chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Joseph Henry Blackburne
Baden-Baden (1870), Baden-Baden GER, rd 1, Jul-18
King's Gambit: Declined. Classical Variation (C30)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 38 more Steinitz/Blackburne games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Well did the young Steinitz learn--he soon gave up such toys of his chess childhood as the King's Gambit and graduated to cramped defensive setups.

With that formidable genius <Conrad> at his side, this growth should surely have taken place sooner.

Mar-04-14  Conrad93: Well, at least I'm better than the World Champion according to this game, so I'm all set.
Mar-08-14  Whitehat1963: Wow. Sarcasm, I hope.
Mar-09-14  Conrad93: Nope, no sarcasm.

I could beat this version of Steinitz.

Mar-09-14  Whitehat1963: Well, <Conrad93>, there's nothing quite like modesty.
Mar-09-14  Conrad93: A knowledge of modern theory would let me easily beat him.

He would be rated around 2100+ in today's world.

Mar-09-14  Whitehat1963: <Conrad93>, you just love to throw anything out there in hopes of being a lightning rod. Steinitz would be rated 2100 today, huh? Okay. Whatever you say.
Mar-09-14  Whitehat1963: I'm curious, <Conrad93>. What do you think of Steinitz's and Lasker's play in this game below?

Lasker vs Steinitz, 1894

Mar-09-14  Whitehat1963: Or this game?

Lasker vs Steinitz, 1896

Mar-09-14  Conrad93: That game is closer to the 2200+ level.
Mar-09-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Conrad: I could beat this version of Steinitz.>

Maybe, so long as no en passant captures were permitted.....

Mar-09-14  Whitehat1963: Lasker and Steinitz played a world championship match at somewhere below 2300-level chess. Interesting. Thanks, <Conrad93>.
Mar-09-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: If this, ah, logic applied, a fish like myself should be heartened by the knowledge that I would have had a fair chance of defeating either of those titans in a match.
Mar-10-14  Whitehat1963: <perfidious>, what is this business about the en passant captures? Please tell me that our resident chess genius is well aware of the rules of the game!
Mar-10-14  Conrad93: Perfidious, most likely you would have.
Mar-20-14  Whitehat1963: I'm curious, <Conrad93>, what you make of Steinitz's performance in this game:

Steinitz vs Rock, 1863

Is it still far below 2500-level chess?

Mar-20-14  john barleycorn: <Whitehead1963> Steinitz copied Morphy Morphy vs NN, 1857

and a mate in 6 ,well I guess <Conrad93> does it every morning before breakfast :-)

Mar-21-14  Whitehat1963: Indeed! Before breakfast!
Jan-29-15  poorthylacine: "I am here to learn": Blackburne was younger than Steinitz, but the last changed completely his way of playing after this tournament, and we see like a "new" Steinitz when we consider his games from 1873!! In the Vienna tournament of 1873, Blackburne by his enormous energy finished first equal with Steinitz, but the latter won mostly of his games like easily and in comparison, Blackburne finished the tournament exhausted: so Steinitz won the mini match against Blackburne after the tournament, and in their match of 1876, he even crushed Blackburne by 7-0, an unbelievable exploit!! The veritable positional style was born!!
Jul-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Where/when is this game from?

Was it an offhand game from Baden-Baden?

Jul-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <Die folgenden Partieen wurden im grossen Turnier zu Baden-Baden> source: Neue Berliner Schachzeitung, Volume 7, pp245-246

https://books.google.com/books?id=T...

Jul-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Thanks <jnpope>, I'm just beginning to look at Schachzeitung's coverage.

The <Neue Berliner> introduces the games with:

<Die folgenden partieen wurden im Turnier zu Baden-Baden gespielt>

= <The following partieen were played in the tournament to Baden-Baden>

Since we already have two <Steinitz // Blackburne> games is there a conflict?

The other score (@g 1028860) seems to agree up to move 28, where it has 28.Rhb2 instead of 28.Na5

The move given here 28.Na5?? allows 28...Qxc3+ and seems to just throw the game away. Perhaps the other score makes more "chess-sense"?

(Black is winning either way - but 28.Rhb2 does look more plausible)

Jul-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Oh, wait - I see <Neue Berliner> actually notes 28.Na5 as a poor move, and has analysis that could have been mistakenly incorporated into the movelist.

Gheesh... maybe I should check the other sources? (Ya think?!)

Nov-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Going to put through this game through some lab analysis, check back in a few hours. =)
Nov-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Analysis completed!! =)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Joseph Henry Blackburne
by capybara
Amusing
by lonchaney
Baden-Baden 1870
by suenteus po 147
kibitz games
by eigis
Challenger Blackburne
by Gottschalk


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC