chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
David Bronstein vs Miguel Najdorf
Budapest Candidates (1950), Budapest HUN, rd 5, Apr-18
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation (E29)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 48 times; par: 27 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Bronstein/Najdorf games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-21-03  kostich in time: Its hard to believe that Bronstiens sudden advance,f4,f5,f6!! wasnt prepared Soviet analysis, especially in light of the very similar Botvinnik-Reshevsky game
Jun-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: bronstein never seemed to be one to follow prepared analysis
Sep-01-05  Resignation Trap: Botvinnik had this to say in his personal notebook on Bronstein: "Nimzo-Indian with a3. It ended up the same as in [Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1948 ], except that 'Br' did not play Be3, but 0-0 and f4. This is apparently the simplest, since it is not so advantageous for Black to reply ...f5. Najdorf played the nightmarish ...Ba6, on f5 - ...e5, and after f5-f6 he lost without a squeak. Even so 'Br' played very accurately, although his opponent made things easy for him."
Sep-01-05  aw1988: Very nice- what's the losing move?
Sep-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <aw1988> 21...resigns :-)
Sep-01-05  aw1988: You may be right; I see no forced win.
Sep-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Meeting e4 with ... Ne8 works, but only if you meet f4 with ... f5 Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1948 instead of 11 ... Ba6?! here. Once White advances e4 & f4 for nothing, Black dies a quick death on the Kingside.
Sep-01-05  Steppenwolf: After Qd7 (to protect f7), I dont see a forced win for white. If white move the bishop to attack h7 (and move the bishop where?), The black rook just goes back on g7. Seems like a draw. What am I missing?
Sep-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: Well, jokes put aside, the threat is 22.Bf8 Rg7 23.Bxg7 Kxg7 24.Qh6 with mate. So, 21...Ng7 seems forced. Then, 22.Qh4 and the threat of moving the Bishop away (threatening mate) then wins a piece, as Black must interpose with 23...Nh5. Seems reason enough for resigning to me. :-)
Sep-01-05  aw1988: It's a strange position, probably the only Nimzo-Indian of its kind. Black's pieces are horribly cramped of course, but what can White do? Maybe g2-g4-g5-even g6?
Sep-01-05  aw1988: Whoa, two more kibitzes just popped up while I was typing.
Sep-01-05  aw1988: Very nice analysis- not even considered--!!, though ideally I never have been very accurate through "brief glances".
Sep-01-05  Steppenwolf: Missed Bf8! completely. Thanks guys.
Sep-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <tpstar> You are The Phantom Of Chessgames.com :-)
Sep-01-05  Steppenwolf: Sorry, The Alchemist, but after Ng7 Qh4, "the threat of moving the Bishop away" would (might) fail to black's h5!? So maybe Ng7 is a good move!
Sep-01-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <Steppenwolf> I am reposting this, as I have missed it before. So, 21...Ng7 (forced) 22.Qh4 Nb3 (for example) 23.Be3 h5 24.Qxh5 Nxh5 25.Rxh5 Kg7 26.Bh6 Kh8 27.Bf8 mate.

So, Black must give the piece with 23...Nh5 and after 24.Qxh5 he can resign with a clear conscience.

Jul-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Didn't Najdorf know that Capablanca had invented the idea of meeting White's e4 and f4 push in this Nimzo-Indian line with ... ♘e8 and ... f5?

Maybe ... f5 was not all that desirable in this particular position but surely it must have been better than allowing 12 f5 and 13 f6, losing in 21 moves.

May-08-17  edubueno: 11...f5! es mucho mejor que 11...Aa6??
12...Ca5! es mucho mejor que 12...e5??
15...g6! es mucho mejor que 15...gxf6??
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch (E29) 1-0 Q&R battery on h-file
from How d'ya spEll Hipoptamus? Is that 1 'p' or 2? by fredthebear
Brilliant Miniatures Compiled by KingG
by fredthebear
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch (E29) 1-0 Q&R battery on h-file
from White Ne2 Waved to Fredthebear by fredthebear
Nimzo-Indian, Rubinstein Variation
by KingG
f5-f6 sacrifice
from Attacking Themes by KingG
David Bronstein's Best Games
by KingG
Ch. 7 A Battering Ram on the f-file
from The Giants of Power Play by Neil McDonald by hms123
Game 161
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by Qindarka
white plays f4, f5 & f6 to open f-file
from 01 - Nimzoindian, Samisch by Penangite
Doubled Pawns
from Instructive Middlegames by Rio Mike
4
from Winning Chess Middlegames by jakaiden
Ch. 7 A Battering Ram on the f-file opens the g-file
from g-pawn/file demolitions grapple w/Fredthebear by fredthebear
Round 5, Budapest Candidates (1950)
from Game collection: DB by fredthebear
d4 : Nimzo-Indian Defense : Saemisch
by ISeth
Round Five
from Bronstein at the Budapest Candidates 1950 by WCC Editing Project
Ch. 7 A Battering Ram on the f-file opens the g-file
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by fredthebear
round 5
from WCC Index [Budapest 1950] by nescio2
Blunders by Black make it easy.
from Bronstein's Picturesque Games by Brown
Game 8
from The Nimzo-Indian Defence (Gligoric) by Chessdreamer
Yardbird's favorite games
by Yardbird
plus 20 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC