, Bird could have at least drawn with the strange-looking 57. bxc5.

If 57. ...c2 then 58. cxb6 c1=Q 59. b7 and the white knight saves the day since with Nd7+ it attacks the king and b8 at the same time.

If 57. ...bxc5 then 58. Ne4 c2 59. Nxc5 and black can't queen.

If 57. ...Kxf6 then 58. cxb6 and both sides will queen but white is a pawn up.

Apr-02-08  Knight13: 22. Rd2 g5 23. h3 h5 24. Qxb6 and then 25. Bxh5 does not work for black so he plays 23...g4 but then white still has 24. Qxb6. Hmmm... 22. Qxb6 is unnecessary then, since it gives black the a-file. 22. Rd2 with .R2e2 going crazy on the e-file and let black taking on b3 is better, IMO.
Aug-17-18  Sally Simpson: Been looking more closely at some of the games from this match.

OJC from 2004 is correct Bird can draw this here with the study like 57. bxc5


click for larger view

The point being although Black promotes and has time to get back and cover the Queening square.

57...c2 58. cxb6 c1=Q 59.b2.


click for larger view

Anything like 59...Qc7 fails to 60. b8=Q and Nd7+.

Black would have to settle for a very drawish position by taking the f6 Knight.

Not a blunder(s) on a the scale that appeared elsewhere in this interesting match but a miss none the less.

Aug-17-18  Straclonoor: <with the study like 57. bxc5>

It would be interesting 57....bxc5 58. Nd7+ Kd6 59.Nxc5 Kxc5 60.Ke3 and black have two alternatives

1) 60....g5 61.Kd3 b4 62.cxb4+ Kxb4 63.Kc2 Kc4

2) 60.... Kb4 61. f4 Kb3 62. f5 etc.

Aug-17-18  Yorkshire Fog: <Straclonoor> Your line 2) 60.... Kc4 <not the illegal Kb4> 61. f4 Kb3 62. f5 is hopeless for White after 62....c2

But White can win after 57....bxc5 with 58. Ne4. For example 58....b4 59.Nxc3


click for larger view

or 58....c2 59. Nxc5 c1=N (59...c1=Q 60.Nd3+) 60.Ke3 Kd5 61.Nd3 Nb3 62.Nf4+ Kd6 63.Nxg6


click for larger view

Aug-22-18  Straclonoor: <Yorkshire Fog> - Thanks!

But Stockfish confirm the draw after 57.dxc5

Analysis by Stockfish 200818 64 POPCNT:

= (0.00): 57.bxc5 Kxf6 58.cxb6 c2 59.b7 c1Q 60.b8Q Qd2+ 61.Kg3 Qe1+ 62.Kh3 Qf1+ 63.Kg3

As well as

= (-0.09): 57.Nd7+ Kd6 58.Nxc5 bxc5 59.Ke2 g5 60.bxc5+ Kxc5 61.Kd3 b4 62.axb4+ Kxb4 63.Kc2 Kc4 64.f4 gxf4 65.g5 Kd5 66.g6 Ke6 67.g7 Kf7 68.g8Q+ Kxg8 69.Kxc3 f3 70.Kd3 Kf7 71.Ke3 Kf6 72.Kxf3 Ke5 73.Kg3 Kd4 74.Kh3 Kc3 75.Kg3 Kc2 76.Kh3

Aug-22-18  Yorkshire Fog: <Straclonoor> Yes, you're right!

In addition to the <strange-looking 57. bxc5> pointed out by OJC in the first post, Bird could, as you say, also have saved the draw with 57. Nd7+, which looks more natural.

Nov-10-18  jphamlore: Lasker's Manual of Chess has the 57.♘d7+ ♔d6 58.♘xc5 bxc5 59.♔e2 line, Lasker arguing, "If Bird had played rightly, he would easily have drawn."
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
3- Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2
K v K
from Game collection: E by c65win
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
London Match, Game # 8
from WCC Index [ Steinitz - Bird 1866 ] by Benzol
Game 24
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by isfsam
Game 24
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC