chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal
Botvinnik - Tal World Championship Match (1960), Moscow URS, rd 10, Apr-05
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch. Closed Variation 7c6 (E88)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 43 more Botvinnik/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: After 46.Ne4, White is threatening 47.Nf6+, forking King and Rook.

If 46.Nxb7, then 46...Rb5 47.Rd1 a4, then 48...Rxb6.

Perhaps 46...Bg7.

After 47.Nf6, White is threatening mate with 48.Rg8 mate.

Perhaps 47...Rd8.

Perhaps Black should preserve his Bishop and play 49...Bd2 or 49...Bc1.

Feb-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Game 10 of the match. Botvinnik clearly had the initiative after having won games 8 and 9 to pull within a point. At the 1958 Portoroz Interzonal Tal, as White, had played 11 h4 against Gligoric but after 11..h5 his attack had stalled. Tal's 11 Nge2 had also been answered by 11..h5 in several previous games with White having responded with 12 g5, 12 h3 and 12 gxh. Botvinnik's pawn sacrifice 12 Bg5 was new. Although apparently the line had been prepared at home Botvinnik had used 47 minutes through the 14th move; twice as much time as Tal. Tal was very critical of 17..a5? because of the weakness it created in his queenside; he recommended 17..Qb6 with the idea of ..Rd8 and ..Qd4. Tal was very impressed by 19 Bf2! offering the exchange of queens though a pawn down feeling that White had a clear advantage at this point. Tal felt that Botvinnik lost his advantage with 23 Nxh5 leaving the e pawn unprotected; he recommended 23 Rb1 instead. 32 Nc4?! allowed Tal to get rid of his backward pawn with 32..f5!. At the end of the first time control Tal was threatening to take the initiative with 40..Bh6 but Botvinnik's 40 Be4! gave him the best chance of maintaining the balance though if Tal had played 41..Rc3! he would have maintained good winning chances. 46 Nxb7..Rb5 47 Ra1 would also have provided good drawing chances but Botvinnik preferred to keep his knight centralized.
Mar-07-11  soothsayer8: Seems to me while looking at these games that Botvinnik was the better endgame player than Tal.
Apr-23-11  bronkenstein: <plang: Game 10 of the match. Botvinnik clearly had the initiative after having won games 8 and 9 to pull within a point. At the 1958 Portoroz Interzonal Tal, as White, had played 11 h4 against Gligoric but after 11..h5 his attack had stalled. Tal's 11 Nge2 had also been answered by 11..h5 in several previous games with White having responded with 12 g5, 12 h3 and 12 gxh. Botvinnik's pawn sacrifice 12 Bg5 was new. Although apparently the line had been prepared at home Botvinnik had used 47 minutes through the 14th move; twice as much time as Tal. Tal was very critical of 17..a5? because of the weakness it created in his queenside; he recommended 17..Qb6 with the idea of ..Rd8 and ..Qd4. Tal was very impressed by 19 Bf2! offering the exchange of queens though a pawn down feeling that White had a clear advantage at this point. Tal felt that Botvinnik lost his advantage with 23 Nxh5 leaving the e pawn unprotected; he recommended 23 Rb1 instead. 32 Nc4?! allowed Tal to get rid of his backward pawn with 32..f5!. At the end of the first time control Tal was threatening to take the initiative with 40..Bh6 but Botvinnik's 40 Be4! gave him the best chance of maintaining the balance though if Tal had played 41..Rc3! he would have maintained good winning chances. 46 Nxb7..Rb5 47 Ra1 would also have provided good drawing chances but Botvinnik preferred to keep his knight centralized.>

Nice .

This game seems to be deeper and more instructive than the number of kibitzers indicates ... though it ended in a draw, therefore it should be dull :)

Another potential positional masterpiece of Botvinnnik , spoiled in time trouble , typical scenario of games in this match ( Tal seemed to agree with this POW in his biography ).

May-22-15  DanielHoseano: But why? Tal had 2 pawns
Dec-20-17  Mazymetric: Black should've avoided the exchange at move 49. As <wwall> have suggested, black should've played 49...Bd2 or 49...Bg7 After 49...Bd2 50.Nxh5 Bc3 51.Rg4 Rd6 52.Rc4 Bd4, white will lose his b-pawn and black is clearly winning.
Dec-20-17  Mazymetric: <wwall: If 46.Nxb7, then 46...Rb5 47.Rd1 a4, then 48...Rxb6.> 48...Rxb6 wouldn't work because 48.Rd7+ Kg8 49.Nc5. If black now plays 49...Rxb6, black would lose his a-pawn and position is about equal. I think, the stronger continuation would be 47...Bf4 48.Ra1 Rxb6 49.Nxa5 Kg6.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 10
from Tal-Botvinnik (Tal) by howardb86
Game 10
from Tal-Botvinnik (Tal) by isfsam
game 10
from Tal-Botvinnik 1960 by PM Peedro
Favorite Tal Games
by CEPG
World Championship Game #10
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
11 - 8
from World Champion Maches Vol. 1 by Nikita Smirnov
Game 10
from Tal-Botvinnik (Tal) by Qindarka
Game 10, Tal leads 5 1/2-4 1/2
from 1960 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
Match Tal!
by amadeus
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC