chessgames.com

register now - it's free!
Mikhail Botvinnik vs Salomon Flohr
Botvinnik-Flohr Match (1933)  ·  Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack. Modern Defense (B14)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 29 more Botvinnik/Flohr games
sac: 33...bxa3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  arielbekarov: To all of you !
I would love to hear opinions and comments on this game Botvinnik vs Flohr, 1933. This is a very educative game, where Salo Flohr shows that he was quite capable of winning the worldchampion title, but, WW II stopped him. Botvinnik was already one of the strongest players and was, as well, qualified to take the title. The game as such is very subtle.
Botvinnik makes though two mayor mistakes after a quick analyze. I hope that you can assist me, because I think that Flohr takes every opportunity here in his favor.

7. d5 is as far as I can see a clear mistake. Botvinnik could simply have played Nf3.

31. Qd4 Qxd4 ! Botvinnik shouldn't have given Flohr the chance to exchange the Queens.

34. Nxd6, is there any alternative ?
Here it is lost, because Botvinnik's Knight is out of play here. He can't use it because of black's pawn on a2.

The amazing is that Flohr beats Botvinnik in pure positional play. Flohr did quite correctly exchange the rooks, as well. So, I am eagerly waiting for your opinions.
I love this game !
Ariel

Apr-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <arielbekarov> I cannot see why <9.d5> "is a clear mistake". It is sharp, but not anti-positiona1 and it is still a theoretical line.

Botvinik later played <10.Nf3> and wrote "In the first game of the match I played 10.Bxf6 and got the worse game; but after analysis at home I was convinced that if <10.Nf3> e6 11.Bxf6! Qxf6 12.Qxd3, Black has a very bad position. The bishop at f8 has no move, and the king is stranded in the centre.

So Botvinnik played the variation again in the match and won.

<31.Qd4> seems to be an effort to achieve more than the alternative 31.Nxb5 Ba6 32.Nfd4 Qe5+ 33.Kd1 Qe4 34.Nxd6 Qb1=

<33.axb4> seems to be a draw.

It looks to me that Botvinnik lost by trying too hard to win.

Apr-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  arielbekarov: Thank you Chessical for your assistance !

Move 7. d5.
It is sharp, but has no effect. Botvinnik loses in tempo, as far as I can understand.

You are right about axb4. It seems to be a draw.

This is note-worthy ;
"It looks to me that Botvinnik lost by trying too hard to win." It is quite possible, because 34. Nxd6 is the move that finally gives Flohr the victory.

Great ! This possibility to exchange ideas !!
But, you have to take in account that I am a real beginner on the "commenting" field, but I find it very interesting to analyze these great games. Now, I have to start with my own games, as well.
Greetings
Ariel

Apr-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  arielbekarov: I did forget to write move 33.axb4 instead of Ncxb5.
Might be confusing for other readers.
Ariel
Jun-10-04  Whitehat1963: Is this hopeless?
Jun-10-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Yes, the final position is hopeless < Whitehat1963>, no point adjourning that. It seems that Botvinnik underestimated 35...Ba6+!! This move wins the game as it traps the white knight on d6. Botvinnik probably reckoned only with Bxd5; and if he considered Ba6 at all, then surely only as a harmless check. I am suprised that Botvinnik's desperado was Nxf7 instead of Nxf5, which certainly was better. But it could have been an attempt to fish in a time trouble, I do not know. Black a2 pawn spells doom at any rate.
Jan-02-05  aw1988: Flohr clearly had extraordinary talent.
Feb-20-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: Two knights versus two bishops here with respective queen assists lead to a very instructive game. That passed pawn is a thorn in white's side. The king has to disengage from the d-pawn he intended to escort to queendom, allowing black to take it, if the advancing a-pawn is to be dealt with. The white knight is also tied up with prevention of promotion. Thanks, Mikhail and Salomon.
Mar-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Beautiful play by Flohr.
May-25-09  Sem: 7. d5 is the sort of daring move for which I am far too timid, I don't even see them. So I applaud White for putting up a fight, even if he may have been wrong. As Lasker said: 'You have to give a game a face.'
May-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: I don't see the problem with 7.d5. In fact, it seems like the most obvious move in the position. Black is threatening to win a key central pawn, so White moves it to a square where it is protected, at the same time gaining a tempo by chasing Black's knight and gaining space.

And if you look at the statistics, in my database, White scores 71% after 7.d5 Ne5 8.Qd4.

If there is a questionable move by White in the opening, then it is probably 10.Bxf6. Far more common now are 10.Qxd3 or 10.Nf3. White has an edge in development, and it doesn't make sense to speed up Black's development like Botvinnik does in this game.

After 10.Nf3, Black will often invest a tempo with 10...h6 to provoke the exchange that Botvinnik carries out willingly.

Botvinnik himself switched from 10.Bxf6 to 10.Nf3 in game 9 of this match (Botvinnik vs Flohr, 1933), which he won. In that game, Black's king got stuck in the center after 10.Nf3 g6 11.Bxf6 exf6 12.O-O Qb6 13.Rfe1+

Nov-03-10  Monoceros: Flohr does a really good job of making the isolani useless for Botvinnik: he blockades it first so it can't advance, plants a Bishop on d7 to guard the squares controlled by the isolani, and methodically arranges his own Pawns to keep Botvinnik's Knights away from all the approaches. The IQP never falls but it's never any help to Botvinnik's game either. I guess that an isolated pawn does spread gloom over the whole board.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game 1
from Botvinnik-Flohr Match 1933 by suenteus po 147
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
caro-kan
by rodrigochaves
Match Game 1, 1933
from Salo Flohr's Best Games of Chess - Donges by TheFocus
After being busted by the Bishop's pair, ONCE....
from LEARNING FROM THE MASTERS by laskereshevsky
See 2 {N} vs 2 {b} in a solid battle. Thanks, Salo.
from wars between different armies. by nasmichael
G289
from 500MGC2 by morwa
Game 289
from 500 Master Games of Chess II by suenteus po 147
b14
from favorite games according to opening b00-b99 by mirage
Flohr beating Botvinnik !
from The Art of Chess ! by arielbekarov
Game 348
from Guess-the-Move Chess: 1920-1939 (Part 1) by Anatoly21
+2 -2 =8 vs. Flohr (Moscow/Leningrad, 1933)
from Match Botvinnik! by amadeus
estrategias 2 de suetin
by LESTRADAR
Botvinnik Out-Botvinnik'ed
from Through the Years by parisattack
Botvinnik loses with the IQP
from Losing At Their Own Game by Bears092
Caro-Kann
by JimBow1849


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies