|May-14-05|| ||paladin at large: 17. Bxh7+, winning black's queen, was hanging in the air ever since Verlinsky's 12.0-0-0|
What was wrong with Bogo?
|Jun-06-06|| ||offramp: Taimanov pointed out that Bogo could have turned the tables. After 13.Bg5
click for larger view
Black could have played 13... Bxf3 14. Bxh7+ Nxh7 15. Rxd8 Bxd8 16. Bxd8 Nd4 17. Qb1 Nb3+ 18. Kc2 Nd4+ 19. Kc1 Bh5 with some winning chances.
|Mar-28-09|| ||vonKrolock: <Taimanov pointed out> It would be interesting to know when he showed that suggestive, and also, so to say, compelling line - in this article in Russian,, if I'm reading well, it's just stadted that "<both Verlinsky and Rabinovich> made no comment on black's 13th move, and that 13...♗xf3etc is checked with <Fritz and Junior> http://www.chesspro.ru/book/rc25.sh...|
|Aug-30-09|| ||Phony Benoni: <vonKrolock> Taimanov's line is mentioned in <The Soviet Championships>, a book co-authored with Bernard Cafferty and originally published in 1998. On p.23, Taimanov writes:|
<"The crucial moment. Both sides seemingly considered the text forced in view of the threat of 14.Bxh7+. Yet here there is a hidden puzzle that was not appreciated at the time, nor in the succeeding seven decades. The point is that, as discovered when analysing for this book, Black had a remarkable combination, giving up his queen to seize the initiative...">
So Taimanov is claiming it as original analysis from the 1990s.
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC