Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Max Euwe
Capablanca - Euwe (1931), Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam and Scheveningen NED, rd 9, Jul-28
Slav Defense: Czech. Carlsbad Variation (D17)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 40 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 17 more Capablanca/Euwe games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-02-04  Lawrence: Euwe's game went downhill after 22.....g6. Bxa1 or Bxe4 would have been much better. (Junior 8)
Apr-08-05  rumcutter: Why doesn't Capablanca play Qxb4?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <rumcutter> I presume your talking about White's 19th move where he Capablanca plays 19.♗xe5.

If he'd played 19.♕xb4 Black can reply 19...♖d1+ 20.♗f1 is forced because White plays 20.♖xd1 Black captures White's Queen.

Black then plays 20...♕xb4 21.♖xb4 regains the Queen but Black then wins the exchange with 21...♖xa1.

Hope this helps.

Apr-08-05  psmith: Lawrence: "Euwe's game went downhill after 22.....g6. Bxa1 or Bxe4 would have been much better. (Junior 8)"

What does Junior have in mind in these variations? They seem to me to give White good play. Here's my attempt to analyze (as usual I'm probably missing something).

22... Ba1 23. Bf5 (threats of 24. Be6 and Qh7; Bh7 and Bg8; and also Ra1.) 23... e4 24. Qb3 Rd5 25. Be6 Kh8 26. Bd5 Qd5 27. Qd5 cd5 28. Ra1 with a piece up; 23 ... g6 24. Bg6 or 23. ... Rf5 24. Qf5 should win. What's the defense I'm missing?

And on 22... Be4 23. Qe4 g6 24. Nh7 Kh7 25. Rb7 Kh6 (25... Kh8 26. Qg6) Qh4#; 24...Rd6 25. Nf8 Ba1 26. Ng6.; 24... Ba1 25 Qg6 Kh8 26. Nf6 looks to be winning...

So, again, what am I missing?

(can anyone tell me how to make my replies register as replies?)

Apr-08-05  Shams: <Lawrence> simply enclose the name of the person you are replying to, or the pertinent text (such as <can anyone tell me how to make my replies register as replies>) in left and right angle brackets. it's a cinch.
Apr-09-05  Lawrence: <psmith>, <Bxa1 or Bxe4 would have been much better> doesn't mean that Black is ahead. As you say, White has good play, but Black isn't taking a shellacking. In your first line Junior would not play 24.....Rd5 but 24.....Kh8. Then, after 25.Nf7+ Rxf7 26.Qxf7 White is up almost a pawn, but Black hasn't lost....yet.

In your second line, Black would play not 24....Kxh7 but 24.....Rf5. Now Junior shows virtual equality, -0.21

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Capablanca pointed out a defense two moves before:
"20...Bc3 Not the best. Black's defense is extremely difficult. It is touch and go, yet 20...Bf7 would probably save the game. After the text move White wins by force." - JRC
Jan-27-08  notyetagm: (VAR) Position after 26 ♖b7x♖d7+ ♗f5x♖d7 27 ♕a2-a3!

click for larger view

Golombek points out this instant win that Capablanca missed, this <QUEEN FORK> of the <UNDEFENDED> Black c3-bishop and e7-<FORKING SQUARE>.

White (Capablanca) is simultaneously threatening both 28 ♕a3x♗c3 as well as 28 ♕a3-e7+, 29 ♕e7x♗d7.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Ok, but I like 27.Rb8!! in that line:

click for larger view

Jan-27-08  notyetagm: <Calli: Ok, but I like 27.Rb8!! in that line:>

Well, I was thinking along the lines that the f7- and h7-squares next to the Black g7-king might make better targets than the <UNDEFENDED> Black d7-bishop.

Jan-27-08  notyetagm: <Calli: Ok, but I like 27.Rb8!! in that line:>

click for larger view

A very nice <REMOVAL OF THE GUARD> tactic. If Black takes the White b8-rook with 27 ... ♖f8x♖b8??, then the Black f8-rook no longer <DEFENDS> the critical f7-square and its mate in 3.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Black can try 27...Bc8 but then he runs into 28.Bd3! and its over because if Qa5 then Rxc8. Anyway, yes, Capa missed the quick one, but Harry G. missed, IHMO, the more "chessy" variation.
Dec-04-08  paladin at large: In a 1981 interview Euwe commented that Capablanca had a "little luck" to win here, as Capa had a "bad opening". (My quotes.) However, it seems to me that white is looking fine after move 13.

This win clinched the match victory for Capa.

Jun-26-09  AnalyzeThis: I think what Euwe meant regarding the luck was that Capa didn't see everything in the complications, but his marvelous intution was proven correct. Regarding the opening, Euwe may mean that he had full equality.
Jun-26-09  WhiteRook48: make that mate in 2 if black is careless
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Discussion of this game can be found at:

Feb-06-12  RookFile: Just win, baby, as Al Davis would say.
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: A photo from the beginning of the 1931 match:
Feb-21-19  sakredkow: I really like the pawn sac with 16. b4. And then after 18...O-O the deflection 19...Rd1+! keeps white from 19. Qxb4.
Feb-21-19  sudoplatov: Another step on Euwe's road to the World Championship. He did come through in the clutch though.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Euwe's career took a curious path, in that his reputation before his victory over Alekhine was founded largely on narrow defeats in matches against top players of his day, rather than tournament or match wins.
Feb-21-19  sudoplatov: According to the Euwe page here, he won 102 tournaments. That's not bad even if these weren't all super strong.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
In good comapny
from Grega's favorite games by Grega
by Sven W
Match Capablanca!
by amadeus
Capablanca-Euwe 1931
by CherrylandCafe
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
Capablanca vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
27 Qa2-a3! forks undefended Black b3-bishop,e7-forking square
from QUEEN FORKS by notyetagm
92. "One of those strange 'double errors'"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by Incremental
Game 461
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
Game 66
from World Champion - Capablanca (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
27 Qa2-a3! undefended d7-bishop + g7-king = e7-forking square
from capablanca best games by brager
Game 461
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
Euwe vs. the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by KingG
Game 41
from World Champion - Euwe (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Match Euwe (International)!
by amadeus
Game 79
from Veliki majstori saha 12 CAPABLANCA (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
92. "One of those strange 'double errors'"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by demirchess

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC