chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Istvan Bilek
Havana (1965), Havana CUB, rd 12, Sep-12
French Defense: Classical. Burn Variation (C11)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 69 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Fischer/I Bilek game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-02-06  Autoreparaturwerkbau: Yep, hats down to 35.f4!
Dec-16-08  Helios727: On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?
Dec-16-08  tonsillolith: <On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?>

I think because neither of the two rooks were on open files, so it would take several moves to get them doubled up or coordinated. Plus, the black king was exposed. Both of those factors would allow white's queen to go around picking off the undefended pawns.

Apr-26-09  madlydeeply: sweet ending.
Apr-26-09  madlydeeply: i suppose since the black king was open to harassment from the white queen...black never had time to get his rooks working together v. the white king.
Apr-26-09  madlydeeply: i daresay Fishcer often chooses open rook files over abysmal pawn structures (16 gxf3)
Apr-26-09  AnalyzeThis: <Helios727: On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks? >

He saw h5. This meant Qg6 and a pawn drops.

But, he had to see even deeper than this, because with two rooks, when they really go to work, they can win any pawn, and the queen can't defend.

Fischer saw that black couldn't set that up here.

Apr-12-11  Shams: Roman "the original [CTRL] + [V]" Dzindzichashvili lightly video annotates this game here, starting at ten minutes in:

[unknown player]

Apr-14-11  znsprdx: <Helios727: On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?> answered in this same video Fischer-BILEK

[unknown player]

at 21:01 mark

Apr-14-11  znsprdx: actually I'm feeling kinda stupid if 14...a6 supposedly 15.Qxh6 is the big move? Amazing is this line: 14....f6 15.Bd3 g5 16.hxg5 f5 17.Rh1 Qg7 18. R[g]h3 Q x[Q]h6 19.Rx[Q]h6

supposing R[a]d8 to hold the knight.
20. Rh8+ Kf7 R[1] h7+ Kg6

now it is mate in 5 - have fun!

My only problem is how did the French defense survive after this :)

Jul-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: (a) <, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?> and (b) <My only problem is how did the French defense survive after this :)>

Heh. By coincidence, I played a tournament game last weekend where - as Black in the French - I reached an eminently winnable position with Queen (and outside passed pawn) versus two Rooks.

Initiative is the key. It's actually the only viable strategy, because the Queen is such a poor defender. You aim to target your opponent's weaker pawns, while steadily improving your King position, and using tactical threats - mates, pins, skewers, forks - to restrict the mobility of the enemy King and Rooks.

Of course the Rooks have the firepower to concentrate forces on an isolated pawn and win it. The trick is to make sure that any such attack leads to mass exchanges and a winning pawn ending, usually because the enemy King has been lured or driven away from its own pawns.

You have to be careful, in most cases, not to advance your passer too quickly -- except, of course, in positions where the defending pieces are temporarily placed on awkward squares, and you can ram the pawn home before they regroup.

It sounds more complicated than it is. Having said that, my game went wrong ... I missed a couple of clear wins, then dropped my passed pawn in a position where my opponent could hold the draw by a single tempo.

Which is how a moment of carelessness after 80 moves turns a win into a draw. I didn't even learn from the experience, because I did almost exactly the same thing in the next round, this time in a Rook ending with an extra pawn. A win until move 85, when I inexplicably let it slip to a draw.

Sigh.

Oh, and the answer to the question about the French? There are many other sub-variations out there. I've played the French for 30 years without once feeling the need to play this 3...Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 line.

Mr Burn's variation, I believe. All very well for a casual game on <Burn's Night> aka Hogmanay or New Year's Eve, when we celebrate Amos Burn's birthday on 31st December. But not the best line if Black wants to win, despite a recent flurry of fashionable interest among GMs.

Aug-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Helios727: On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?>

Great a calculator as Fischer was, this comes under the oft-amorphous heading of judgment, as there's little doubt in my mind that he had intended this when playing the committal 16.gxf3 instead of the natural 16.Rxf3.

Once White plays 16.gxf3, he is forced to attack, as he may count himself lucky to hold any of these endings with heavy pieces, particularly if queens should come off.

Even a much weaker player like myself can see that Black's rooks have trouble getting co-ordinated, but only a player with the technical mastery of Fischer can make the winning process look simple.

It's ironic that the rooks only get to work together, in the most desultory fashion, when their king's cause is lost.

Feb-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: 16.gf seems entirely natural to me.
Mar-24-12  JoergWalter: many answers are given here:

[unknown player]

Aug-01-15  ToTheDeath: A really nice game, 12.Bb5! is a star move delaying Blacks development. The position with Queen vs two rooks is very easily winning owing to the exposed king, the outpost on g6 supported by the advanced h5 pawn and the loose pawns on c7 and h6. Fischer was experienced enough to correctly assess this as winning ahead of time. By the time Black gets coordinated it's too late.
Feb-20-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Helios727: On move 18, how did Fischer know that his queen would beat the two rooks?>

Three or 4 posters have given excellent responses to this question. I will now give a cynical response:

In the French Defense, the first player to castle will nearly always lose.

Black castled first, so White could be confident in the win.

Mar-30-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: "Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess" (Bantam Books, New York, 1966) uses this test position:


click for larger view

"This position could have occurred in my game with the Hungarian Grandmaster Bilek in the 1965 Havana Tournament. My opponent avoided this position."

After 17. Rdg1 Black played 17 ... f6. On 17 ... Rg8 White has 18. Rxg7! Rxg7 19. Qxh6+ Rh7 leading to the diagram, then Mate in Two with 20. Qf6+ Rg7 21. Qxg7#.

Jul-09-18  tonsillolith: Looking back at this game, I still find it amazing to see the transformation from move 20 to move 39. It's like Black didn't do anything except give up pawns and allow White to undouble his pawns.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
chinaski's favorite games
by chinaski
superior wQ due to weak black pawns
from 04_Q:RR by whiteshark
Marginalized Visionwise...
from Manuel G. Vergara's favorite games by Manuel G. Vergara
Classical. Burn Variation
from French C11s by fredthebear
BFTC: Box 121, page 148 (modified)
from Book Master Bob Long Helped Fredthebear BackWhen by fredthebear
Box 121, page 148 (modified)
from Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess by nakul1964
others + sicilian
by hartkoka
Havana CAP 1965
from Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by wanabe2000
Instructional Remedies Vs. French Defense
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Classical. Burn Variation
from MKD's French Defense by MKD
Instructional Remedies Vs. French Defense
by southpawjinx
13: 35. f4
from Pandolfini's "Bobby Fischer's Outrageous Moves" by blingice
french defense
from benjobench's fischer games by benjobench
Havana CAP 1965
from Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by fernando.laroca


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC