Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Mikhail Botvinnik vs Mikhail Tal
"Tricks are for KIDs" (game of the day Oct-25-08)
Tal - Botvinnik World Championship Match (1960)  ·  King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Classical Main Line (E69)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 64 times; par: 75 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 43 more Botvinnik/Tal games
sac: 21...Nf4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-22-11  DrMAL: <ChessYouGood: 14...Rfc8 is the psychological move of the century given the later knight sac.> 14...Rfc8 computes to objectively the best move.

Houdini_15a_x64: 28/62 2:21:33 35,097,537,357
-0.22 14. ... Rfc8 15.Qe2 a6 16.Be3 Qd8
-0.24 14. ... Rfb8 15.Qe2 Qc7 16.Bg5 b5
-0.25 14. ... Rac8 15.Qe2 Qd8 16.Be3 a6

Yes, 23.a3 produces a solid advantage for white so objectively the sac was not sound. 23.Bd2 white's second best produced a slight advantage for black with 23...Be5 but instead he played 23...Qxb2?! giving white an advantage anyway. But then 25.Rxb2? instead of 25.Bxf3 blundered into losing position.

This is not unusual and actually expected in even the highest level of OTB play. With limited time in high pressure positions, as Tal created with his sac and ensuing play, blunders often occur. In this sense the sac was sound as the result also shows.

After 28...Bf4?! (instead of 28...Rxc3!) and later 39...d5?! (instead of 39...Kf7!) Botvinnik was able to prolong the agony before being defeated by his earlier mistakes. Regardless of outcome, the game remains very important in chess history but it also serves here as an illustration of Tal's brilliance!

Dec-30-11  material: Tal is the best
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Botvinnik should have played 25.Bxf3 instead of poor 25.Rxb2?, which gave Tal decisive advantage. For example, after 25.Bxf3 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 27.Rc1 Qb2 28.Bg4 Be5+ 29.Kg2 R8c7 30.Be6+ Kh8 31.Nd1 Qd4 32.Qf3 Kg7 33.Rxc4 Qxc4 34.Qe3 it is white, who has excellent chances to win the game.
May-09-12  erniecohen: <Honda Cervenka> Your line shows that Tal's 23...♕xb2 was also a blunder; 23...♗e5 24. f3 ♕xb2 25. ♘d1 ♕xa1 26 ♖xa1 ♗xa1 leaves Black with a slight edge.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <erniecohen> I would not call it a blunder but it was an inaccuracy in tactically complex and messy position, which could have got Tal into big troubles. Also Botvinnik's 23.Bd2 was inaccurate move and 23.a3 was much better as some kibitzers pointed out here. But despite of that this is a great game.
May-11-12  King Death: Inaccuracies mistakes and outright blunders come in just these kinds of positions, especially when you're facing a human being that was one of the best ever in complex positions. It's one thing to sit behind Fritz 4034 and analyze and a whole different ball game to face your 2700 type opponent when it's just you and him. They could give most of us a day and it wouldn't be enough!
May-15-12  erniecohen: <Honza> <King Death> Just to be clear, when we point out a mistake, it is not to denegrate the game, nor to insult the players, who are obviously far better at chess than we are. It is to get to the truth of a game, to understand what really happened.

It is quite unnecessary to point out that it is easier to analyze a game than to play it, or that it is easier to analyze a game with computers than without them.

I do, however, agree with <Honza> that we have a terminological problem. We use the word "blunder" ambiguusly to mean a move that was (or should have been) very costly, in addition to meaning "he should have known better", since at this level, the latter are very rare. I use the word to mean a move that is likely to cost half or a full point. By this measure, you would have to classify 23...♕xb2 as a blunder. I'm open up to alternative suggestions.

Innacuracy is more like something that is tangibly inferior to an alternative.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <erniecohen> I am not a native English speaker and so I am hardly the most competent person to define terminology in English. But as I understand it, the term "blunder" is stronger and harsher expression than some of its synonyms like "mistake" or "error", not to say "inaccuracy". Thus for me "the blunder" is a poor move, which not only leads (or can lead) to dramatic negative change in overall evaluation of position but which is also wrong for some fairly obvious reason. Of course, at GM level such an obvious reason must not be limited only to something stupid like a piece left en prise, overlooked fork, missed back rank mate or some trivial two- or three-move tactics but it should not be very difficult to find and assess. I think that in this case all objectively inferior moves pointed out in previous comments don't fit to this category because their inferiority and drawbacks were far from obvious, at least for me. On the other hand, the "inaccuracy" for me is just an inferior (but not necessarily bad) move, whose inferiority is at first glance inconspicuous or deeply hidden, or whose consequences are not fatal for the overall evaluation of the position and outcome of the game.
May-16-12  King Death: <Honza Cervenka> Your understanding of the difference between "blunder" and the other terms is just fine. "Inaccuracy" is much more subtle.
May-16-12  erniecohen: <Honza>,<KingDeath>: Okay, I'm good with that. Let's use "error" to mean a move that loses at least half a point, and reserve "blunder" for an error that a player of the level has no excuse in making. (So 23...♕xb2 would probably be a borderline error.) "Inaccuracy" will mean an inferior move with less severe consequences. I don't know what term to use for a less than excusable inaccuracy though, maybe "careless"?
Jun-16-12  rjsolcruz: Castro vs Forcado in Meralco's Father's Day Cup 2012 opened with the same moves up to 6.Nc3.

Nov-08-12  marljivi: In the variation,pointed out by Honza Cervenka,eg.25.Bf3Bb1 26.Rb1Qc2 27.Rc1Qb2 28.Bg4Be5 29.Kg2,and isn't it now so,that 29...Rc3 is the correct move? (30.Rc3Rc3 31.Bc3Qe2 32.Be2Bc3 and black is a pawn up,although white should still draw this position.)
Nov-14-12  scorpion2a: OK, I made a deep search for an analysis to this move: Why not 24.Bxf3

It turns out that where some state that the Bxf3 line might have been OK for white I have to disagree. After 24.Bxf3 Bxb1 25.Rxb1 Qc2 26.Be4 black has the resource of 26...Be5+ by tempo and then 27...Rxe4 and winning the rook on b1 if 28.Nxe4.

If indeed Botvinnik went for 28.Nxe4 there is no 29.Nxd6 because the black dark-sqr bishop on e5 is now defending it and also blocking the queen of penetrating into the position of black. Also there is no f4 due the brilliant Bxf4+, winning the position completely. So black is better in that position.

This was just the Tal show!

Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <scorpion2a> To summarize from Tal's book on the 1960 World Championship match (see the full quote by <dragon40> on p.1, Botvinnik vs Tal, 1960) Tal indicated that he thought that White had nothing better than 25.Bxf3 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 27.Rc1 Qb2 28.Rb1 and a draw by repetition and that Botvinnik shared that opinion. At this point in the match Botvinnik was down a point and, with the White pieces and a piece up (for 3 pawns) in an unclear position probably felt that he could (and needed to) do better than a draw by repetition. As Tal said "The psychological aspect of this [the exchange of queens] is fully understandable: having an extra piece and being under attack, it is always more pleasant to get rid of your opponent's Queen."

And as <dragon40> indicated in his quote from the book, a few days after the game GM Salo Flohr showed that after 25.Bxf3 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 instead of 27.Rc1 White has 27.Be4 so that if 27...Rxe4 28.Nxe4. If instead 27...Be5+ as you suggested (note: I corrected your move numbering, you were off by one move), then instead of 28.f4 Bxf4+ White has 28.Kg2. Houdini 1.5a then indicates that Black's best is 28...Rxe4 29.Nxe4 Qxb1 30.Nxd6 (this IS possible even though the DSB is "defending" the pawn) 30...Bxd6 31.Qe6+ Kg7 32.Qd7+ Kg8 33.Qxc8+ Bf8 34.Qe6+ Kg7 35.Bc3+ Kh6 36.d6 Qf5 (otherwise Black will have to give up his bishop even sooner to prevent the d-pawn from queening) 37.Qxf5 gxf5 38.Be5 Kg5 39.d7 Be7 40.Bc7, evaluating the resulting position at [+4.43], d=26 since Black will have to give up his bishop for White's new queen, with an easy win for White. And the entire continuation looks pretty much forced.

click for larger view

But, yes this game was just the Tal show since neither player likely saw this continuation.

Dec-14-12  fokers13: <AylerKupp> your first line(28.Nxe4) leads to an easily drawn fair game of DSB where white eventually attains an extra pawn he can make no use of.
Apr-05-13  adrboliveira: When we see matches masters of that time, the most refutable is the need of computers. Perhaps only to study but never disprove the talents, not even put in doubt his brilliant moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Tal notes that he started to consider ideas for the knight sacrifice at about move 14 -- although at that point it was "still hazy."

If 23.a3 Qb3 24.Bxa7 Be5 25.Bf3 Tal planned to sacrifice his queen with 25.....b6 26.Qd1 Qxb2 27.Ra2 Rxc3 28.Rxb2 Rxc1 and if 29.Qd2 Be4! is killing while if 29.Qe2 R8c3 gives black a strong attack.

Tal thought that the game should have continued 23....Be5 24.f3 Qxb2 25.Nd1 Qd4 26.Rxc4 Rxc4 27.Rc1 Rxc1 28.Bxc1 Qxd5 29.Bf1 with a complicated game.

23....Qxb2 is basically a draw offer since after 24.Rab1 f3 25.Bxf3 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 white can take a draw by repetition with 27.Rc1. Botvinnik didn't like it because he thought black had 27....Qf5 which doesn't work, and both players missed Flohr's idea of 27.Be4 Rxe4 28.Nxe4 Qxc1 29.Nxd6 Rf8 30.Qe6+ Kh8 31.Nf7+ when white's better in the endgame.

Tal says that his technique is a bit sloppy. He should have played 37....Kg7 and missed white's idea of 39.Ra3 and if 39....Bxe2 40.Re3+.

Sep-04-14  James Tal: Nice Game....
Premium Chessgames Member
  DrGridlock: <Analysis by Rybka reveals that Be5 is NOT Black's best continuation in this line at move 24.

click for larger view
Black's best continuation is Ra8. This is an option I have never before seen mentioned or analyzed. I'll post Rybka's analysis later, but leave as an open challenge to others to find White's best response in this line. Here are the ground rules - no computers. Try to find White's response "over the board." There is only one reply which maintains an advantage for White.>

25 Nb5 is White's only move to maintain an advantage in the 23 a3 variation above.

Komodo gives:

1. (1.14):
25.Nb5 Rxc1
26.Rxc1 f3
27.Bxf3 Be5+
28.Kg2 Bd3
29.Qe3 Qxb5
30.Bd4 Be2
31.Bxe5 Bxf3+
32.Qxf3 dxe5
33.Rc2 Qd7
34.d6 Qxd6
35.Qxb7 Rf8
36.Rc8 Rxc8
37.Qxc8+ Kg7
38.Qb7+ Kh6
39.b4 Qd2
40.Qf3 Qg5+

Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: The *real* game of the century.
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Spectacular play by Tal.
Jan-10-15  thegoodanarchist: <Honza Cervenka: <erniecohen> I am not a native English speaker and so I am hardly the most competent person to define terminology in English. But as I understand it, the term "blunder" is stronger and harsher expression than some of its synonyms like "mistake" or "error", not to say "inaccuracy".>

Absolutely correct. Blunder almost implies that "you should have seen it! What were you thinking??"

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: A great game. It taught me that piece activity, and having the initiative, are crucial chess factors. They also make the game more fun to play.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: <piece activity, and having the initiative are crucial chess factors.> So undeniably true <offramp> the psychological edge grows exponentially from a long lasting initiative.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Alex Schindler: Great pun, referencing both the opening and botvinnik 's disparagement of tal's playing style. Magic tricks, as it turned out!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. Don't post personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Botvinnik is attacked relentlessly in a WCC game!
from The Greatest Games of all Time by addiction to chess
Game 6, Tal leads 4-2
from 1960 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
king's indian defense
from benjobench's tal games by benjobench
reduxe's favorite games
by reduxe
Botvinnik-Tal World Championship Match 1960
from Tal's Tournament and Matches 1949-1973 by jessicafischerqueen
Tal vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Mikhail Tal: 8th official worldchampion: 1 year
from All the worldchampions. by nikolaas
World Championship Match , 1960 #6 (21....Nf4!?)
from Mikhail Tal: Selected Games by wanabe2000
Tactics - 1
by obrit
An incredible speculative sacrifice by Tal
from Reisswolf's Favourite Games by Reisswolf
game 6
from Tal-Botvinnik 1960 by PM Peedro
Tal-Botvinnik "Tricks are for KIDs" (GOTD Oct-2 Rd.6
from Mikhail Nekhemevich the Eighth by wanabe2000
World's Greatest Chess Games- Nunn Emms Burgess
by Rookpawn
Game of the day 4
by vikinx
Kings Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation
by DHW
Digest Games
by npchess
Game 39
from Guess-the-Move Chess: 1960-1979 (Part 1) by Anatoly21
all hail tal's favorite games
by all hail tal
Tal's knight sac shocker, 6th game of the World Championship
from Evolution of Chess games by wvkevin
Great example of Psychological crushing of opponents!
from Karnatakiaditya's favorite games by Karnatakiaditya
plus 107 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies