chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
David Bronstein vs Gideon Stahlberg
Budapest Candidates (1950), Budapest HUN, rd 8, Apr-24
French Defense: Alekhine-Chatard Attack. Breyer Variation (C13)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Bronstein/Stahlberg games
sac: 9...cxd4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-01-05  Resignation Trap: Round eight, and Bronstein's second loss in this tournament! Things were not looking so well for Devik.

Here is Botvinnik's summary of this game: "French, Chatard. Stahlberg went in for a dubious exchange (rook?) sacrifice. 'Br' did not risk clinging on to the material, evidently fearing a preparation, and played for simplification. If Stahlberg had played 18...gxf6, things would have been unclear. After this 'Br' played very subtly, undermined the central position of the knight, and by the time scramble had faint winning chances. When Stahlberg 'offered' a draw by repetition of moves, 'Br' began playing 'for a win', in time trouble made a mistake, an oversight, and lost. Thus, after a surprise in the opening, he lacks strength in time trouble - and makes mistakes!"

Aug-14-07  amntony: A good demonstration of the blocking nature of the French Defence and using the knight aggressively by Stahlberg :-)
Jun-04-09  sfm: The 'repetition of moves' is probably after 42.-,Nd6, where White could play safe with 43.Rd3,Ne5 etc. I think 34.R1f2 may be the losing mistake, it should have been 34.R5f2
Mar-10-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: Botvinnik, in his notes to Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1954, suggests an exchange sacrifice for Black at move 17. He adds: "Admittedly, even then it is not so easy to occupy the d5-square with a knight, which is essential if one is to have any hope of fighting successfully with Q + K against Q + R (with the exposed white king). Incidentally, successful exchange sacrifices of this type have occurred a number of times in the games of Stahlberg."

I haven't been able to find any Stahlberg games that fit this description exactly, but this one is close--in the position at move 24, he has a powerful knight at d4 (instead of d5) and an exposed White king as compensation for the Exchange.


click for larger view

A knight on d4 (for Black) is of course even better than one on d5--perhaps the quote (from the New in Chess book on the Botvinnik-Smyslov matches) includes an error in translating from descriptive notation?

May-31-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: 32.Rdf4 is overambitious and 34.R1f2 is a terrible mistake: Bronstein somehow didn't realize how fast the d-pawn would move. Almost any other move should hold.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
C13 im Aljechin-Chartard-Angriff
from 60_Exchange sacrifice in the corner by whiteshark
A good demonstration of occupying the center with pawns
from Flashback to the Summer of 19XY by fredthebear
96e The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 5
by whiteshark
The French
by Zhbugnoimt
round 8
from WCC Index [Budapest 1950] by nescio2
Round Eight
from Bronstein at the Budapest Candidates 1950 by WCC Editing Project
A good demonstration of occupying the center with pawns
from French Defence by amntony
dannieray's favorite games
by dannieray
French Alekhine-Chatard Attack. Breyer (C13) 0-1 Time trouble
from French Chigorin 2.Qe2 and A-Chatard Gambit Attck by fredthebear
Chapter 4: The Exchange
from The Middlegame by Max Euwe by kmchess
French (Tarrach,Classical,exchange....)
by superuser171
IGM Gideon Ståhlberg
by 64rutor
Chapter 4: The Exchange
from The Middlegame by Max Euwe by eternalloss
Endgames
by obrit
Qxe7 in the Alekhine for central domination
from Ideas In The French Defense by oao2102


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC