chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Boris Spassky
Second Piatigorsky Cup (1966), Santa Monica, CA USA, rd 17, Aug-14
Spanish Game: Marshall Attack. Modern Variation (C89)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Fischer/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-19-04  Franz the Stampede: what about 12.Bxd5 so that the black has an isolated pawn on the d file?
Sep-21-04  Knight13: I think Spassky really wanted a draw here. If he dosen't, he would play 34... Bc6.
Sep-21-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <I think Spassky really wanted a draw here. If he dosen't, he would play 34... Bc6.>

That would allow 35. ♖a6 , pinning and winning the bishop.

Dec-20-06  Tartalacreme: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 0-0 8. c3 d5 9. exd5 Nxd5 10. Nxe5 Nxe5 11. Rxe5 c6 12. Re1 Bd6 13. g3 Qd7 14.d3/d4 Qh3 transposes to the main lines.
Dec-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: A somewhat delayed reply but Spassky definitely was satisfied with a draw here. This game was played in the next to last round of the tournament and Fischer and Spassky were tied for the lead at this point. In the last round Fischer was scheduled to have Black against Petrosian and Spassky was scheduled to have White against Donner, the tournament tailender (along with Ivkov). Not unreasonably, Spassky thought that his chances of beating Donner with White were better than Fischer beating Petrosian with Black. This was also tournament director Isaac Kashdan's opinion in the tournament book.
Dec-19-12  12.12.12: if so, then the "russian bear" was fully awake here and wearing massive balls, given the circumstance.
Jan-10-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Playing over the Fischer-Spassky games from Santa Monica, 1966, you can start to see why Spassky was comparatively confident when he met Fischer in 1972. As white, Spassky wins a smooth Ruy Lopez, in which Fischer finds good defensive moves but never achieves significant counterplay. As black, in a nerve-wracking tournament situation, Spassky is able to "draw-to-order."

Here's Spassky's comment on 12.g3: "The move should be looked at skeptically as White voluntarily agrees to a weakening of his king's wing, neglecting the development of his pieces. The positive side of the continuation lies in the fact that White prevents the standard attack by Black through ....Bd6 and ....Qh4."

Spassky's one scary moment in this game is that he planned a new idea with 13....c5 and rejected it at the last moment because of 14.Bg5. Instead, he segues back into a standard ideas in the Marshall Gambit.

Spassky says that he was never in danger after the exchange of queens. I think Spassky might have been a pioneer in jettisoning material for the sake of defense -- he seemed to have no trouble playing entire endgames a pawn down if he could secure some activity for his pieces. Obviously, he's not the first person to come up with the idea of 'compensation' -- but he seemed to accept material disadvantages (even in 'positional games' ) more readily than other grandmasters of the period.

Nov-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Fischer, Spassky and Jacqueline Piatigorsky

https://s5o.ru/storage/simple/ru/ug...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7ReU0K...

Nov-11-17  john barleycorn: Thanks <stonehenge> for the pics
Sep-26-19  Everett: <zydeco> Even chess fans forget just how difficult to defeat Spassky was for nearly a decade, from 61-71.

I think Fischer was wise to wait until Spassky was a more complacent world champion. During the 60ís, I donít think Fischer beats a motivated Spassky.

Sep-27-19  woldsmandriffield: Interesting to compare the Piatigorskysí sponsorship of chess in the 1960s with the Sinquefelds today.
Sep-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: I wonder what's going on in the second picture in Stonehenge's post?

I saw Fischer's pawn on g3 and thought it was this game, but Fischer's king is still on e1?

The board looks like both knights are developed Nf3/Nf6, and Fischer's pawn is on g3????

Obviously not a game as Fischer never
opens Nf3 or g3.

Sep-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <diceman> He might in blitz.

Fischer vs Tal, 1970

But my guess is that, after a few pictures of them chatting, the photographer said "how about some pictures of you guys playing chess?" and neither one of them wanted to play anything that might show up in the real game.

Nice photos from Stonehenge.

Sep-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: I guess the game starts when
Mrs. Piatigorsky leaves. :)
Sep-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Same old same old POSTERS knocking BOBBY.

Just embarrassing.

RJF IS THE GREATEST.

Sep-29-19  ewan14: Obviously ! In his prime he was afraid to play the King's Indian because of the Samisch
Sep-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <ewan14> I dunno, I would have thought 1971 counted as Fischer's prime.

Fischer - Taimanov Candidates Quarterfinal (1971)

Fischer - Larsen Candidates Semifinal (1971)

Sep-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Facing Spassky, he would have run up against the Saemisch: Taimanov's speciality was known to be the Classical line, and Larsen was hardly likely to go in for a Saemisch either.
Sep-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <perfidious: Facing Spassky, he would have run up against the Saemisch: Taimanov's speciality was known to be the Classical line, and Larsen was hardly likely to go in for a Saemisch either.>

Fair enough, but <ewan> didn't limit himself that way. Also, Fischer is playing White in the game in the picture, so avoiding the Saemisch should be a piece of cake. :-)

Larsen said before the Fischer match that he'd prepared "several surprises," so the Saemisch might have been anticipated.

IIRC, in Profile of a Prodigy Brady quotes a chess writer expressing mild surprise that Fischer would play the King's Indian against Taimanov, since Taimanov was sure to be very well-prepared against it.

Sep-30-19  RookFile: I must say, in playing over this game, that Spassky didn't break a sweat in making a draw out of this.
Sep-30-19  ewan14: Neither Taimanov nor Larsen usually played the Saemisch against the Kings Indian. Simples.

Was Larsen not playing the French in game one one of the surprises ?

Spassky used the Marshall attack against Tal in their 1965 match with great sucess

Sep-30-19  Otoy: <Knight13: I think Spassky really wanted a draw here. If he dosen't, he would play 34... Bc6.>

Wow, that's a strong authoritative words. He must be a strong Grandmaster himself.

Oct-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: SAME OLD SAME OLD posters knocking Bobby.

Fischer was NUMBER ONE IN THE CHESS WORLD from 1961 onwards.

The SOVIET COMMIE REDS owned chess and fixed chess back then.

Oct-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Most posters on this site just don't get it ...

FISCHER WAS AND IS THE GREATEST.

Oct-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: yea, what's wrong with us?
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Santa Monica (1) 1966
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
Game 38
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by Patca63
76
from Chess in the USSR 1945 - 72, Part 2 (Leach) by Chessdreamer
Game 61
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
128
from Chess in the USA 1945-72, Part 1 (Leach) by Chessdreamer
Game 38
from How to Reassess Your Chess 4th ed by Silman by skybluesky
Second Piatigorsky Cup Round #17
from Second Piatigorsky Cup, Santa Monica, CA 1966 by wanabe2000
Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966
by matey
Round 17 August 14th
from Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966 by Benzol
Game 38 in How to Reassess Your Chess by IM Jeremy Silman
from -ER Fischer by fredthebear
kayleff's favorite games
by kayleff
Game 38
from How to Reassess Your Chess 4th ed by Silman by Patca63
Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966
by nakul1964
Round 17 August 14th
from Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 38
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by Qindarka
Game 38
from How to Reassess your Chess (Silman) by isfsam
Game 56
from Decisive Games (Pachman) by Qindarka
Game 56 in 'Pachman's Decisive Games' by Ludek Pachman
from 1960s- The Rise of Fredthebear & Fischer King by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC