chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Samuel Reshevsky
FIDE World Championship Tournament (1948), The Hague NED, rd 4, Mar-09
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Line (E40)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 57 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Botvinnik/Reshevsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-22-05  MidnightDuffer: Black's move #28 should have been ...Ng5 and he has the advantage!

Sammy ran into time trouble in this game; too bad, 29. ... Bxd4 30. fxe6 Bxf2+ 31. Rxf2 Nxf2 32. Kxf2 Rxe6 and Reshevsky has a slight material lead.

Officially, it is a forfeit, he must have run out of time. As it is, Reshevsky has a slight material advantage at the end of this game.

Jan-22-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: I don't see any material advantage for black. He two pawns for a knight.
Jan-22-05  MidnightDuffer: You know more about than me <Gregor Samsa> Sorry if I misled anyone!
May-17-08  Albertan: Reshevsky could have also played 28...Ra5 with an advantage due to the double attack against Botvinnik's Knight, and after 29.gxf5 Qxd5 30.Rxe4 Qxf5 Reshevsky would have remained a pawn up.

Oct-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: After 29.gxf5, instead of 29...Qxf5, perhaps 29...Bxd4 30.fxe6 Bxf2+ 31.Rxf2 Nxf2

Instead of 30...Qxh3, perhaps 30...Qxe4 31.Rxe4 Nxa3 32.Ne7+ Bxe7 33.Rxe7 Nb5

If 30.Qxc4?? instead of 30.Qxe4, then 30...Bxf2+ and 31...Rxc4

31...Rcc6?? is the losing move. Perhaps 31...Rac6 or 31...b5, or 31...Qh5.

After White played 32.Nf4, 32...Qc8 fails to 33.Qxc4 with check. If 32...Qg3+, then 33.Kh1 Qg5 34.Qxc4.

If Reshevsky had won this game, he would have taken 2nd place with 11.5 (Botvinnik would have still won the world championship with 13 instead of 14 points). A draw would have given him 11 points and a tie for 2nd-3rd with Smyslov.

Apr-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: +3 -1 =1 in favor of Botvinnik.
He was clearly the better player in 1948.
Jul-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: 28.....Ng5 would have been beautiful -- and if 29.Qd3 Nxf3+ 30.Qxf3 fxg4 when black's ahead.

I'm surprised by 10....Bd6. It seems like black should play ....a5 immediately and if b5, .....c5.

Both sides get stuck at about move 24. 24.Ra2 is interesting. 26.Nd5 feels incorrect....and would have been after 28.....Ng5!

Jul-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <MidnightDuffer: Black's move #28 should have been ...Ng5 and he has the advantage!>

This was mentioned in Botvinnik's Best Games, 1947-70, by the annotator of that game-may have been Keres.

<.....Officially, it is a forfeit, he must have run out of time.....>

Reshevsky indeed lost on time.

Oct-04-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <perifidious>

<Reshevsky indeed lost on time.>

Quite right:

<"As expected, both players ran short of time and after twenty-seven moves, their respective times were 2:17 [Botvinnik] and 2:26 [Reshevsky]. On this occasion <<<The U.S. speed whiz>>> faltered, blundered badly and then-- incredibly-- lost the game on time!">

D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title."

"Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), pp. 13-14

Oct-04-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Not really incredible that Reshevsky lost on time, once he saw he was losing anyway. He let his flag fall against Bronstein in 1953 rather than resign. Probably did the same here.

Reshevsky vs Bronstein, 1953

Oct-05-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project:

<"Botvinnik take some sort of <<<pills>>> during the game. Can they be vitamins?">

D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title."

"Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), p.16

Apr-10-15  A.T PhoneHome: Considering the amount and nature of theories formed regarding this 1948 Botvinnik triumph it doesn't come as a surprise, for it is definitely with a hint of deja-vu that "Botvinnik takes pills" argument was also made.
Apr-11-15  RookFile: White's g4 thrust is pretty brazen and shows the fighting qualities of Botvinnik. It's the sort of move that also shows up in Petrosian's games.
Apr-11-15  A.T PhoneHome: Botvinnik was a fighter for sure! And he really liked his pawn pushes.
Jul-17-17  Toribio3: Actually, the mighty king of Botvinnik was exposed in the end. Nevertheless, he is a master of defense; the attack of Reshevsky failed miserably!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Beating the Nimzo-Indian D - Top GM Games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
+3 -1 =1 vs. Reshevsky (World Championship 'minimatch')
from Match Botvinnik! by chessgain
Game 9
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by AdrianP
Round Four, Game Eight, March 9, 1948, The Hague
from WCC Index [World Championship Tournament 1948] by Resignation Trap
Nimzo-Indian Study
by fispok
Game 9
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by demirchess
Botvinnik's Best Games 1947-1970
by uglybird
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
+3 -1 =1 vs. Reshevsky (World Championship 'minimatch')
from Match Botvinnik! by amadeus
Round 4: Botvinnik 2 1/2, Reshevsky 1 1/2
from 1948 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
"Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), pp. 13-14
from Indians Past Nimzo-, Bogo-, Anti-Fredthebear by fredthebear
Botvinnik's Best Games 1947-1970
by nakul1964
Power Chess - Botvinnik
by Anatoly21
Game 391
from number 4 by Frodo7
"Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), pp. 13-14
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
Game 9
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 9
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Art of War's favorite games 7
by Art of War
Nimzo
by codex9000


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC