chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Rudolf Rezso Charousek vs K Schneider
"Amuzing" (game of the day Jun-30-2018)
Miskolc (1891), Miskolc AUH
King's Gambit: Accepted. Muzio Gambit Wild Muzio Gambit (C37)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 54 times; par: 33 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 182 more games of Charousek
sac: 5.O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-19-03  ksadler: After 15. Nd5+, was there any other option other than saccing the queen? I realize 15 .. Ke5 16. Qf5#, but what is the problem with 15. .. Kg7? I see 16. Qg5+ Kf7 17. Rf1+ and then either 17. .. Ke8 18. Qe7# or 17. .. Ke6 18. Qf5#. I guess those are the only two options so I have answered my question :)
Dec-09-03  Hidden Skillz: well ye.. see if he doesnt eat the knight(which covers e7) the king is not able to move to the queen side after the check from the rook like u pointed out f1..so from that stand point he ends up on g7 which is basically a game over..on the other hand white could do..rf7+ and then knight e7 game over again..
May-25-05  Whitehat1963: Gutsy, exciting and wild, typical of a lot of the great 19th century chess games. Oh for the good old days!
May-25-05  aw1988: <Oh for the good old days!>

Anand vs Topalov, 2005
Kasparov vs Topalov, 1999
Adams vs Kasparov, 2005
Morozevich vs Bologan, 2004
Morozevich vs E Alekseev, 2004
Karjakin vs V B Malinin, 2002
Radjabov vs Anand, 2002
Carlsen vs S Ernst, 2004
Kharlov vs Topalov, 2004

May-27-05  Whitehat1963: <aw1988>, I agree that the games you selected are examples of superb chess, but I think you would admit that the so-called "good old days" of the 19th century were more likely to feature wild sacrifices and exchanges, to say nothing of far fewer "grandmaster draws." While chess today among grandmasters is certainly more sound, and the ever increasing computer power is bringing us ever closer to the dreaded "draw death" predicted by Capablanca and Lasker, the less sound chess played in the 19th century was often more entertaining.
Aug-16-07  frank124c: White sacrifices to expose black's king. Then mates with rook and queen. Great mating technique in controlling the movement of the king so that he can easily be killed.
Apr-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: Charousek-Schneider


click for larger view

8...d6 was too early, i prefer 8...Qf6 sustaining the tug-of-war of f4 pawn.

Feb-11-12  morphyrulez: 20. Re7 wins faster, am i right?
Jun-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: <morphyrulez> probably you're not going to check back, but you are correct. Only rook and knight move that could do something do not seem to stop the queen from mating in that case.
Jun-30-18  Cheapo by the Dozen: Per the engine 13 ... Nf6 was the losing move, while 13 ... Be6 holds with a slight advantage.
Jun-30-18  MuzioFan: A great game, though some may argue I'm a bit biased.

<Cheapo> that's actually interesting to discuss. <13..Nf6> was certainly (per the engine) the losing move, but some sliding is making me believe black might already be in some mild trouble at an earlier point! Had white found <11.e5> instead of developing the knight I'm not sure if there is a stronger continuation than <11..Qg6 12.Qh4+ Ke8 13.exd6 Bg7>, where white can calmly develop with <14.Nd2 Bxd4+ 15.Kh1 Be6 16.Rae1>:


click for larger view

I would dread to have the black side in this position (even though the computer evaluation is 0.00), and the computer line is 16..Nc6 17.c3 Kd7 18.cxd4 giving up piece and bishop pair for some chance of getting the king out of the center.

Instead I'd say black's <8..d6> is the main error of the game, where instead <8..Qf6> should give far better chances (and arguably black should have played this one move earlier, because <7..Bh6> allows <8.Nc3> which can then not be answered with <8..Ne7>). The moral of this game: in the Muzio, never put your knight on f6, it never works!

Jul-01-18  djvanscoy: <MuzioFan>, in your variation, what if Black plays 13...cxd6 instead of 13...Bg7? Black can develop his bishop to f5 and his knight to f6 (sorry, this is the one time in the Muzio that it works). Here White is down two pieces for three pawns, and I don't think Black is getting mated.

As amusing as this was, the bishop sac on f7 is surely totally unsound.

Jul-01-18  MuzioFan: <djvanscoy>: What about 11..Qg6 12.Qh4+ Ke8 13.exd6 <cxd6> 14.Nc3 Bf5 15.Bxd6 Kd7 (not 15..Nf6 16.Rae1+ Kd7 17.d5! with nothing better than perpetual) 16.Be5 Nf6, which looks drawish to me. Black can hold in all lines so it seems I was a bit too optimistic, but really in the Muzio the game is black's to lose, not white's to win.

And yes, the entire opening is completely unsound.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
KGA. Muzio Gambit Wild Muzio Gambit (C37) 1-0 Stockfish notes
from yttacks & Sacs f7/f2 -1st Edition by Fredthebear by fredthebear
KGA. Muzio Gambit Wild Muzio Gambit (C37) 1-0 Stockfish notes
from Anderssen - Blackburne - Charousek - Fredthebear by fredthebear
21 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IX by wwall
Miskolc 1891
from Rudolf Rezso Charousek by wanabe2000
Successful attack in Muzio 1
from King's Gambit attacking games by Calar
Sacs to open lines to king
from Frank124c's Favorite Games--KGA by frank124c
King's gambit accept
by Magusnet
KGA. Muzio Gambit Wild Muzio Gambit
from MKD's King's Gambit by MKD
Two pieces sacrificed in the first six moves by White
from Noteworthy Games by BAJones
ISeth's favorite games
by ISeth
Charousek Comets
by chocobonbon
Pieces, I don't need no stinking pieces.
from mjk's favorite games by mjk
One of the best sacrificial attacks I've ever seen
from DanielBryant's favorite games by DanielBryant
Muzio
from SHORT AND QUICK by jungol
Clearly a nineteenth century game.
from My 100 favorite games. by Rubenus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC