chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vasily Smyslov vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Botvinnik - Smyslov World Championship Match (1954), Moscow URS, rd 3, Mar-20
French Defense: Winawer. Retreat Variation Armenian Line (C18)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 104 more Smyslov/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-11-03  ughaibu: One for Drukenknight (if he ever comes back) a tripled pawn equals a bishop.
Sep-11-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Interesting Game
Sep-17-03  fred lennox: The Bishop is worth more than the tripled g pawns. Smyslov should of gone for a kingside attack. As Botvinnik states 27 Qg2...Rfe1, h6...Ba5, Re5 with a powerful attack. Smyslov's mistake is to go for automatic exchanges thinking a superior positon will win itself. Instead black is left with no winning attacks. What makes weak pawns really vunerable are heavy pieces. Attack! not lay back.
Sep-18-03  ughaibu: If 27.Qg2 how about Rc4?
Sep-19-03  fred lennox: I like Re7...Qd8 or 6, Bxc4...dxc4, Qxb7. No credit to my broad strategy if this works for I did not see the interesting...Rc4
Oct-19-03  ughaibu: DRUKENKNIGHT: What's your view?
Oct-19-03  drukenknight: well ugi, for one thing, I had to modify my theory of doubled pawns. For second it is way too late in the morning, I was feeding baby the last couple hourse. But let's see....

Okay the game ended in a draw; and black had 3 more pawns for the B, so material was even that seems fine. Perhaps there was a problem not one of material/attack but time/space?

You know Botwinnik. is like the only player in history to retreat the B to a4 in the Winawer. Tal also did that once vs Fischer, at Leipzig.

if you look at the early going, black is actually ahead in development, if that is the case then I say start making exchanges, start doing stuff. Forget that stuff: "all the pieces must be on their best squares before the attack" If the guy is behind in development why let him catch up? Besides is it really an attack? you're just trying to take advantage in some way.

You can see that this is actually what Botw. does try to do. 11....NxN I would agree that makes sense, now he has 3 pieces out vs only 1 for white. Perfect how often do you get that as black?

Why not 12...a5? Just keep exchanging, good things are bound to happen if your opponent has made serious error. Is black going for an attack? material? who cares? just read and react.

14...f6 you can see that was just a little late huh? A move or two earlier would have better effect, black makes 2 moves 12/13 and whatever advantage there was is lost.

Oct-19-03  ughaibu: Thanks for the long reply, if you'll indulge me I'll think about your suggestions little by little, on the theoretical side, I thought Smyslov was well ahead but it turned out to be an illusoion. Had the three pawns been on the queenside (famous queenside majority) I think Smyslov would've won, on the kingside they act somewhat as a barbed wire fence does.
Apr-08-08  Knight13: I like how Botvinnik keeps his bishop on c1 and let the position tell him where it belongs, which is definitely b2!!!
Feb-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: Botvinnik calls both 14...f6 and 17...Qe8 serious mistakes, remarking after 18...Ng6 that "this leads to a completely lost position, but it is already difficult to know what to advise Black."

Stockfish, however, concludes that Black is fine after 18...f5 and that 14...f6 and 17...Qe8 were not mistakes at all. Instead, 18...Ng6 was a big error.

The computer agrees with Botvinnik's conclusions that 25.a5! would have been more precise and that 27.Qe6+ throws away White's large advantage. the computer prefers 27.Qe7 and 27.Qg2.

Feb-08-12  Poisonpawns: On move 14..Perhaps h6 or a6 according to Wade,Whiteley, and Keene 19.f5 is winning according to Wade,Whiteley, and Keene in the book:World Chess Championship Botvinnik to Kasparov. They cite 25.Rae1? as an error when (25 ed Qxe2 26.Bxe2 Rc2 27.a5 wins. They also give 27.Qe6+? saying that Qg2! wins. They give = after 31..Kxe8
Jun-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Game 3; 20th March 1954. MMB had won the first two games so it was 2-0 before this game.

Botvinnik gives 16.g2-g4 an exclam.


click for larger view

...But what about 16...♘f5xd4!! ?
An incredible resource! White's pawn centre is about to be devastated!

Jun-29-18  Howard: The latest edition of the NIC Yearbook states that Smyslov missed a win in this game.

First time, I've read that !

Jun-29-18  Boomie: <offramp: Botvinnik gives 16.g2-g4 an exclam...But what about 16...♘f5xd4!!>

A belated attempt at a partial answer.

After the forced line:

17. Nxd4 fxe5 18. fxe5 Bxe5 19. Rxf8+ Qxf8 20. Be3 Qxb4


click for larger view

Stockfish gives white a slight edge. But with its top line starting with 21. Kg2, you wonder.

My spidey sense tells me that if black can get the central passers moving, he might be winning. If white gives up a piece for the 2 pawns, then black has the outside passer to fall back on. So I would rush to push e5 and d4.

Clearly, a lot of analysis needs to be done to reach a definitive outcome.

Jun-30-18  Howard: My "spidey sense" tells me that 25.a5! would have given White a won position...

...or, at least, that's what the NIC Yearbook states.

Jul-13-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: In game 1 Black had played 9..Nbc6; 9..Bd7 was new. 11 c3 was given an explanation point by Botvinnik but it has not been repeated much. 19..exf 20 gxf..fxe 21 fxg..e4 22 gxh+..Kh8 23 Nh4 would have been losing for Black as he doesn't have time to retake the piece. Wood provided extensive analysis that White would have been winning after 25 exd..Qxe2 26 Bxe2..Rc2 27 a5
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
Match Smyslov!
by amadeus
World Championship Game #3
from WCC Index [Botvinnik-Smyslov 1954] by Suenteus Po
actually not really an IPC *g7/g6/f5/g4
from 56_IPC = Irish Pawn Centre/middlegame-structure by whiteshark
My favorite games from WCC matches
by skytzo985
1954 World Championship Game #3
from Road to the Championship - Vasily Smyslov by suenteus po 147
g3-Botvinnik has triple g-pawns
from WC-Botvinnik-Smyslov trio by kevin86
Game 3, Botvinnik leads 2 1/2-1/2
from 1954 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Bishops and triplets -> equality?!
from chess strategems iv - under construction by gauer
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
estrategia y tactica de suetin
by LESTRADAR
actually not really an IPC *g7/g6/f5/g4
from 56_IPC = Irish Pawn Centre/middlegame-structure by Jaredfchess
WCC: Botvinnik-Smyslov 1954
by WCC Editing Project
Game 143
from Soviet Chess Strategy (Suetin) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC