Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Chigorin vs Albert Whiting Fox
Cambridge Springs (1904), Cambridge Springs, PA USA, rd 14, May-17
French Defense: McCutcheon Variation (C12)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 824 more games of Chigorin
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-12-06  VanPoolPlayer: on 12 O-O-O... why not O-O instead? You think that Chigorin would have seen bxc3 as an obvious move to disrupt the pawn structure. I also prefer O-O so the king can help defend the 4 vs 3 pawn majority on the king's side. Or is that the very reason he went O-O-O?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: After <11...a6>:

click for larger view

I think Chigorin probably chose 12.0-0-0 as part of his general approach to the position. If White wishes to avoid the doubled c-pawn, he is stuck with 12.Nde2 or 12.Kd2, neither of which would have appealed to Chigorin's temperament.

Castling queenside is attempt to compensate for the pawn weaknesses with a rapid mobilization. Note how Black's queenside development is impeded. Also, if Black plays ...e5, White can answer with Rhe1 and have both rooks in play.

Reinfeld, in his tournament book, felt Chigorin played very well up till <29.Rd7?>, recommending instead the blockade with 29.Re3. After Black played <29...e3>, White's rooks could never coordinate, the one on the third rank being particularly useless.

In the final position, White lost on time. Our score is incorrect as of today; Black's final move was actually 41...Ra4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: 34.Rf1 is nonsensical. Maybe it was 34.Rf3, which would be consistent with the rest of the score.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
June, p. 19 [Game 113]
from American Chess Bulletin 1904 by Phony Benoni
Cambridge Springs 1904
by suenteus po 147
Cambridge Springs 1904
by JoseTigranTalFischer

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC