chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Alexander Cherepkov vs David Bronstein
USSR Championship 1961a (1961), Moscow URS, rd 19, Feb-10
Spanish Game: Open Variations (C80)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 21 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Cherepkov/Bronstein game
sac: 30...e2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  mig55: 34...e1Q
35. Kg2/Qg4
36. Qg8/ Qh3

usw....

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  VargPOD: I found 30...e2, and followed it to 34.g3 e1Q+ and thought that was it. The underpromotion looks like a whole different part. Not a very good puzzle, I think.
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Bronstein annotated this game in "The sorceror's apprentice". It seems that both players were in severe time trouble during the last ten moves or so. Some of his points:

1) 30.Rd5 was a bad mistake. 30.Rd1 probably leads to a draw, but neither player was interested in drawing.

2) 34.Rd1 exd1Q+ 35.Bxd1 Qd2 36.g3 Qxd1+ 37.Kg2 Qd8 38.h4 would have given WWhite slight chances to draw.

3) 34...e1Q+ would have won easily, but in time trouble Bronstein went for a series of forcing checks. He gives the line 34...e1Q+ 35.Kg2 Qg4 36.Rd8 Qh3+ 37.Kf3 Qh1+ 38.Ke3 Qe6+ (in a slight typo, which queen is not specified).

4) White could have won with 39.Qf4+ g5 40.Rd6+ Bxd6 41.Qxd6+ Kg7 42.Qe5+ Kg6 43.Qe6+ Kg7 44.Qf5 Nxa2 45.Qxg5+ Kf7 46.Qxh5+, when his passed pawns should triumph once the queens come off. White missed 39...Kxh5!, thinking that 39..gxf5 40.Qe6+ winning was forced.

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  TrueBlue: well, e2 was obvious, the rest is just technique.
Dec-15-06  MenisfromVenis: Thought 30...exf2+ was the winner (Q + R under attack, so start with a check). Should have known it was too simple.
Dec-15-06  dakgootje: Awwwww missed Bc2, so got the general idea and first moves, but far from solving it
Dec-15-06  CoryLetain: After e2 I couldn't tell if black could escape the coming queeen check. I did finnaly decide on e2 and got pretty far but I didn't see the underpromotion. Wow.
Dec-15-06  zb2cr: I hesitated to play 30. ... e2, since it gave White the capture of the Rook with check. I couldn't follow it all the way. So I tried 30. ... exf2+.
Dec-15-06  manbot: amazingly i actually found this. although i wasnt sure it was going to be right be cuase i didnt see quite far enough. but i still couldnt find anyhting better.
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <TrueBlue: well, e2 was obvious, the rest is just technique.> Yeah, same here.

Some techniques just take longer. Months maybe.

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  who: <Good Evening: I don't think anyone can say they got it right if they didn't see the underpromotion seven moves into the combination. That's why I rejected 30...e2 in favor of 30...exf2+. Weird thing is, it might work (of course, I'm working without the benefit of a chessboard or software, as usual). 31.Kxf2,Qf4+; 32.Ke1 (Kg1,Bc5+),Bh4+; 33.Kd1,Re1+ might be a winner.

The tough line is 30...exf2+; 31.Kf1,Qc1+; 32.Kxf2,Bc5+; 33.Qxc5 (Rxc5!?),Qe1+; 34.Kf3,Qe2+. Would someone mind terribly running this past one of their silicon monsters and showing how wrong I am? Thanks.> Here are the computers suggestions.

34.g3? -3.03(34.Rd1 exd1=Q 35.Bxd1 Qd2 36.g3 Qxd1+ 37.Qe2 -1.63) (editors note - they both look losing though Phony Benoni says that Bronstein thought that white may have a chance to draw here).

34...Qc1+? (if you played this move as part of your combination you didn't get it) +1.18 (34...e1=Q! 35.Kg2 Qg4! (only move) 36.Qg8 Qh3! 37.Qf3 Qh1+! (only move) 38.Ke3 Qe6+!! (only move - phony there is only one queen that can do this) 39.Qxe6 Qe1+ -3.63) 39.Rxh5? (this sac is very unsound. There are four drawing moves and one winning one) -2.47 (39.Qf4+ g5 40.Rd6+! Bxd6 41.Qxd6 Kh7 42.Qc7+ Kg6 43.Qb6+ Kf5 44.cxb4 +1.03) 39.cxb4, 39.Rd7, 39.Rd8, and 39.Rd4 all draw.

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  who: Incidentally, judging by Phony Benoni's quote it looks like Bronstein figured this all out when analyzing later without a computer.
Dec-15-06  Ashram64: i saw e2 with ease and also saw a few following up moves. however, after i saw the real game play w/ all the underpromotion and checks I realized how complicated was the game. Every move counts not materials. I just got lucky for friday
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: What a great game! Black is faced with a queen and rook under fire-and he moves a pawn!! A few moves later,he underpromotes said pawn to a knight! Such a game calls for a brand new collection of games-of the highest standard!
Dec-15-06  NBZ: Phony Benoni's post certainly explains a lot.

Lol I was feeling very clever about myself (I saw something Bronsein didn't!) but not any more.

Ah well, there is always Kramnik's Qe3 to console me...

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  karnak64: Absolute wizardry.
Dec-15-06  Maatalkko: Actually this is a very simple puzzle. All you have to do is see that there are no further checks after 33.Kh6 and then you're done. These players' later moves are superfluous and a result of zeitnot, as expalined by <Phony Benoni>.

Moves 11-27 are some real wizardry. I don't know if those moves were best but I couldn't have found them. It seems that White turned down several opportunities for perpetual check, but he did have an advantage back then, I think.

Dec-15-06  Maatalkko: Actually, if you saw the underpromotion then you goofed up, because simply making a Queen is much cleaner!
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Oh, yeah--push the pawn!
Dec-15-06  Mendrys: The under promotion was a blunder on Bronstein's part. White should have won after the underpromotion but 39. Rxh5?? loses outright. Cherepkov had counted on 40. Kg5 Qxe7+ picking up the knight and overlooked 40. Kg4.

Both players were under extreme time pressure so the mistakes are certainly understandable.

Dec-15-06  DeepThought: I got the line up to 32. ...g6 and later e1Q+

When I saw the game, first I was shocked about the queen check on 34. ...Qc1+ and the underpromotion to knight, but e1Q+ (as I had guessed) would have won outright after 34...e1Q+ 35.Kg2 Qg4 36.Qg8 Qh3 37.Kf3 Qh1 38.Ke3 Qe6+ 39.Qxe6 Qe1+

Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ValmonUni: found the move and most of the continuation.. didn't see the underpromotion coming though... very nice puzzle
Dec-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Larsker: <The underpromotion was a blunder on Bronstein's part.> Sneaky - you need a new game collection: "Silly underpromotions" :-)
Jan-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Whitehat1963: Oh my! Absurdly complex!
Jun-07-16  clement41: Fun ruy lopez open
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
8.Nxe5 instead of 8.dxe5
from Open Spanish by gjergj248
30
from Sorcerer's Apprentice Bronstein by takchess
The Sorcerer's Apprentice by David Bronstein, Game 30
from Masters, Minis and Sorcerer of the Chessboard by fredthebear
30 ... ?
from Weekend Puzzles by mgracian
Lesser-known Beauties
by Bubo bubo
Grampmaster's Favorite Combo's
by neeraj sah
Spanish Game: Open Variations (C80) 0-1 Lots o' checks
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by fredthebear
a queen/rook sac---and underpromotion!!!
from games beyond reach! by kevin86
A Queen ? or a Knight with Check ?
from 200 Open Games by David Bronstein (part 2) by tak gambit
Tough Guess-the-Move Challenges!
by Whitehat1963
puzzle 15/12/2006 black to play 30...?
from puzzles from 27/11/2006 by vuchamchi
30
from Sorcerer's Apprentice Bronstein by tak gambit
lazintata's_spanish_3
by lazintata
30...? (Friday, December 15)
from POTD Ruy Lopez by takchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC