chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Arthur Bisguier vs Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Malaga (1971), Malaga ESP, rd 14, Feb-??
Budapest Defense: Fajarowicz Variation (A51)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Bisguier/Ljubojevic game
sac: 9.Bc4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: Black could have played 16.Qxb4 an example of a following line might be 17.Bd2 Qe7 18.Ra1 (threatening Ba3 pinning the queen) Nd8 19.Ba3 c5 ( soon to be reinforced by b6) and now black has enough pressure to win whites f7 pawn, putting black up a pawn.
Apr-30-04  Benjamin Lau: IBM: for the fourth time, put a "..." to indicate black is moving. Second, 18. Ra1 does not threaten Ba3 because Bd2 has already been played, so Ba3 is now impossible.

After 16...Qxb4?!, I prefer 17. Bd2 Qe7 (17...Qb6 may be somewhat better) 18. Ng5 and white has a devastating attack with the two bishops and retains his pawn.

Apr-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: After 16...Qxb4? 17.Ng5 CRUNCH!
Apr-30-04  Benjamin Lau: <CRUNCH!>

Lol, feeling festive today Chessical? Your immediate 17. Ng5 is a bit better than my refutation since it does not give time for black to reorganize his pieces.

May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: <After 16...Qxb4? 17.Ng5 CRUNCH!> Your correct. Whites position is too strong by the 16th move. I did find a stronger plan of action black could have taken earlier in the game however. Black wins two pawns. 6. ... Bf5 7. Nc3 Nxf2 8. Qxf5 g6 9. Qc2 Nxh1 10. g3 Nxg3 11. hxg3 dxe5
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Not quite. You missed e6!. Reshevsky vs Bisguier, 1955
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: Black is slightly up in material, but white's strong minor piece attack proves in practice to make up for it as in that game.
May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  InspiredByMorphy: <Benjamin Lau> 6. e5! is an improvement, however, two minor pieces against a rook should only be debated in a case where the position is relative. For example in the endgame different factors and positions, will affect which is more effective. In such an early stage of the middlegame, it is very hard to know. For my opinion on where black could have improved in the game you provided, see my notes ... Reshevsky vs Bisguier, 1955
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: IBM: it is true that whether having two minor pieces or a rook is better is relative to the position; however in most cases, whether it be the middlegame or the endgame, the two minor pieces tend to be better, especially if one or both are bishops.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The Milky Way - Game 113
from The Fabulous Budapest Gambit by Buddy Revell
Black B Gambitz by Fredthebear
by fredthebear
The Milky Way - Game 113
from The Fabulous Budapest Gambit by Pyrandus
Repertorio
by Gottschalk
98_A51 Fajarowicz Gambit (3... Ne4)
by whiteshark
CRUNCH!
from Gelly in the Center? by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC