chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Chigorin vs Harry Nelson Pillsbury
St. Petersburg (1895/96), St. Petersburg RUS, rd 2, Dec-15
Four Knights Game: Spanish. Symmetrical Variation (C49)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Chigorin/Pillsbury games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-23-07  MostlyAverageJoe: <outplayer: I wonder if white can save himself if he plays another move than the goofing 26.gxh4. Any engines?>

As already posted before, HIARCS 11.1 says that 26.Nc6 seems best for the white (+0.3). 26.Qxe5 proposed by <realbrob> gives slight edge to the black evaluating at (-0.39).

Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: First I tried the non-sac move:26... Bf3+ and then the sac move 26... ♕xd4 before 27... ♗f3+. The first move forces the win of the queen after ♘xf3 by ♕xf4. The second eliminates the knight and prevents ♘xf3-but can suffer complications after ♗f3+ ♖g2. I think a win may be there but it won't be MOnDAY easy.

Therefore,I prefer the text move-an immediate 26...♗f3+

Apr-23-07  Crowaholic: Easy one, threating ♖g1# was obvious and then it was easy to see that ♘xf3 stops the mate but drops the queen. However, I didn't even consider 27. ♖g2. This leads to a mate with a nice decoy queen sacrifice: 27. ..♖xg2 28. ♘xf3 ♕xf4 29. ♗f1 ♕xh2+ 30. ♘xh2 ♖g1#.
Apr-23-07  Alex S.: I chose:

26...Qxf4
27.Rxf4 Bf3+
28.(any) Rg1#

I think it's better. Sure mate is better than the choice mate or queen.

Apr-23-07  Dr.Lecter: After a long spring break, I got a bit rusty. Why, it took me almost 5 seconds to see this! :) <kidding, it took me more>
Apr-23-07  JG27Pyth: <Alex S.: I chose:

26...Qxf4
27.Rxf4 Bf3+
28.(any) Rg1#

I think it's better. Sure mate is better than the choice mate or queen.>

I think the <28.(any)> gets replaced with 28. ♘xf3, and the ♖g1# mate is gone.

Apr-23-07  jmelton: < Alex S.: I chose:

26...Qxf4
27.Rxf4 Bf3+
28.(any) Rg1#

I think it's better. Sure mate is better than the choice mate or queen.>

That would be nice, but the catch is that if 28.Nxf3 then there is no mate.

Apr-23-07  schnarre: A good refresher puzzle!
Apr-23-07  sambo: <YouRang: This one was a little more cerebral than most Monday puzzles. Of course, I immediately saw 26...Bf3+, and I was about to satisfy myself that white had to take my bishop, after which I have 27...Rg1#.

But then I noticed that this plan falls apart if white takes my bishop with the knight, guarding g1. For a couple seconds, I considered that winning the knight with 26...Qxd4 would be the solution (if 27. cxd4, then 27...Bf3+ and 28...Rg1# is unstoppable).

Fortunately, I took another moment to notice that after 26...Bf3+ 27. Nxf3, the knight neatly interferes with the white queen's only defender (the rook at f2) leaving the queen hung. A very interesting Monday puzzle!>

Almost word for word how I went through this puzzle. I thought it was a little more thought-provoking than the stereotypical sacrifice-a-queen-for-a-mate-in-one puzzle that they usually toss out for a Monday.

Apr-23-07  melv: A little tricky for monday. Yes, very nice I like this puzzles.
Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <dramas79: 26...QxN would be messy because a subsequent 27...Bf3+ could be answered by 28. Rg2 complicating the win>

Well, assuming that 26...QxN was answered by 27. cxd4, then 27...Bf3+ still forces a quick mate, even if white plays 28. Rg2, because after 28...Rxg2!, white has no answer:

If 29. Qxf3 (or Rxf3) then 29...Rg1#
If 29. Re1 then Rg1# (double check!)
If 29. h3 then 29...Rg1 30. Kh2 R8g2#
If 29. Qg3 then 29...R2xg3+ 30. Rxf3 Rg1#

But 26...QxN is a bad choice because it wins a knight when he could have won a queen.

Apr-23-07  agentniner: Pillsbury made a lot of mistakes in this game. Seems like he did nothing to try and correct them.
Apr-23-07  jheiner: Good morning! Well, I almost missed it, because I was looking so hard for the obligatory Monday queen sac before realizing it was unnecessary.

The move I didn't understand was 26.g3xh4. The line I looked at was for White to simply trade up and go into the endgame.

26. Qf4xe5 fxe5 27. Nd4-f5 Bg4xf5 (var: Rg5 with Black gaining tempo) 28. Rf2xf5 hxg3 29. hxg3 Rg7xg3 30. Re3xg3 Rg8xg3 31. Rf5xf7 with a rook on the 7th rank and bishop over knight.

I'm sure there's some not so subtle threat that i've missed, but thought i'd kibitz anyway. Hope this helps some of the more experienced get a sense of where the less experienced are coming from.

Apr-23-07  MostlyAverageJoe: <outplayer: I wonder if white can save himself if he plays another move than the goofing 26.gxh4>

Update: after 19-ply analysis, HIARCS 11.1 evaluates the following two moves as best for white:

26.Nc6 (+0.17)
26.Be2 (+0.01)

Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: It is said that everything is there on board only one must have the insight to see. The game is simple yet elegant.
Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  outplayer: Thanks MostlyAverageJoe.
Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: How about Bh5? It gets the Bishop out of the way so the Rook can come down for checkmate, while at the same time guarding f3 so that if the White Knight goes there, Bxf3+, winning White's Queen anyhow.
Apr-23-07  Crowaholic: <playground player: How about Bh5?>

Correct me if I'm wrong, but 26. ..♗h5 27. ♖e1 and Black has nothing (and is a pawn down).

Apr-23-07  ruzon: Why is 26. Nc6 Qxc4 better than 26. Nf5?
Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  NakoSonorense: Are Monday puzzles getting harder or am I getting worse?
Apr-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <Crowaholic: <playground player: How about Bh5?> Correct me if I'm wrong, but 26. ..h5 27. e1 and Black has nothing (and is a pawn down).>

You are correct. Bf3+ gives white no time to defend the back rank; Bh5 does.

<ruzon: Why is 26. Nc6 Qxc4 better than 26. Nf5?>

There doesn't appear to be a big difference, except again, Nc6 is more forcing. After 26. Nf5, black has more choices. For example, 26...hxg3 trades a crummy isolated rook pawn for a nice paired pawn. It also prevents white from playing gxh4, which would have hindered the mobility of black's knight (preventing ...Ng5).

Jan-16-09  blacksburg: 8...Ne7 is strange. a common idea here is 8...Qe7, followed by ...Nd8, ...Ne6, etc, ala Rubinstein.
Sep-19-10  morphy2010: 26.gxh4 is a blunder any comments?
Sep-20-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <morphy2010: 26.gxh4 is a blunder any comments?>

You're a spammer.

Dec-26-14  Poisonpawns: Chigorin was a fantastic player, but boy did he make some strange blunders 26.gxh4?? geez!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Andreiko's favorite games
by Andreiko
A creative way to remove the defender
from Tactics for beginners by olaf4lena
parmetd's favorite games
by parmetd
Spanish, 4 Knights Symmetrical (C49) 0-1 Keep file closed!
from Memo '17 to C Quad by fredthebear
power of the open file
from chess strategems viii - under construction by gauer
Spanish, 4 Knights Symmetrical (C49) 0-1 Keep file closed!
from PM Joins the Under 30 Crowd@Fredthebear's Place by fredthebear
26...Bf3+
from Destruction sacrifices by outplayer
Spanish, 4 Knights Symmetrical (C49) 0-1 Keep file closed!
from g-pawn/file demolitions after Fredthebear's 1.e4 by fredthebear
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
Pillsbury
from Wild Games! by Tridel
Where to attack
from Italian by waddayaplay
26...? (Monday, April 23)
from Puzzle of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
Pillsbury vs World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
lazintata's_open_3
by lazintata
St.Petersburg 1895
from Pillsbury: Chess Biography by jessicafischerqueen
HNP: "A Genuis Ahead of His Time"
by chocobonbon
First Cycle, Game 3 (December 15, 1895)
from St. Petersburg 1895-96 by JoseTigranTalFischer
First Cycle, Game 3 (December 15, 1895)
from St. Petersburg 1895-96 by keypusher
Pillsbury defends Spanish. Symmetrical (C49) 0-1
from Italiano Job c3s Mobbed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Pillsbury miniatures.
by CoryLetain
plus 17 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC