chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Mikhail Chigorin
Rice Gambit thematic m (1903), Brighton ENG, rd 1, Aug-03
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Rice Gambit (C39)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 22 times; par: 48 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Lasker/Chigorin games
sac: 8.O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Suprising that this is the first kibitz on this game. <iron maiden> and <Backward Development> have included it in their collections, however. Rightly so too. This is a great battle and Lasker's only win from the Brighton 1903 "Rice Gambit" Match.
Nov-05-05  PizzatheHut: <Benzol> Would you mind explaining how this match got its interesting moniker?
Nov-05-05  iron maiden: <PizzatheHut> According to <Benzol> this match was a series of games in which Lasker (playing White) was forced to open with this line of the King's Gambit each time. Apparently it was arranged to test whether the "Rice Gambit" was sound or unsound.
Nov-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <PizzatheHut> <iron maiden> is correct. Issac Rice, millionaire and chess patron was fond of this variation of the Kieseritzky Gambit and organised and financed theme tournaments where this opening, named after him, had to be played. He financed a match in Brighton England in 1903 to test out the variation with Lasker having White in all six games (it might have been better if Chigorin had had White given his attacking prowess). It took place from August 3rd to August 15th with Chigorin winning (+2, =3, -1). The gambit is considered dubious.
Nov-05-05  percyblakeney: The theme tournament in Ostend 1906 ended with 6 wins for white and 41 for black, so the Rice Gambit wasn't entirely successful... A couple of links:

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconVal...

http://home.wi.rr.com/etzel/ricegam...

Nov-25-05  Cogano: As with Hartlaub's game (vs. Testa), I need someone's help here. Again, I'm using my 100 Chess Gems by P. Wenman (Cadogan Books) as my guide. Except in it, it lists 16. Bd3 ("d6 is also a strong move.)...Qxd5; 17. Qc2 f5 ("Qh5 is the alternative."); 18. Nd2 b5 ("Black is drifting into a bad position.") 19. Re1 Qf7 (If Nd7, Nf1 and e3 [meaning Ne3, I think] will follow."); 20. Re5 Be6; 21. Ne4 ("Fine play. IF fxe4, Rg5+; Kh8, Be5+.")... Bc4; 22. Bxc4 Qxc4; 23. Nd6 Qf1 ("Now the play becomes very critical. Black threatens f2 and Qg1 mate."); 24. R27 ("Also with the mating threat of 25. Qb3+ Kh8; 26. Be5+.")...Nd7; ("If c5 (for c4); 25. Be5, Nc6; Nxf5 Rxf5; 27. Rg7+ Kh8; Rxp+ (presumably Rxg4) and White will at least draw.") 25. Rxd7 Rf6; ("Another clever move which saves the situation, for if White stops for 26. Be5, then Raf8; 27. Bxf6 Qh3+; 28. Kg1 Qxg3+; 29. Kf1 Qh3+; 30. Ke1 Qh1+; 31. Kd2 Qg2+; 32. Kc1 Qxc2+; 33. Kxc2 Rxf6; 34. Rd8+ Kg7; 35. Ne8+ Kg6; 36. Nxf6. (on a separate line below all that) f2 wins.") 26. Qb3+ Kh8; 27. Nf7+ Kg7; 28. Ne5+ Kh8; 29. Nf7+ Kg7; 30. Nd8+ Kh8; 31. Nf7+ ("White can only draw, for if he withdraws Qc2 Black wins by f2. An exciting game.") Well here's my question: Why play 28. Ne5+ at all? IMO 28. Ng5+ is the winning move: If 28. ...Kh6/h8; 29. Rxh7 mate; if 28. ...Rf7; 29. Qxf7+ Kh6/h8; 30. Qxh7 mate; & if 28. ...Kf8; 29. Nxh7+ Ke8; 30. Nxf6+ Kf8; 31. Qf7/g8 mate! I hope someone will post their opinion on this. Thank you.
Nov-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <Cogano> The notes you're quoting belong to this game Lasker vs Chigorin, 1903 from the same match.
Apr-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: To try to save Black's game, I suggest 21...Qe4.

If White trades queens, the attack becomes less sharp, as in 21...Qe4 22. Qxe4 Rxe4 23. Nxg4 Re2+ 24. Kh3 f2 25. Rf1 Rxb2, etc.

But if White avoids the queen trade, Black gains time to counterattack, for example 21...Qe4 22. Qc4 Qxf4!? 23. gxf4 Rxe3 with White's king in a net.

Apr-09-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: While looking through all the games these titans played, I was surprised to note that Chigorin never essayed the King's Gambit in any of the games in which he played White, given his predilection for and virtuosity with the opening, with both colours. His games from the Vienna (Wien) 1903 event are well worth a look.
Nov-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Match game 1 of the Rice Gambit match, won by Chigorin +2=3-1.

This game was played in Brighton, England on August 3, 1903.

The opening repeated up to 15.Bf4.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
new collection
by nadvil
Lasker and Chigorin duke it out.
from EVERYONE loves the King's Gambit by Backward Development
Game 34 in Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
ja 62, par 42
from Game collection: KGA by kafkafan
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
34
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Incremental
Game 34 in Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from yUndrwear Serves A Purpose Butt Not 4Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 34 in Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis
from yKnights Add Spice I Gives Fredthebear Heartburn by fredthebear
Game 34
from Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
randejong's favorite games
by randejong
45 of 42 How did white let this one slip away?
from larryjapan's favorite games 1 by larryjapan
Game 18
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
kg rice gambit
from mughug's favorite games by mughug
34
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
KGA. Kieseritsky Gambit. Rice Gambit.
from MKD's King's Gambit by MKD
34
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC