chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Chigorin vs Emanuel Lasker
St. Petersburg (1895/96), St. Petersburg RUS, rd 7, Dec-29
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Giuoco Pianissimo (C53)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 75 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Chigorin/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C53"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-25-05  azaris: 35. c6? begins a bizarre desperation attack.
Aug-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Giving up the c pawn and f pawn is too much. Chigorin does get his knight to f5 but at too great a price.

Lasker would be better but perhaps not winning after 35 Qh4 Bxg5 36 Qxg5 b3 37 f6 g6 38 Ra1 Qb8 39 c6 Qc7 40 Nf1 with ideas of Nd2 restraining the b pawn. White has threats on e5 and g7 that limit Black. I don't see a clear way for Black to win this.

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Part I

A few comments from Mason and Pollock's tournament book and also from Shredder. This was the first game of the third cycle (though Steinitz vs Pillsbury, 1895 was played the same day). Lasker was coming off his second straight loss to Pillsbury, while Chigorin, after opening the tournament with a win over Steinitz, had managed just one draw against four losses. Notes from Mason are in plain text; comments from Shredder or me are in brackets. The marks after the moves are mine (or really Shredder's) except the last two exclamation points, which are Mason's.

<At move 4 Chigorin decided against trying to improve on Chigorin vs Lasker, 1895, and an original and complicated opening resulted.>

After 8....Nd7

A systematic comparison of the openings in this tourney, at least so far as they are similar, would be highly instructive to the student. Presumably representing the best as currently known, in their various directions, it appears how greatly principle may be safely modified in detail; where both parties equally enter the filed of experiment and compromise, -- each falling in somewhat with the plans of his opponent, in order the better to forward his own. This is not a model <Giuco> by any means; but, no doubt, it was well suited to the occasion, and to the feelings of the players at the time.

<Lasker's ...Nd7 is reminiscent of Chigorin's penchant for the same move in the Ruy Lopez (see, e.g. Lasker vs Chigorin, 1896 from the fourth cycle); one might almost suspect Lasker of playing on his opponent's psyche, if the world champion's scrupulously correct play did not forbid such a notion. In fact Chigorin's slow Nbd2, Bb3 and h3 invite ...Nd7-c5 hitting b3 and d3.>

After 10....d5?!

<One gets the sense Lasker really wants to win this game. 11....0-0 or ....Ne6 should lead to quiet equality.>

11. Qe2?

<A very Chigorinian move, viz. his famous 1. e4 e6 2. Qe2. But now White is a little worse. Instead Shredder likes White's pressure on the e-pawn after 11. exd5 Qxd5 12. Ne3 Qd6 13. 0-0 0-0 14. b4 Nd7 15. Re1. If 15....f6? then 16. Nf5 and -- surprise! -- Black loses his queen.>

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Part II

After 11....d4 12. c4?!

<Shredder likes 12. Ng3 0-0 13. 0-0 =, not worrying about the possible ...dxc3.>

12....f6?! 13. Bd2 Ne6?! 14. Ng3 b5

<A powerful positional idea, but Shredder liked it much better back on move 12, when White cannot retaliate by getting his bishop back on the long diagonal.>

15. cxb5! axb5 16. Bb3 Ne7?

<Black should not have been afraid to castle into a pin, because after 16....0-0 17. 0-0 Ne7 or ...Kh8 White is just slightly better. But the text allows 17. Nh5!, when 17....0-0 is met by 18. Nxe5 fxe5 19. Qg4, threatening mate and the knight on e6. >

17. Nh4?

The position is a strange one, and the wanderings of the Knights on both sides, very curious. Inasumch as Black must first commit himself on the King side by Castling or otherwise, if there is any advantage that way it probably lies with White.

17....Nc5 18. Bc2 Be6 <Now Black is the master of the long diagonal.> 19. Nh5 0-0 20. g4?


click for larger view

On the other hand, <White's> Queen side is weak. P - QKt4, driving off the knight, before venturing on this, would not increase that weakness, and seems commendable here. The exchange of Bishop for Knight a little later is comparatively unfavorable.

<Now White begins to get himself into serious trouble.>

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Part III

20....Bb6! 21. b4 <White has no really good answer to the threats to a2 and b3.> 21....Nb3! 22. Bxb3 Bxb3 23. 0-0 Bf7

Taking the pawn would be hazardous. There would be B-R6 with strong attack; in the course of which the Pawn or more would be very soon returned. Presently, when the threatening Knights are disposed of, the capture is in order, after which White slowly but surely goes to the wall.

<Surprisingly to me, 23. 0-0 and 23....Bf7 are both Shredder's first choice.>

24. Nf5?

<Attractive and again, very Chigorinian. But Shredder strongly prefers 24. f4.>

24....Nxf5

<And Lasker responds with a suitably Laskerian, pragmatic, cut-the-Gordian-knot kind of move, part of a forcing maneuver in which Black exchanges one of his opponent's knights and drives off the other, while simultaneously winning the pawn on a2. But the White pawn left at f5 gives White durable attacking chances, with with f5-f6 a constant threat after f2-f4 and fxe5. Simpler for Black is 24....Bxh5 25. Nxe7+ Qxe7 26. gxh5 Qe6, forking a2 and h3 and answering 27. Qg4 with ...Qxg4+ and ...Ra3, when at least one of White's weak pawns will fall.>

25. gxf5 Qe8 26. Ng3 Rxa2 27. Rxa2 Bxa2 28. Kh2!

<Now 28. Bh6 Bf7? 29. Qg4 is strong for White, but 28....Qf7 is fine for Black.>

28....Bf7 29. Rg1 Kh8 30. Qg4 <30. f4 at once is better> 30....Rg8 31. f4 c5?

<Looks good, but the simple ...exf4 and then ...c5 leaves White without the attacking resources he has in the game.>

32. fxe5 fxe5 33. Bg5! Bd8

Fearing P-B6 which would, indeed, be very dangerous.

<Just how dangerous is shown by 33....c4 34. f6 Bd8 35. Qh4! g6 36. Bh6 cxd3 37. Qg5 Bb3 38. Rg2 Qd7 39. Bg7+ Rxg7 40. fxg7+ Kg8 41. Qxe5 with a very complicated position, though Black is still better.>

34. bxc5 b4


click for larger view

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Part IV

35. c6?

Keeping up the attack for what it is worth. But the defence is adequate, and Black's diversion, by means of his passed Pawn, secures him the victory.

<As Tamar pointed out four years ago, pitching the QBP is more courageous than sound. It seems almost as if Chigorin disliked regaining his lost pawn, and felt obligated to gambit it back. Also as Tamar pointed out, 35. Qh4 is much more promising. After his 35....Bxg5 36. Qxg5 b3 f6 37. Ra1 Qb8 39. c6 Qc7 40. Nf1 line, no clear win for Black is apparent to me or to Shredder. A possible Black improvement is 36....Qd8 37. Qxd8 Rxd8 38. Rb1 b3 39. Ne2 Rc8 40. Nc1 Rxc5 41. Nxb3 Rb5 42. Nd2 Rxb1 43. Nxb1 Bh5 threatening ...Be2. But I suspect there are plenty of better moves for White in that line, e.g. 38. Ra1 Rc8 39. Ra7 Kg8 40. f6 or 40. Rb7.>

35....Qxc6 36. Bxd8 Qxd8 37. Qg5

If 37 Kt-R5, then 37....Q-KR3, or 37.....R-KKt sq; and there would be no possibility of Kt (or Q) x P, without speedy loss.

37....Qf6 38. Qc1 Qe7 39. f6 gxf6 (Shredder prefers 39....Qxf6, but the text is good enough) 40. Nf5 Qf8 41. Qc7 Rc8 42. Qb6 Bg6 43. Nh4 Be8 44. Nf5 Bd7 45. Nh4

Here the attack comes to an abrupt conclusion. 45 Kt-Q6 would be slightly better. Black could not reply 45....R-B3, because of 46 Q-Q8! But he could check, and play B-K3, with an ultimately winning advantage.

45....Qh6! 46. Qd6 Qxh4 47. Qxd7 Qf4+! Resigns.

<It's a forced mate: 48. Kh1 Qf3+ 49. Rg2 Rc1+ 50. Kh2 Qf4+ 51. Rg3 Rc2+ 52. Kh1 Qf1+! 53. Rg1 Qf3+ 54. Rg2 Qxg2#.>

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Third Cycle, Game 1 (December 29, 1895)
from St. Petersburg 1895-96 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Third Cycle, Game 1 (December 29, 1895)
from St. Petersburg 1895-96 by keypusher
1-ig-eco53
by classicalwin2
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129
L2
from How to Defend in Chess by Colin Crouch game coll by tak gambit


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC