chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Igor Bondarevsky
USSR Absolute Championship (1941), Leningrad- Moscow URS, rd 4, Mar-27
Queen's Gambit Declined: Anti-Tartakower Variation (D55)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Botvinnik/Bondarevsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Another game where the 3-fold repetition rule seems suspended.
May-17-05  Runemaster: I don't know what the exact rule was that applied to that tournament, but I expect that as usual the player wanting to claim triple repetition had to actually claim it as he makes his move, so it would not have been automatic.
May-22-06  gulliver: The bishop maneuvere on moves 85-88 is nice and one can learn about endings from it. It is like black is earning a move, or saying to white now it is your turn
Jul-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <offramp: Another game where the 3-fold repetition rule seems suspended.>

I think there's no three-fold repetition of position here. The rule is that you can claim a draw if the same position repeats itself three times, isn't it? What are the three instances where the position was repeated? I think there is no such thing between moves 65 and 74. In reading Black's Queen moves I don't see the Queen going to the same square three times. Do you mean some other occasion in the game?

Altogether, a very fine game by Bondarevsky with the Black pieces against one of the best players who ever lived.

Nov-09-09  Plato: One of only two games Botvinnik lost in this tournament (out of 20 games against very strong opposition).

On move 39, probably in severe time trouble one move before the time control was reached, Botvinnik misses the win:

39.Nxd4 Rxd4, 40.Qc3 Qf6, 41.Rg7! (intending 42.Qg3) and Black is helpless.

Feb-06-10  crwynn: The opening did not turn out very well for Botvinnik here, of course there is the question of whether the Queen should go to d2 or c2 in this variation, but the answer is certainly not, "both"! 11.Qd2 essentially wastes a tempo to help Black carry out the ...d4 push, because of this White is soon forced to give up the idea of playing against an isolated pawn, and allows a symmetrical structure with 17.Nd4.

<Plato: One of only two games Botvinnik lost in this tournament (out of 20 games against very strong opposition).

On move 39, probably in severe time trouble one move before the time control was reached, Botvinnik misses the win:>

This seems to imply Botvinnik was heading to his usual victory and got derailed somehow; it was actually Black that went astray in time trouble. By move 28 Black has a clear advantage; probably both players were somewhat inaccurate for the next few moves, but 35.Rce1? was a serious error and 35...Rc2 would win. Instead Black was worried about the d5 pawn and played 35...Be4? allowing an exchange that relieved the pressure.

Aug-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: < Fusilli: <offramp: Another game where the 3-fold repetition rule seems suspended.> ....The rule is that you can claim a draw if the same position repeats itself three times, isn't it?....>

There's more to it than that: the same player must be on move in each case and the dynamic elements of the position must remain as they were; eg, a player cannot have moved his/her king to f7 and e8 after, say, the second repetition.

For an incorrect claim under the rules, see this game (Keene vs P H Donoso Velasco, 1976) and White's annotations, particularly at his 78th move.

Dec-08-16  edubueno: Qué bien jugaba Bondarevsky
Jul-26-19  tigreton: Ya te digo.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
+2 -1 =1 vs. Bondarevsky (USSR Absolute, 1941)
from Match Botvinnik! by amadeus
Bondarevsky teaches Botwinik a lesson
from gulliver's favorite games by gulliver
USSR Absolute Championship 1941
by Benzol
+2 -1 =1 vs. Bondarevsky (USSR Absolute, 1941)
from Match Botvinnik! by chessgain
Queen's Gambit Declined: Anti-Tartakower Variation
from QUEEN'S GAMBIT DECLINED by gambitfan


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC