chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Max Euwe
Zurich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 10, Sep-15
Formation: King's Indian Attack (A07)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Petrosian/Euwe game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-17-04  PizzatheHut: <chessgames.com> Isn't this a KIA instead of an "English Opening, Caro-Kann defensive system"? I don't know too much theory, so I could very well be wrong.
Jun-17-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: You're probably right. The routine which identifies ECO codes has some flaws, especially when dealing with systems like the KIA.
Jun-15-05  suenteus po 147: I take it 62.Kh4 is the clincher because now Petrosian can successfully queen a pawn?
Jun-16-05  weirdoid: <suenteus po 147> I cannot help wondering myself, under what circumstances Euwe resigned. If his position was so hopeless after the natural-looking 62. Kh4, why didn't he resign one move earlier? It is not a difficult move to see, and anyway, how could he decide that he is hopeless OTB?

I suspect that this game might have been adjourned and Euwe made teh decision to resign during adjournment. To my understanding, in the old days (and not that old - it was still like that in late 80's / eraly 90's when I was starting to learn chess), a game could be adjourned after the first time control (move 40 has passed), and the player who gets the turn to move tells the referee (umpire? What is the correct term anyway?) what move he will play next. The players could then go to bed or, more commonly, spend the night analyzing.

I guess 62. Kh4 was Petrosian's "secret move" (thus, never actually played) and Euwe decided that he was completely lost only during analysis. I wonder if there are any chess historians here who would tell us if this guess is correct.

Of course, the appearance of cheap, powerful PC's in the 90's made adjournments obsolete. What a pity.

Jun-16-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <suenteus, weirdoid> You are both correct, white needs the king for help to get a pawn promoted, and with the extra pawn (even though the bishops are on different color) black is hopeless.

And yes, from reading the book 'Bobby Fischer Goes to War' and other articles, adjournment was allowed, you must write down your move, seal it, give it to the judge. Then you may consult with your second all you wish. Spassky did this in the last game versus B. Fischer in Iceland, ironically, according to the book, Spassky did not even show up for the remainder of the game, he simply resigned.

May-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  arsen387: A very interesting game by two great champions. And also it's very instructive how Petrosian converts his small advantage to a win. Move 49.h5 blocking black pawn on a dark square is great. Then, to win this position, only remains to exchange the Qs, which Petrosian accomplishes in style. After that the Kside connected pawns can't be stopped. Interesting alternative for blacks could be 47..Qxg4? Is there any way for blacks to hold a draw?
Jul-21-09  superstoned: Here's a good quote, by Bronstein, regarding White's play around moves 16 through 20. It probably also applies to Black's maneuver starting with a7-a5 but illogically followed up with...Ra8-d8.

Bronstein: "Why take over an open file, if one is not going to use it to penetrate the enemy position?"

Aug-07-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The two games in this tournament (the other was drawn) were the only two times these two players ever faced each other. The "classical" development of the Black bishops on f5 and c5 seems to play into White's hands as he gains time chasing them. 8..Bh7 or 9..Bxe4 one move later both look like better than what Euwe played. 9..Be7 could have been answered with 10 Nh4! and the weakness at b7 is apparent. If 10..Bg4 11 Ne5 and Black is much worse. Petrosian said after the game that either 16 c5 or 16 Ne5 would have been better. After 24..Qxd8 Euwe offered a draw but Petrosian refused. 28..Bxe5? was a positional blunder; 28..g5 was an alternative suggested by Winter. 36 Bxd5..cxb 37 Qc3 would have been stronger leading to the immediate win of a pawn. 36..Qg8 may have been a stronger defense. Euwe gave up a pawn hoping that the opposite-colored bishops would give him drawing chances but he could never overcome the weakness of his inactive bishop. The winning maneuver 54 Qf8! had presumably been worked out in Petrosian's adjournment analysis. Euwe started the tournament 5.5-3.5 but starting with this loss in round 10 seemed to run out of gas only winning one more game in the last 20 rounds.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
P4AD
from Ivankov69's favorite games by Ivankov69
Game 69
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by MSteen
Game 69
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by isfsam
Round Ten, Game 69
from WCC Zurich 1953 by Pawn N Hand
Game 87
from Think Like a Grandmaster (Kotov) by isfsam
Across the generations
by Minor Piece Activity
Game 21
from Python Strategy (Petrosian) by Qindarka
D.P Singh beats Morphy
by arifattar
G14
from P.H.Clarke: Petrosian's Best games by setuhanu01
Petrosian Games Only
by fredthebear
Game 11
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by Chessdreamer
+0 -1 =1 vs. Petrosian (Zurich Candidates 1953)
from Match Euwe (International)! by amadeus
Round Ten, Game 69
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 69
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by uril
Round Ten, Game 69
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by TigerTiger
Max Euwe vs. Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian 0 - 1 (plus 1 draw)
from Euwe vs. the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
KIA-solid opening-BBQ endgame-conversion of advantage
from Rep KID/KIA & a li'l KGA Compiled by fispok by fredthebear
Rēti Opening 1-0
by gr1nch
Petrosian vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Game 11
from Veliki majstori saha 27 PETROSJAN (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
plus 12 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC