chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Ernst Falkbeer vs Johann Jacob Loewenthal
Birmingham (1858), London ENG, Sep-17
Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid. Spielmann Attack (C26)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Falkbeer/Loewenthal games
sac: 25.Rxf6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-05  InspiredByMorphy: Incredible game! Falkbeer's play is genius, sacking a bishop (24.Bxh6!)immediately followed by a rook (25.Rxf6!) to leave blacks king in a hopelessy exposed position. I think Morphy would have enjoyed watching this game.
Jan-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: 33 e5!! is necessary to keep the combination going, but it occurs 9 moves later.
Oct-08-07  Antiochus: Unbelievable!!
Feb-17-16  zanzibar: Are the colors wrong for this game?

FWIW- <CG> agrees with <Chessbase>.

But I believe the original source is from Staunton, 1859, where the game is given as

<Falkbeer--Loewenthal>

<019/032 <Falkbeer -- Loewenthal (39) 1-0 > Queen's Knight Opening - Played 9/17 (Fri) at St. George's Club>

from <Chess Player's Chronicle v1 S3 (1859) p19/32>

Feb-18-16  Retireborn: <z> Does NOT agree with Chessbase Big 2002, which has this as the second game of the match, played on 17 September with Loewenthal winning as White.
Feb-13-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I intend to go into this in greater detail, but, for now, the nub of the problem is that <CPC 1859> gives Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.17) followed by this game (p.19) with the note (p.20):

<These two games form part of the match played at the Birmingham tournament between the two above-mentioned champions, and were played on the 16th and 17th September.>

Although the games carry no further detail, it has seemed a reasonable assumption that they represent games 1 and 2 of the final. A belief apparently reinforced since the next number of <CPC> gives two further games, Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.73) and Falkbeer vs Loewenthal, 1858 (p.74) as <Game III> and <Game IV>, respectively.

And yet the final began on Monday, September 13th, according to the <Era> of September 19th, p.5,: <The Birmingham Tournament.- The concluding round in this protracted contest was commenced at the St George's Chess Club, on Monday, between Herren Falkbeer and Lowenthal. Up to this time four games have been played, of which each have won one, and two have been drawn.>

Suffice to say, something's got to give.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by xajik
Final (C.P.C, 1859, p.19)
from Birmingham 1858 by MissScarlett
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by Trigonometrist
Bishop+Rook sac...
from Collections in Idleness 5 by kishchess
Just because I like these games doesnt mean that
by xeroxmachine
pre-Steinitz Era2: 1861 or before
by Antiochus
p8riot's Sacrifices
by p8riot
24-
from Game collection: TIM by mughug
Chessman1's favorite games 3
by Chessman1


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC