|Apr-29-04|| ||fred lennox: A fine specimen of Bardeleben's artistry. He can be liken to Botvinnik in spirit. Primary positional and assertive, he can be bold and brilliant. His approach is analytical and exact rather than intuitive. |
|Jul-23-09|| ||Knight13: <12. Rd1 suggests itself at once as a more vigorous line of play. e4 would be good now, but for the reply b4.> It doesn't matter. Bd2 Rd1, as played in the game, gets the same result.|
|Jan-18-15|| ||poorthylacine: TO FRED LENNOX:
Your comparison seems very interesting and convincing about he styles of these two masters;
but at opposite, the difference is enormous when you include the personality: the weak point of von Bardeleben was his dramatic psychological fragility; in the Hastings tournament for instance he could not "digest" his defeat of Steinitz, the quality of his playing after their game declined much;
as long I know well, von Bardeleben later in his life became even insane at last; whereas Botvinnnik was like a man made of iron, a hard woker in openings preparation but too a player who could resist the most terrible pressure and stress in a dangerous situation, and fought always bitter on without sign of discouragement: his matches against Bronstein and Tahl are showing that; maybe the only exception was his match against Petrossian, when he began to feel really helpless facing such a kind of opponent... But his defense against Fischer in 1962 was so tough and bitter that even Fischer had to renounce to victory, unlike when he was facing Tahl one year before at Bled.
That's why personally I would compare Botvinnik rather with Tarrasch, but maybe I am wrong, of course...
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC