chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Joseph Henry Blackburne vs Celso Golmayo Zupide
Blackburne - Golmayo (1891), Havana CUB, rd 6, Feb-23
Queen's Gambit Declined: Harrwitz Attack. Main Line (D37)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Blackburne/C Golmayo games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-01-06  Saruman: Perhaps Golmayo overlooked the 63.h6 tactic?
Jan-01-06  who: What else could he have done? The white pieces are just far better placed than the black ones at move 56, and the threat of 57.Re6 is looming. The basic problem black has is that white simply has too many tempi wasting moves available.
Jan-01-06  who: I don't see why white doesn't simply play 61.Kb6
Jan-01-06  Saruman: I think Blackburne did not want to allow a move like g5!? although it would still lose for black, so instead he played it save and didnt look for a faster win. Well, thats what I think.
Jan-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Afternoon: Amazing game by Blackburne. If you had shown me the game and asked who played White, I would have guessed Rubenstein from around 1910, perhaps from his match vs. Salwe. Just goes to show how much more well rounded the 19th Century players were than their reputation would indicate.
Jan-01-06  Assassinater: Isn't c5 necessary at some point, probably around move 15? As it is, white removed black's ability to play c5, a typical freeing maneouvre. With his cramped game, black shuffles around until his inevitable demise.
Jan-02-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Black definitely needs ...c5, but I suspect you meant move 25--he has no c-pawn on move 15. ...c6-c5, creating the hanging pawns, won't solve all of Black's problems, but he will have a latent threat of forcing a passed pawn with either ...d4 or ...c4. This, combined with the lack of easy invasion squares for White's King, will give him counterchances.

Therefore Blackburn, anticipating Nimzowitsch, restrains, blockades and destroys the Queen side pawns. It's a pretty nice display of avant-garde thinking in chess.

Jan-02-06  Assassinater: Wow, I got it screwed up yesterday. Okay, what I meant is that wasn't <d4> necessary for black at move 15?
Jan-02-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Morning: 15...d4 is interesting and poses new problems for both sides. Blackburne would probably have played 16.e4 and then plan to blockade and eventually win the d4 pawn. Not as easy as it sounds.

Another advantage to 15...d4 is that it keeps more pieces on the board. Golmayo's policy of swapping pieces at every opportunity was flawed (indeed, 8...exd5 was probably better). The Queen-less middlegame after 15...d4 might not be better in theory, but in practical play might offer better chances for the draw.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC