chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Svetozar Gligoric vs Arthur Bisguier
Hastings (1961/62), Hastings ENG, rd 4, Dec-30
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Henneberger Variation (D63)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Gligoric/Bisguier games
sac: 18...Bxf4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: A diet of poisoned pawns can help you lose fast.

In this game, black sac'ed a piece (18...Bxf4) to get an attack going, but white defended well and was arguably better most of the way. However, on move 30, white faced this position [diagram]


click for larger view

The white bishop needn't fear ...exd3 since the black e-pawn is pinned. White might have figured that this e-pawn is attacked 3 times and defended only twice, so he ate it:

30.Bxe4? <poisoned pawn #1> Bf5! <and now it's the bishop's turn to be pinned!>

31.Qc4 <tries to escape with discovered check threat> Nxe4 <regaining his piece>

32.Nf6+? <better is 32.Ne7+, forking K+B with 32...Kh8 33.Nxf5 Qxd2 34.Qxd4 = > Kh8 <not 32...Kf8? 33.Qg8+ (perhaps white was hoping for this blunder?>

33.Ndxe4 gxf6
34.Nd6 Qh5? <better is 34...Qf4 with threats of ...Be4+ and Re1+>

Instead of taking that pawn, white should have played: 30.Nf4 Bf5 31.Qg2 exd3 32.Qxg5 Qxg5 33.Rxg5 g6, remaining up a piece for two pawns (note: weak doubled & isolated pawns), with at least some winning chances.

After 34...Qh5? [diagram]:


click for larger view

White can practically get even with 35.Qf1! (not 35.Nxe8?? Be4+ 36.Rg2 Qd1+ with mate to follow), double-attacking the bishop with the rook now in take. A likely continuation: 35...Re2 (threat: ...Qxh2#) 36.Qf4 Bg6 37.Rg4! with probable draw.

However, white went after another bad (in fact, much worse) pawn:

35.Qxd4?? <poisoned pawn #2> Qf3+!

White resigned, seeing: 36.Rg2 Re1+ 37.Qg1 Bh3 and after a couple spite checks from the knight, it will end with ...Qxg2#.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen's Pawn 2
by GiantPickle
A diet of poisoned pawns...
from Games analyzed by YouRang by YouRang
Hastings 1961/62
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC