Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal
Botvinnik - Tal World Championship Match (1960), Moscow URS, rd 4, Mar-22
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation (E27)  ·  1/2-1/2


explore this opening
find similar games 43 more Botvinnik/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-12-03  bunti: This is the fourth game of 1960 World Championship with Tal winning the first game and drawing the next two. By the end of the opening in this game, Botvinnik succeded in moving his pawn to e4 and Tal controled the c file. On 20th move Tal makes questionable move by moving knight to h5 where it is taken out of the game. After Botvinnik begins moving his game out Tal is able to bring knight back into game. Tal writes that instead of 30. Ke2 white should have played f4 with the following possible variation: 30... g6 31. fxg5 Rxb5 32. Nxb5 Ke6 33. Nxa7Kxe5 34. Nc8 where he says white will win the knight endgame. Even after 30. Ke2, Botvinikk still had a slight positional advantage but squandered it away with his two rook moves of 32. Rb1 and 34. Rb4. The game then fizzles out to a draw.
Sep-14-03  drukenknight: does Tal discuss: 37 Rh7+?
Sep-14-03  Sylvester: This game is not in Tal's book. I don't have Tal-Botvinnik, 1960. That may change on my birthday.
Sep-14-03  bunti: <does Tal discuss: 37 Rh7+?> He claims that because of the threat of Rc3+ the move he made was forced.
Sep-18-03  drukenknight: I just not sure where black is going to put his K after Rh7+

I have the 1960 book, perhaps I'll look it up, or maybe bunti just did?

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Botvinnik usually played 4 e3. The Samisch must have been prepared for the match. Rather than playing for a middle game initiative with 17 Ra2 followed by transferring the rook to the f file Botvinnik allowed an endgame where he had a slight advantage. After 20..Nd7 white white would have had rge better endgame with good winning chances. Botvinnik avoided the knight exchange with 21 Ne2 as the rook endings offered few winning chances. He hoped that he could prove the knight on h5 to be misplaced. Tal felt that after 24..Rxc1+ exchanging both pair of rooks followed by 26..g6 and the transferring the knight to e6 he would have had an easy draw. After Botvinnik missed 30 f4! winning the g pawn (if 30..gxf 31 g4 wins the knight) the chances soon leveled and the draw was agreed.
Jul-11-09  WhiteRook48: Botvinnik must like to challenge the b4-bishop one or two moves right after 3...Bb4
Aug-26-11  talisman: <bunti> i don't know where you've gone but you need to come back! thanks for that first post.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: From Tal's book on the match:

8.....Bf5 is an improvement on Capablanca's line 8....c5 9.Bd3 b6 10.Ne2 Ba6, which led to a famous win for Botvinnik in 1938.

There are various complicated ideas for a piece sacrifice if white plays g4 on moves 9 or 10 and black answers with .....Nxg4.

13.Ra2 is sharper than 13.Re1. Tal liked his position after 13......Rc8 14.Re2 Qa5

White also had 14.e5 Nh7 15.f4 when Tal wanted to play 15.....f5.

Tal says that, paradoxically, is rook is better placed on c8 than c2 on move 18 (where it's out of reach of a potential Nf1-e3 maneuver), so he trades queens on d1.

Tal says that he actually saw 30.f4 and thought he would be alright with 30.....g6 31.fxg5 Rxb5 32.Nxb5 Ke6 33.Nxa7 Kxe5 but missed 34.Nc8

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_E24-E29_Nimzo-Indian w/ 4.f3 & Saemisch
by nakul1964
Game 4
from Tal-Botvinnik (Tal) by Qindarka
World Championship Game #4
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
Match Tal!
by amadeus
game 4
from Tal-Botvinnik 1960 by PM Peedro
by radu stancu
Game 4
from Tal-Botvinnik (Tal) by isfsam
Game 4, Tal leads 2 1/2-1 1/2
from 1960 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
from World Champion Maches Vol. 1 by Nikita Smirnov
bunti's favorite games
by bunti
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
Game 4
from TAL VS BOTVINNIK 1960 World Chamionship by howardb86
98_E24-E29_Nimzo-Indian w/ 4.f3 & Saemisch
by whiteshark
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
Favorite Tal Games

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC