Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Joseph Henry Blackburne vs Wilhelm Steinitz
Steinitz - Blackburne (1876), London ENG, rd 2, Feb-19
Scotch Game: Horwitz Attack. Blackburne Variation (C45)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 119 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 38 more Blackburne/Steinitz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-28-05  TedBundy: It's rather pretty and instructive to see how Steinitz deftly sidesteps Blackie's ingenius threats to slowly improve the position of his pieces. Then he wins a pawn and it's all over. While he made it easy, I think with all my modern knowledge of chess strategy, Blackie may have overrun my patzer's 2005 defence anyway.
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Sheer tenacity wins out. Blackburne should have won this one. I can imagine the looks of rage he shot at Steinitz as he could find no way to finish off the perpetrator of the maddening Rh8-g8-f8-g8 rope-a-dope strategy.

23 Qa3! is very nice, but Blackburne missed the crowning shot.

24 Ne5?! seems to be the turning point. It is not bad, but slowly lets the advantage slip away. 24 Nd6! or 24 Nxf6 would have ended the game within a few moves.

24 Nd6! cxd6 25 Qxd6 would have overtaxed even Steinitz with threats all over, Qc7 mate chief among them, but also against d7 and b8 very quickly.

Or if Steinitz refused the piece with 24...Qg6 25 Nxb7 Rxb7 26 Nxf6 Qxf6 27 Bxc6 is the straightforward win of a piece because 27...Qxc6 28 Qe7+ mates on the back rank.

24 Nxf6 would win too almost as prettily because of the weakness of d7. If 24...Qxf6 25 Rxd7+! Kxd7 26 Qd3+ quickly overwhelms Black.

Mar-01-05  TedBundy: Wow. Great analysis. Makes me feel better to know while I would lose, Steinitz just missed doing so. Maybe ingenuity and cleverness is too taxing and tiring as compared to simple, practical moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <A central pawn is worth a little trouble> Steinitz

I think Steinitz got more trouble than he bargained for. But Black tenacious defense, and that how he slowly took over the game, that is a real treat.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <tamar> Something seems to be off kilter in the <24 Nxf6 would win too almost as prettily because of the weakness of d7. If 24...Qxf6 25 Rxd7+! Kxd7 26 Qd3+ quickly overwhelms Black.> line. (= OK, I can not figure this one out.)
Apr-04-05  RookFile: Looking at the position before 37. f3, White has excellent practical chances for a draw or a win, because he has the safer king. It's not hard to see a move like a4 at some point prying open black's king position even further.

I imagine Blackburne looked at 37. Re7 and rejected it for some reason. Not sure why, maybe 37... Qf5. If there is a problem with it, the 37. R3e2 suggests itself. White has absolutely no reason to panic, as
long as his king is safer than black's, he has excellent chances.

There is no hurry.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: ...But I truly think that if one's opponent plays the scotch then ....Qh4 is the best response by FAR!
Feb-12-18  ColdSong: Blackburne's handling of compensations for the pawn seems nice and convincing to a certain extent,but things go curiously wrong after the critical position (29...d6).
Feb-12-18  paul1959: <ColdSong> Critical position for sure. This was Blackburne last chance for an advantage with 30 Qe6+ Kb7 31 Rxd6 cxd6 32 Rxd6 when Black has to give up its Queen for the Rook. After 30 R5d3 the game was equal until Blackburne blundered his a-pawn
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
he played this same line against Blackburne three times, and wo
from The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games
by KingG
He played this same line against Blackburne three times, and wo
from Not Duct Tape, Not Beer, Not Irish Either by fredthebear
Blackburne stymied
from Bouncy Castle, Tombola, Face Paint... by offramp
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games
by Nimzophile
Understand all the lines for play against scotch opening!
from Study for World Open by hibolife
London Match, Game # 2
from WCC Index [ Steinitz - Blackburne 1876 ] by Benzol

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC