chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Leonard William Barden vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Hastings (1961/62), Hastings ENG, rd 5, Dec-31
French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,180 more games of Botvinnik
sac: 21...Kf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-14-08  CaptainEvans: 16...♖xd3 (with 17...♕h4) would've been better than 16...♖c8 I'd've thought. If so, it's comforting for struggling club players like me that Botvinnik can miss a tactic. Botvinnik was brave to play 19...f6 with the resultant exchange sac. On move 31 Barden lashed out with ♖xc5 which I reckon was unnecessary. Finally the pawn race on move 31 would have led to a mate in two for Botvinnik had Barden continued pushing his a-pawn.
Feb-14-08  dabearsrock1010: The player with the white pieces will probably best be remembered as the great actor in the movie no country for old men
Mar-06-10  Cibator: Obviously White couldn't find a draw during adjournment analysis, even with the advantage of a sealed move that had a forced reply by Black.

Barden himself has said that he "missed a clear winning chance" in this game, but without giving any details. Can anyone spot what he may have been talking about?

Mar-06-10  Pyke: < dabearsrock1010: The player with the white pieces will probably best be remembered as the great actor in the movie no country for old men>

NO - That was Javier Bardem ...

Feb-26-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Houdini 3 is (I think rightly) very unimpressed with this game. Botvinnik should have played 16...Rxd3 17.Qxd3 Qh4!, forking White's bishop and the pawn on f2. Houdini then gives as best 18.Ne4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qxf2+ 20.Kh1 Nf4 21.Rxf4 Qxf4 22.Rd1 Qd4 23.Qxd4 Bxd4 24.Rxd4 Bxb5 25.Bc5 a6 26.Bb6 O-O with large advantage to Black, who is two pawns up - though there are bishops of opposite colors. Later, 32...c4 (rather than 32...axb6 33.Qxb6 c4 large advantage B) was a big mistake. Rather than 33.Qb4??, White should have played the obvious 33. bxa7!, when Houdini gives as best 33...cxb3 34.Rxc8 Bxc8 35.a8=Q Qh8 36.Qxd5+ Be6 37.Qxe4 Qa1 38.Qxf4+ Kg7 39.h3 b2 40.Qd4+ Kf7 41. Qf4+ with a draw by perpetual. My guess is that Barden was in time pressure and didn't have enough time to work out the consequences of 33.bxa7.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Hastings 1961/62
by suenteus po 147
French - Advance/Tarrasch/Exchange/etc
by gmann
Exchange sacs - 2
by obrit


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC