chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Erich Eliskases vs Efim Bogoljubov
Match (1939), Kaufbeuren (Germany), rd 13, Jan-29
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Blumenfeld Variation (D49)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 24 more E Eliskases/Bogoljubov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Erich Eliskases vs Efim Bogoljubov (1939)
Score sheet courtesy of the Kaufbeuren Chess Club.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <zb2cr: In this position, with White on the move, the doubled Pawn doesn't matter. That's because it's blocked, so no tempo-move with it.>

Actually, it is not the fact that the trailing Black f-pawn is blocked that matters (because once the front f-pawn moves forward, the trailing pawn will have a tempo move), but rather that it has already reached Black's fifth rank. This means that a tempo move by the f4-pawn will be to Black's sixth rank, controlling squares on the seventh rank and thus bringing about stalemate scenarios. If the entire position were moved back one rank towards Black's side of the board, Black would be winning. In the position with Kings on f3 and e5 and with Black pawns on f4 and f5, the main winning line (with White to move) goes: 1.Kf2 Ke4 2.Ke2 f3+ 3.Kf2 Kf4 4.Kf1 Ke3 5.Ke1 f2+ 6.Kf1 f4 7.Kg2 Ke2 8.Kh2 Kf3 [NOT 8...f1=Q?? stalemate] 9.Kh3 f1Q+ 10.Kh4 Qb5 11.Kh3 Qh5#

Dec-04-06  DanRoss53: What happened around move 33 of the scoresheet? It looks like one of my old scores in which I forget to record a move and then have to mentally traverse the game backwards to the point of the error.
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: An unusual Monday puzzle. The lesson is that in a pawn vs king ending-the weaker side should move his king straight back,so that he can gain the opposition when his opponent approaches. In this game,black's second pawn is unluckily too far advanced-with the double pawn,the ideal situation is to use to pawn as a tempo move at the crucial time-here,however,it is stalemate.

Today with the puzzle and the gotd-we have stalemates-I wonder if this is a trend this week.

Dec-04-06  kkkkimura: Help! Why doesn't 67...f2 work instead of Ke3? Don't you have a single pawn ending after that? Hope I didn't completely miss something which I probably did. Thanks.
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <kkkkimura: Help! Why doesn't 67...f2 work instead of Ke3?> 68. Kxf2, and yes, it's a single pawn ending, but Black can't force promotion.

It might go: 68...f3 69. Kf1 Ke3 70. Ke1 f2+ 71. Kf1 Kf3 stalemate (any other move surrenders the pawn).

Dec-04-06  zb2cr: <Peligroso Patzer>,

Thanks for the elaboration. I already understood what you had said, for example that if the position were moved back 1 square toward Black's side of the board Black would win. My understanding was on a more intuitive (or instinctual) level, though, as opposed to your very finely presented logical construct.

Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: <I was under the impression that Algebraic notation was a relatively recent arrival. Yet, this scoresheet, from 1939, seems to suggest otherwise. It could be that I, living in the US, was getting a biased perspective regarding this. Was the US slow to adopt an Algebraic notation that the rest of the world had already embraced, just like it is slow to adopt the metric system?> Yes, the US (or the anglo-saxon-world?) was very slowly adopting algebraic notation. I have German chess books from the 1930s and they're all in algebraic. I don't think I've ever seen a German chess book in descriptive.
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: According to wiki, earliest recorded usage of Algebraic Notation is 1173! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...
Dec-04-06  vibes43: <kevin86: Today with the puzzle and the gotd-we have stalemates-I wonder if this is a trend this week.> I hope chessgames throws a few more of these in for the future easy days. Something a little less obvious as to whether or not to settle for stalemate but not having to analyze ten lines ten moves ahead. I have never been able to force a stalemate line when I should have. I think they are more difficult to visualize than a winning or losing position.
Dec-04-06  percyblakeney: Concerning stalemates, here's a nice one missed by both players, it's just to look at the final position and suggest what black should have done instead of resigning...: M Klinova vs D Spence, 2006
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: My favorite endgame position with advanced doubled pawns is a Rook endgame study by Oldrich Duras . It is a Lucena position with an extra pawn on the b-file. In this case, the extra pawn causes huge differences from what would be correct play with a single b-pawn. For anyone who may be interested, this study is the subject of comments on the page accessible through the above link posted by Gypsy and dated October 18 and 19, 2005.
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: One final post for today, resorting to somewhat attenuated connections to post a link to one of my favorite games: Eliskases vs Gruenfeld, 1933

It concludes with a beautiful endgame by Eliskases against Gruenfeld, the victim of draw-by-stalemate in today's GOTD

Dec-04-06  JustAFish: Thanks, Cu8sfan and WannaBe. I suspected as much. I was a family friend's dinner party the other evening and spotted an original editorial cartoon in a frame on the wall. It was of Uncle Sam in an old style bathing suit cautiously dipping his toe in a sea labelled "The Metric System". Floating on its "back" in the water already was a Globe labelled "Practically, the Rest of the World". The globe was shouting "Come on in, the Water's fine!" The date on the on the editorial? 1972.
Dec-04-06  RonB52734: <Keano: were comments deleted from this thread?> Funny, I had the same feeling, that someone had suggested a move for black that forced a win. It's not here anymore. He or she probably realized that it wasn't a forced win after all and deleted it.
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Yes, comments were deleted when <CG> fixed the moves. As originally posted the score read 65. Kg1 instead of Kf1. Black would have had an easy win with 65...Kg3. An outcry rose up and numerous posts pointed out the win. But Bogo would never have missed an obvious move like that.
Dec-04-06  Jackz: Great example of the importance of opposition, I got this one instantly.
Dec-04-06  unferth: I think the most interesting part is that two masters of this strength didn't shake hands five moves earlier. it's clearly drawn after 54 Kf2--why play on?
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: We were able to correct the score from our copy of the original score sheet. (We also have the second page, not shown above.) Move 61 was also corrected (Kf1 instead of Ke1).
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  flintrock: <Peligroso Patzer> Thank you. A good thing for a lesser patzer than you are to know over the board. I knew about opposition. Thanks to your comment, I now know when an extra doubled pawn on an inside file should win and when it shouldn't.
Dec-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <Marco65> I have redone the "analysis" ... <I could see this was a draw - but as <Sneaky> says it is not easy as one has to be careful - if:

The variation should have been -

67 Ke1? Ke3 68 Kf1 f2 69 Kg2 Ke2 70 Kh2!! f2-f1=Q?? is stalemate!

But Black wins of course by either 70. ..f3 or 71.... f2-f1 = N+!!>

I was pointing out how Black would lose if he didnt go for the opposition - BU there are still traps for Black to watch out for - of course the best move is 67 Kf1 as played which gets a draw. 67 Ke1 loses as I said.

Dec-02-07  Chess Addict: What motivates 21. Qf3?
Dec-03-08  WhiteRook48: Hey I have 2 pawns oops they're both f pawns
Mar-23-09  WhiteRook48: the pawn on f4 stopped everything. If it wasn't advanced so far, black would have won
Apr-11-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <cu8sfan: Yes, the US (or the anglo-saxon-world?) was very slowly adopting algebraic notation. I have German chess books from the 1930s and they're all in algebraic. I don't think I've ever seen a German chess book in descriptive.>

When I first played in my local club (1972) the strongest player was a Swiss, who used German algebraic, and there were a few others who took up the English form. By 1976, I got there. (Slow learner, don't you know)

As to books, in English, everything was done in descriptive by all the publishing houses; it was only towards the late '70s that they, too, saw the light.

Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Up two pawns in the ending, but couldn't convert this one. If they were on adjacent files, easy point.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
shakman's favorite games
by shakman
Rook manoeuvres
from Best endings by outplayer
King and Two Pawns vs. King
from King and Pawn Endgames by CoachTatiana
57 Lateral , side checks
from Super Bogo 3 by policrates
two extra pawns make no difference
from Endgame by WhiteRook48
Bogoljubov - Eliskases 1939
by Pawn and Two
King and Two Pawns vs. King
from King and Pawn Endgames by StudyTheEndgame
PP
from Patzerific by FENfiend
67.? (Monday, December 4)
from Puzzle of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
Game 13.
from Bogoljubov - Eliskases 1939 by Chessical
black has choice of ways to stalemate :(
from Gorney Park by kevin86
Bogoljubov's draw KPP vs. K - draw
from iking's endgames favz by iking
67.? (December 4, 2006)
from Monday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Slav Meran main (c)
from Wookash's games to check by Wookash
Final de 2 peones vs Rey
from artnova's tactics by artnova
En prise's favorite games
by En prise
KPP vs. K draw
from ABC Games for Lessons by ABCChess
Or two.
from Worst Chess Games of All Time by Brit


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC