chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Tal - Botvinnik World Championship Rematch (1961), Moscow URS, rd 10, Apr-10
Caro-Kann Defense: Advance. Tal Variation (B12)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 69 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 43 more Tal/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-28-06  Runemaster: An unusual game. Neither side moved its queen rook and the Black kingside pieces were very slow to come out.

This was played in the era of adjournments, which I find a bit annoying. As is often the case, I would have liked to see White fight on here, rather than resign after adjournment analysis.

Overall, the game is another good example of Botvinnik's ability to reinvent himself. It's true that Tal's health was bad at this time, but B was 50 years old and had been badly beaten in the previous years' match.

Botvinnik found openings that Tal didn't combat well, particularly the Caro-Kann as in this game. Above all, B managed to reach the general type of position, especially queenless ones, where he was much stronger, while avoiding the sort of attacking positions in which Tal excelled.

This always makes me think of Kramnik in the 2000 match; he managed to regularly take the games into queenless positions that neutralised Kasparov's strengths and emphasised his own.

Jul-28-06  euripides: <This was played in the era of adjournments, which I find a bit annoying.> It was really very inconsiderate behaviour to play chess before 1990. Couldn't they have waited ?
Jul-28-06  paladin at large: <Runemaster> Thanks for the game and comments - Botvinnik really seems to have Tal off balance from 14.....b4 onward.
Jul-30-06  talisman: 9.bishop-e3?? for white?
Jul-31-06  Runemaster: <euripides> <It was really very inconsiderate behaviour to play chess before 1990. Couldn't they have waited ?> Fischer obviously agreed with you - he waited until 1992.
Oct-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Why does white resign here? Sure, black is better, up a pawn and more space, but is there a clear win for black that white should resign?
Oct-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pyke: <Breunor> Botvinnik himself writes in his annotations after 38. ... Bf5:

"Black unhesitatingly gives up his g5 pawn, since the passed f3 pawn is not dangerous. The outcome will be decided by the breakthrough of his pawns on the queenside,which White is unable to avoid."

Hope this helps where to look. Also, as mentioned earlier, the game was adjourned in the final position, so Botvinnik had time to find the best plan for Black to convert his advantage.

This was the 10th game, played on 10th April 1961. With this win Botvinnik increased his lead to 6,5 - 3,5.

Oct-07-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Thanks Pyke!

Apr-02-10  Chess Network: Science chess! :)
May-01-10  shreyaslathi: ??? what are adjournment rules !!
May-01-10  Open Defence: in the old days games were adjourned and resumed the next day...
May-18-12  polarx: <Runemaster: Botvinnik found openings that Tal didn't combat well, particularly the Caro-Kann as in this game.>

Caro-Kann was played 6 times in the 1960 WC Match.
3 draws. Botwinnik won 1 game. Tal won 2 games.

Caro-Kann was played 9 times in the 1961 WC Return Match. 5 draws. Botwinnik won 2 games. Tal won 2 games.

According to CG.com's database, runemaster is not right.

Apr-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <polarx: <Runemaster: Botvinnik found openings that Tal didn't combat well, particularly the Caro-Kann as in this game.> Caro-Kann was played 6 times in the 1960 WC Match.
3 draws. Botwinnik won 1 game. Tal won 2 games.

Caro-Kann was played 9 times in the 1961 WC Return Match. 5 draws. Botwinnik won 2 games. Tal won 2 games.

According to CG.com's database, runemaster is not right.>

I don't think he's wrong. +1 over 15 games is not exactly what you look for with White.

Jan-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Very strange game -- both sides' positions look horrible out of the opening.

I guess 5....Bd7 is necessary to avoid 5....Bh7 6.e6.

I don't understand 6.h5 at all although apparently it's standard in this line. 6.c4 looks good instead.

8.Bh3 looks dubious; why not 8.Bg2 or 8.Na3?

9.Be3 is probably a mistake. 9.Ne2 looks very natural.

Botvinnik plays very aggressively on the queenside with ....Na5, ....b5, and ....b4, which works out well.

Tal's combination with 20.Ne5 is pretty but he puts his best piece out of play and untangles black's kingside for him. 20.Ke2 followed by Rhc1 and Ne5 might have been better.

23.d5 is probably necessary to keep black's knight from coming to d5.

White's almost in zugzwang in the position after 28.....Bh7 but he can repeat with 29.Nf7+ and Ne5 and I don't really see how black makes progress: maybe bring the king to f8/g8 and the knight to b5 or move the knight and bishop and try to bring the king to f4? Tal prefers to sacrifice a pawn instead.

In the final position black can play ....b5 then ....Re8, trade rooks on the e-file, trade the knight for bishop on d4, then play ....Bb1 provoking a3 and ideally play ....c3 with check followed by ....bxa3. One way or another he'll get a couple of passed pawns.

Feb-16-14  Marmot PFL: I would have played this out myself, but for a player in bad health it might take too much energy.
Jun-13-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: If you let Shredder run forever in the final position it produces a valuation of more than -4 though the variations don't make a lot of sense. Eventually, as noted by zydeco, Black winds up with a couple of passed pawns on the queenside (or wins a piece).

Botvinnik's notes are interesting but spare. After 5....Bh7 he indeed feared 6.e6 and cited a Gufeld-Spiridonov game that went 6....fxe6 7.Bd3 Bxd3 8.Qxd3 Qd6 9.f4. It doesn't seem to be in the database.

He sniffs that 9.Be3 is <inconsistent. to say the least> and says that White should have considered 10.f4 followed by Nf3. Of 10.Qb3 he writes <Usually Tal avoids the exchange of queens, but here he changed his habit, and wrongly so, since in the given situation the exchange favors black.> After 10....cxd4 11.Qxb6 was forced to avoid losing a pawn after 12.cd Bb4+.

In the game, after 12....Na5:

<But now, of course, Black avoids the win of a pawn (12....Nb4 13.Kd2 Rxa2 Rxa2 Nxa2) since the initiative would have passed to the opponent. Instead of this he rapidly advances the b-pawn, initiating the plan Capablanca demonstrated in his encounter with Janowski (1916). This game was given by the third World Champion in <My Chess Career>.>

Janowski vs Capablanca, 1916

Botvinnik doesn't follow Capablanca for long, however.

13.Nc3 b5 14.Bf1 b4

<14....Nc4 could also have been played, but Black has no objection to the white knight occupying an insecure position on b5 and even penetrating to d6. All this will merely assist the mobilization of Black's forces.>

After 16.....Nc4 Botvinnik says that he again rejected the win of the a2 pawn (16....Nb3 17.Rb1 Rxa2) <since it would be hard for Black to bring his bishop at f8 into play.>

Of 20.Ne5, he says White appears to be creating complications, but in the end it all reduces to further simplification. He also says that 23.d5 is forced to prevent an immediate pawn breakthrough on the queenside.

Botvinnik doesn't comment, but Shredder agrees with Zydeco that 29.Nf7+ and Ne5 is stronger than Tal's pawn sacrifice.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
No rook moves
from Unusual themes III by SwitchingQuylthulg
Botvinnik's Best Games 1947-1970
by uglybird
Match Botvinnik!
by chessgain
29
from B12 (Seirawan) by Chessdreamer
Botvinnik
from A tale of two Mikhails by Open Defence
Game 145
from Soviet Chess (Soltis) by Qindarka
Caro-Kann, Advance Variation
by Chessdreamer
5 Carolina Luves Fredthebear
by fredthebear
20 - 21
from World Champion Maches Vol. 1 by Nikita Smirnov
Game 10, Botvinnik leads 6 1/2-3 1/2
from 1961 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Rookington's Classical Caro-Kahn
by rookington
Match Botvinnik!
by amadeus
Botvinnik
from The Caro-Kann According to ... by parisattack
Match Tal!
by amadeus
Botvinnik vs World Champions Decisive Games Tal
from Botvinnik vs the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Tal vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
m2g10--Bot wins big,with the dark pieces
from WC-Tal- Botvinnik-the title exchange by kevin86
botvinnik best games
by brager


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC