chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Svetozar Gligoric
Varna ol (Men) fin-A (1962), Varna BUL, rd 11, Oct-09
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf. Zagreb (Fianchetto) Variation (B91)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Fischer/Gligoric games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-26-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: If, as PVS suggested, White is clearly winning after move 24, what is the winning plan? The position looks double-edged to me, since Black has the plan of undermining White's advanced kingside pawns and infiltrating behind the lines as happened in the game.

What should White have done instead of the game line after move 24? Perhaps try to occupy the d-file and attempt to break through that way?

Jun-10-07  utssb: The arguments of 'drukenknight' are incomprehensible. Only empty insults towards Fischer, nothing more.
Jun-10-07  RookFile: Gligoric was a very strong player, no one need apologize for losing a game to him.
Jan-14-09  M.D. Wilson: This is a great game by Gligoric. His record against Fischer is impressive. One always gets the impression with Gligoric that he always knew what he wanted to do OTB and no one was going to get in his way.
Aug-04-10  elohah: I'll have to see what Mednis says about this. This is still complicated to me.
Dec-31-11  BwanaVa: Mednis (in "How to Beat Bobby Fischer) says Gligoricv sealed 43...Rxg2, and that Fischer resigned after Gligo demonstrated "the simple wins after 44. Kxg2 Qc1 eg 45.Kf3 Qf1+ 46.Ke3 Rh3+ 47.Kd4 Qf2+ 48. Kc4 Qc2+ 49. Kd3 Qc3 mate."
Dec-31-11  BwanaVa: As per comments above, Mednis also labels 41. Kg3? as the final blunder, saying that after 41.Kf3 there must be a win for black, but it is not elementary. If 41...Rf1+ 42.Kg3 Rxg2+ 43.Kxg2 Mednis feels White is better than in the game as the Black Rook is better positioned generally on h1 instead of f1, and on f1 the Rook takes g1 and h1 away from the Black Queen.
Dec-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Fischer was up against an empire.. a system.. a monolith.

No other player in chess history has faced down such an opponent. Out of nothing, solitary, alone....

Dec-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: My above post was meant for elsewhere would you believe ! It's new year and I've had a few lol
Dec-31-11  Nemesistic: OH SHUT THE F*@K UP <HARRYSLIME>

< an empire.. a system.. a monolith.. >

FISCHER WAS A CHESS PLAYER !!!

A......CHESS.......PLAYER !! Not CHRIST ALL EFFIN MIGHTY !!

And iv'e had a few too..So for amusement purposes please tell me again WHY Fischer "Changed the world as we know it today"??

Dec-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: You're a dick. Sober up.
Dec-31-11  Nemesistic: Your a knobhead.. Have an Appletini.
Dec-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: You don't know me anymore than I know you.. I can beat you at chess tho.. lol
Dec-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HAPERSAUD: nice guys :), as usual chess commentary has moved from chess. keep it up.
Aug-22-14  ChessYouGood: Great win by Gligoric, punishing Fischer, whose only idea was to mindlessly thrust the kindside pawns
Aug-22-14  Howard: Could someone please call up his Uncle Fritz (or his nephew Houdini) and find out if 41.Kf3 would have held the draw ?!

As one person pointed out earlier, according to Mednis, "there must be a win" for Black, nevertheless, but "it is not elementary."

Surely Fritz and/or Rybka and/or Houdini could settle this once and for all, verdad ?

Feb-26-15  Howard: Hmmm....let me reiterate. Would 41.Kf3 have held the draw. As a previous commentator points out, Mednis stated in his book that "there must be a win for Black" even if Fischer DID play that move, but the win "is not elementary." But, then, back in 1975 (when the book came out), we didn't have Rybka, Houdini, Stockfish, etc.

And I don't have a computer (yet). So, perhaps, someone could help us out here.

WAS there a win after 43.Kf3 ?!

Feb-26-15  Nosnibor: According to Gligoric if 43Kf3,Rxg2.44Qxg2,Qc1 etc. wins
Feb-26-15  Retireborn: <Howard> Houdini gives 43.Kf3 Rf1+ wins easily: 44.Kg3 Rxg2+ 45.Kxg2 Qc1 46.Qe2 Rg1+ and White will eventually lose his Q or be mated.

44.Kf3 Rxg2 as given by Gligoric/<Nosnibor> also wins in much the same way.

Feb-26-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Howard> According to Stockfish 6, after 43.Kf3 Black has two forced mates at d=36 (the second mate was originally discovered at d=28 in 17 moves) :

1. [-M10]: 41...Qf5+ 42.Rf4 Rd3+ 43.Qe3 Rf1+ 44.Rf2 Qh3+ (I've never seen such a perfect coordination of heavy pieces.) 45.Ke2 Rxe3+ 46.Kd2 Rc3 47.R4f3 Rxf3 48.Rxf1 Qxf1 49.f7 Qg2+ 50.Ke1 Rf1#


click for larger view

2. [-M15]: 41...Qh5+ 42.Reg4 Qf5+ 43.Ke3 Qxe5+ 44.Kf2 Qf5+ 45.Ke3 Qxf6 (here the game is clearly won for Black but in comparison with the previous line, this approach seems overly materialistic) 46.Qc2 Qe5+ 47.Re4 Re1+ 48.Kf2 (48.Re2 Qg3#) 48...Rxe4 49.Rg3 Rf7+ 50.Kg2 Re2+ 51.Qxe2 Qxe2+ 52.Kh3 Rf4 53.Rd3 Qg4+ 54.Kh2 Rf2+ 55.Kh1 Qg2#


click for larger view

Komodo 8 indicates a similar result as early as d=19:

1. [-M10]: 41...Qf5+ 42.Rf4 Rh3+ 43.Kf2 Qxf4+ 44.Kg1 Qc1+ 45.Kf2 Qc5+ 46.Ke1 Rh1+ 47.Qf1 Qc1+ 48.Ke2 Qxf1+ 49.Ke3 Rd3+ 50.Ke4 Qf3#. Not as pretty as Stockfish's 10-move mate but just as effective.


click for larger view

2. [-M17]: 41...Qh5+ 42.Reg4 Qf5+ 43.Ke3 Qxe5+ 44.Kf2 Qxf6+ 45.Qf3 Rf1+ 46.Kxf1 Qxf3+ 47.Kg1 Qe3+ 48.Rf2 Rf7 49.Rgg2 Qe1+ 50.Kh2 Rxf2 51.Rxf2 Qxf2+ 52.Kh1 Qxa2 (seems materialistic but the alternate approach 52...Kxh6 53.a4 takes longer because there are stalemating possibilities to be avoided) 53.Kg1 a4 54.Kh1 Qd2 55.Kg1 a3 56.Kh1 a2 57.Kg1 a1Q#


click for larger view

So I'm afraid that in the case of this game the news of Fischer's possible survival were greatly exaggerated.

Feb-27-15  Howard: Guys, thanks very, very much ! So Mednis was right---there "must" have been a win after 41.Kf3....and there was !
Feb-28-15  Howard: HOLD IT !

There's a typo in a couple of the above comments, and I helped perpetuate it.

Fischer's opportunity to play 43.Kf3 was indeed on the 43rd move-----NOT the 41st one. A reader posted "41.Kf3" in a December, 2011 comment, and I just echoed it yesterday.

To repeat, the key position is from where Fischer could have played 43.Kf3--not "41.Kf3". Besides, playing Kf3 on the 41st move would have lost on the spot.

And it turns out.....Muller's excellent book on Fischer's games DOES explain briefly why 43.Kf3 would have lost. But then a couple sharp-eyed readers (and their silicon friends) show in much more detail why it would have lost, too.

Just wanted to clarify that !

Jan-04-16  Howard: Remind me to dig up my copy of Mednis' book, so as to review this game.
Jan-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Dig up Mednis!
Apr-22-17  Howard: One of these days, I'm gonna look at the above-posted analysis as to why Fischer would have lost after 43..Kf3. Just haven't gotten around to it yet.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 24
from I Play Against Pieces (Gligoric) by Qindarka
Fischer's losses with White
by amadeus
G137 inSvetozar Gligoric Collected Games, Edited by Colin Leach
from 1960s- The Lasting War by fredthebear
Game 42 in How to Beat Bobby Fischer by Edmar Mednis
from yRoundhouse Ruuks 4 by fredthebear
24 - Sicilian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by nakul1964
Pushy Fischer but Black smoothly penetrated their rear.
from 1962 Men Chess Olympiad by chessmoron
According to Gligoric
from The Sicilian-Najdorf According to ... by parisattack
Varna Olympiad 1962
by Adriano Saldanha
g3 little flank
from Sicilian by freeman8201
446
from Yugoslav Chess Triumphs, Part 1 by Chessdreamer
24 - Sicilian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by jakaiden
24 - Sicilian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by nakul1964
Game 42
from How to Beat Bobby Fischer (Mednis) by Qindarka
Varna Olympiad Final 1962 Rd.11
from Favorite Games from (1960-1979) by wanabe2000


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC