chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Duncan Suttles
Belgrade (1969), rd 15, Dec-??
Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation (A42)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,180 more games of Botvinnik
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Very subtle ( no pun intended )play by Botvinnik to beat Suttles here.
Dec-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: 22..Ng3+? straightens out White's ♙s for no apparent reason. 22..Rc4!? looks slightly better for Black.
Jun-25-08  Jesspatrick: With 22...Ng3+ evidently Suttles overestimated his chances on the light squares on the Kingside. In ten short moves, he was looking at a lost Rook ending.
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: Botvinnik annotated this game in Chess Informant 8/122. He gives 22...Ng3+ a question mark and recommends 23...Rc4. If 23...Rc4, what is best for White? Perhaps 23.Ng5.

In the game, he gives 25.Rf3 a question mark, then analyzes two other variations. The first one, he writes 25.b3?! Rxe4 26.Rxe4 Bxf1 27.Ne6+ Kg8 28.Qb2 Ne5 29.Rxe5, then gives it the symbol, which means White has a decisive advantage. But it doesn't look like any advantage after 29...dxe5 30.Qxe5 Kf7. He then analyzes 25.Bxf1 26.Ne6+ Rxe6 27.dxe6 and says White has the upper hand. But Black looks OK after 27...d5 28.Qb2+ d4 29.exf7 Bb5.

In the game, instead of 26...Qb4, he writes that 26...Bf5 27.Nxf5+ gxf5 28.Rb3 Qc7 29.Nc3 is equal. It looks like 29...Rxe1+ 30.Qxe1 b6 should draw.

In the game, he gives 30...Bf5 a question mark. He then analyzes two moves. He writes that after 30...Re7 (which one?) 31.Nf6! is decisive. It must be 30...Rce7, since 31.Nxd6 Rxe3 32.Nxe8+ Rxe8 33.Rxe8 wins for White. But if it were 30...Ree7, then 31.Nxd6? Rxe3 32.Rxe3 Nxd6 wins for Black. Botvinnik gives 30...h5 an exclamation mark and writes 31.Nf2 Rxe3 32.Rxe3 Rc1+ 33.Kg2 Kf8 with only slight advantage for White. But it looks like White has a strong advantage after 34.Nxg4 hxg4 35.a3 and 36.Ne6.

Instead of 34...Kg6, is 34...Rd7, threatening 35...Rxd5 any better?

Instead of 38.Rd6, is 38.Rh6, threatening Rxh7+ stronger?

Botvinnik give 41.Kh3 an exclamation point, but isn't 41.Rxb7 just as good?

After 41.Kh3 Ra5, he writes that 41...Rd2 42.a4 Kc6 43.Rf7 is strong for White.

Instead of 42...b5, perhaps 42...Rxa2 43.Rxb7 Ke6 would give Black more resistance.

Instead of 46.Ra7, perhaps stronger is 46.g5, aiming for g6 and g7 to win.

Botvinnik analyses the ending, saying that after 53.Rxg8 a4 54.Ke5 Kc4 55.Rc8+ (wouldn't 55.f5 be better and faster) Kd3 56.f5 b3 57.f6 b2 58.Rb8 a3 59.f7 a2 60.f8=Q and wins for White.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 81
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by nakul1964
Game 81
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by roberm28
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
botvinnik best games
by brager
Power Chess - Botvinnik
by Anatoly21
Mikhail Botvinnik's Best Games
by dcruggeroli
Game 81
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by demirchess
Game 81
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Game 229
from number 3 by Frodo7
Game 81
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
GOOD STILL TODAY
by Imohthep
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Suttles loses to world champions (former, curren
by lentil
Mikhail Botvinnik's Best Games
by KingG
Game 81
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 81
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by AdrianP
GOOD STILL TODAY Compiled by Imohthep
by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC