chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Chigorin vs Wilhelm Steinitz
London (1899), London ENG, rd 16, Jun-20
Ponziani Opening: General (C44)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 58 more Chigorin/Steinitz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-25-04  drukenknight: another well played Ponziani. IN his game vs Bird, Chigorin played 10 Re1+, interesting how he must have studied that move. I guess this is main line, blacks messed up q side pawns, he has to live with. At the end, I thought steinitz needed to push the pawn to g4 rather quickly.
Oct-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Chigorin kept this game complex, and then was able to show off his skills at calculation.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: This game is the last time these two immortals of the chessboard crossed swords. Sadly, it is not one of their better contests.

Steinitz once again burdened himself with a bad opening, this time a poor variation as Black against Tchigorin's Ponziani Opening. Given that Bird played the identical line against Tchigorin nine rounds later, this variation may represent contemporary wisdom as to how to combat this opening, though it is hard to see why anyone would think this line was best play for Black.

The Tournament Book's comments notwithstanding, Tchigorin's 10. Rd1 here is far inferior to the simple 10. Bxd3 Tchigorin played against Bird in the later game. It certainly seems as if Tchigorin had studied this opening between this game and the time of his game against Bird, and that Bird faced more enterprising play. As the opening went here, after Tchigorin's questionable 13. Bf4 (instead of the indicated 13. Nd2) Steinitz could have achieved near equality with 13...Bd7.

But Steinitz had unjustified ideas of an attack on the b-file and played 13...Rb8, allowing Tchigorin to work up all sorts of threats. Having made this questionable move, Steinitz should at least have followed through on his idea and after Tchigorin's 15. Nd2 have played 15...Rxb2. The Tournament Book states that this move by Steinitz would have lost the exchange after 16. Nb3, but after 16...Nd5 17. Qa3 Steinitz would have had a draw with 17...Rxf2!! 18. KxR Qe3+ 19. Kf1 Bxh3!! 20. gxB Qxh3+ with a perpetual check [if 21. Ke1 Qe3+ and now 22. Be2 leads to mate in 2 for Black].

The move Steinitz actually made, 15...Nd5 should have landed him in trouble after 16. Nc4, but Tchigorin let Steinitz off the hook with 16. Qh4. Steinitz was now fine until his careless 17...Nf6, which overlooked Tchigorin's Knight fork with 18. Nd4. This was clearly not the Steinitz of old.

Once Steinitz lost a pawn, he apparently decided to try a coffee-house attack against his fabled opponent. Not surprisingly, these wild tactics did not work against a master of combinations like Tchigorin.

By move 25, Steinitz was down a Knight, and could safely have resigned. As a final indignity, however, he walked into Tchigorin's neat 29. Qxe4. Since Steinitz couldn't take Tchigorin's Queen because this would have allowed 30. Rd8+, the game came to a sudden and horrible end for Steinitz.

As I have said before on this site, watching Steinitz in this his last tournament is sad. He was old, sick, financially ruined,and no longer able to play at anything approaching the level of his glory years (though he did manage to end the Tournament with a surprising win over Janowski).

We should remember the great Steinitz based on his championship play over three decades and not for this last tournament, the only one in which he failed to win even a minor prize.

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <KEG> Why do you droll on with such nonsense about "immortals"? Or are you in actuality just trying to attract attention to yourself?

Good lord, the violins are weeping themselves

*****

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <KEG>, that was probably the best posting in the history of chessgames.com, and some of us here, particularly me, would like to buy you a drink and shake your hand.

And <KEG> I just want you to know that when the going got tough, you got us all going.

Loneliness, that's the bottom line.

Steinitz was never happy as a child.

Christmas <KEG>, what does that mean to you? It was living hell for Steinitz. Do you know what it's like falling in the mud and getting kicked in the head with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. That never happens. Sorry <KEG>, that's a dumb question.

Municipal bonds <KEG>, I'm talking double A rating the best investment in America. Steinitz missed out!

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: <morfishine> Steinitz and Tchigorin are "immortal" because the memory of them will last as long as there are those who love chess and chess history.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: <offramp> So glad you enjoyed my post on this game.

In response to your question, I have never experienced the despair you suggest Steinitz lived through. On the other hand, I have never experienced the joy it must be to be able to play at the level Steinitz achieved or to have the profound insights he had concerning chess.

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <KEG> I stand corrected <offramp> put it best

*****


A free online guide presented by Chessgames.com
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game 54
from Wilhelm Steinitz Biography Compiled by Qindarka by fredthebear
the rivals 1
by ughaibu
Game 54
from World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Santasiere's "My Love Affair With Tchigorin"
by Resignation Trap
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
chigorin 10
from great attack games by emilio martinez


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC