chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Henrique Mecking vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Hastings (1966/67), Hastings ENG, rd 7, Jan-04
Dutch Defense: Leningrad. Warsaw Variation (A88)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 1 time; par: 76 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,180 more games of Botvinnik
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-17-02  bishop: Botvinnik manouvered his knights smartly,forcing Mecking to give up his kings' bishop for one of them, play In the semi-open position that followed favored the bishops.The vulnerability of the d5 pawn contributed to Whites' downfall.
Dec-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: This game is a joy to observe, Botvinnik just takes control.
Dec-06-04  drukenknight: the Dutch, it's not dead. It's, it's sleeping. Yeah, that's it. It's sleeping.
Apr-24-07  Helios727: Didn't Botvinnik retire after losing the crown in 1963?
Apr-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Botvinnik still played in tournaments until he retired in 1970 but he didn't participate in further events for the World Crown although he was automatically seeded into the 1965 candidates as ex-champion as the return match clause had been abolished.
Jul-06-09  Sir Geoffrey: If you're playing as Black and badly needed to win, then play 3...f5 as the former world chess champion did. Of course Black could also play 3...Nf6 which could transpose into a Gruenfeld defence. Both moves of which put pressure on e4.
Dec-29-10  jerseybob: Sir Geoffrey: 3..Nf6 would transpose to a King's Indian. It would only become a Grunfeld if black added a further d5.
Sep-01-11  druknight: I think Mecking messes this up around move 40. It's not in the chesslab database so dont have a computer handy, but the problem seems to be Rook vs King. white can build a fort but blacks B makes this problematical, but in any event white doesnt need the g pawn and must dispose it.

For blacks K it is more a question of corresponding squares vs white Rook. One of space...

It's odd, a fortress, a disposable pawn, space....

what if Mecking goes 40 Rf8 Bf3 41 g4...

Sep-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <druknight>

<40.Rf8 Bf3 41.g4> then 41...h4, right?

Sep-02-11  tonsillolith: Why not <36...Bf3 37. Rf7#>?
Sep-03-11  druknight: keypush: I guess then 42 g5 is kinda forced...? [disclaimer: no computers were used in the making of this move]
Sep-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: 22.Qa3? seems to be the culprit. He could have continued as he did later with 22.Qxa7 Bxb2 23.Rxd5 Bxd5 and Black does not have Ra4 etc.
Sep-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <druknight: keypush: I guess then 42 g5 is kinda forced...? [disclaimer: no computers were used in the making of this move]>

42...Rh1#.

Sep-03-11  druknight: How I get myself involved in Meckings problems? Now I have to set this up...
Sep-04-11  druknight: ok yeah there seems no way to saeve him at that pt.

Look at move 34 he needs to add pressure to white's K as he is slight material disadvantage. Although Ra1 looks natural it is not the most direct. What if:

34 Rd4 Bf5
35 Nb4

in order to put N on d5 to hit K and pawn and keep the K at bay. Does that work?

Oct-04-11  screwdriver: druknight, no that does not work. If white plays 33 Rd4, black simply responds with 33...Rb1+ 34.Kh2 Bf3, defending the e4 square and threatening mate with 35.Rh1#.
Jan-10-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Wow, Hastings 1066! I knew Botvinnik was a grisled veteran, but I had no idea!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Shocking Brazilian disasters
by Gottschalk
Mikhail Botvinnik's Best Games
by dcruggeroli
Hastings 1966/67
by suenteus po 147
Shocking Brazilian disasters
by Retarf
dutch defense warsaw
by deverteu
my favorites
by Caissa4ever
Mikhail Botvinnik's Best Games
by KingG
chocobonbon's favorite games
by chocobonbon
Basman Hastings 1966/67
by skware
GOOD STILL TODAY
by Imohthep
GOOD STILL TODAY Compiled by Imohthep
by fredthebear
W1 A88 0-1 42
from Dallas, The Big D is Blue by fredthebear
Black Wins Dutch Leningrad (A88) (elo>2500)
by Deep Breath


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC