chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Vlastimil Hort
Herceg Novi blitz (1970) (blitz), Herceg Novi MNE, rd 5, Apr-08
Slav Defense: General (D10)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Fischer/Hort games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <if you ask me, he was just showing off> Fischer also opened games in this tournament 1 f4 and 1 g3. Maybe he didn't take blitz seriously?! Perish the thought!
Dec-21-05  KingG: < Fischer also opened games in this tournament 1 f4 and 1 g3. Maybe he didn't take blitz seriously?!> Larsen played these moves in classical games. I'm sure he took those seriously. Fischer was known to use opening novelties in Blitz games, so i think he took blitz more seriously than most. Can you imagine Kasparov using opening novelties in blitz??
Dec-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <KingG> <Can you imagine Kasparov using opening novelties in blitz??> You know, he beat me in a simul without using ANY novelties whatsoever. I was very hurt.

<In my opinion, Fischer may have actually been even better suited to 1.d4 than 1.e4.>

Fischer was intellectually wedded to 1 e4 -- not that I am telling you anything you don't know. He was the last of the opening absolutists, the last really strong player to believe there was a "best move" even in the starting position. I think his use of 1 c4 and Alekhine's and Pirc's at the end of his career was purely pragmatic. If he had kept playing he would have had to broaden his repetoire. But I don't think he ever would have played 1 d4 with white or say, the French or Caro-Kann with black. He just didn't believe in them!

I think you have a point re his style. The Ruy was almost perfect for him -- pity we never saw him play it against Karpov! That would have been fascinating. But obviously he loved forcing lines too, and 1 e4 gave him a lot of scope for those.

In general, (and I know you and <danielpi> discussed this in detail) I don't think you can decide that a player should choose 1 e4 or 1 d4 based on whether you characterize his style as positional or tactical. Karpov was a tremendous 1 e4 player, while Kasparov and Shirov made their names as attacking players using 1 d4. Kasparov liked to build up his attacks into great crescendoes, while keeping the position as complex as possible (who would have believed that 4 a3 in the Queen's Indian could be an attacking move?), while Karpov and Fischer tended more towards multiple sharp little struggles with clear resolutions within each game. Maybe that is the difference between 1 d4 and 1 e4 (to the extent there really is a difference) -- 1 d4 tends more towards the former type of game, and 1 e4 the latter.

Mar-13-06  zev22407: Fischer played d4 against Tal in this blitz tournament ,in a book I have with all Fischer game the first moves where (Fischer white) 1)d4 N-f6 2)Nf3 g6 3)g3 and so on,
whith d4,f4 c4 unusual moves for him he used a a surprise weapon .
Mar-13-06  Boomie: In rounds 6, 8, 12 and 14 of the world championship against Spassky, Fischer opened c4. These games quickly transposed into queen's gambits or English in the case of round 8. This was Fischer's secret weopon against Spassky. When he played 1. c4 in round 6, a minor earthquake was caused by jaws dropping all over Russia.
Mar-17-06  Ludamad: <a minor earthquake was caused by jaws dropping all over Russia.> We can only imagine our fate if he played 1. f3.
Apr-14-06  Maatalkko: This is probably the simplest Fischer game I've ever seen. I won't be so arrogant as to critique his play, but I really have no idea how he hoped to get an advantage in this game. Of course, it was blitz, and maybe he wasn't after an advantage anyway.
Apr-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Well, if you say: <Best by test!>, you need to have some control sample, don't ya? :-).

Looking at Fischer's opening stats, it indeed looks like the <1.e4> is the (second) best opening ... when Fischer is White. When Fischer is Black, <1.e4> turns out to be the (second) worst way to open a game!!! (In both cases, <1.e4> trails <1.f4> for the ultimate best/worst honor.)

Repertoire Explorer: Robert James Fischer (black)

Apr-14-06  IMDONE4: Fischer disliked d4 because although a safer choice than e4, it gives black many more equalizing chances. For example here, this game was a very quiet draw, as one would imagine this to be played by Petrosian or Schlecter. Im actually quite amazed that their would be so many kibitzes on this game.
Apr-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <IMDONE4> In Slav QGD, after the <1.d4>, bland and drawish Exchange is a White's choice, not Black's. If White foregoes the Exchange, there is nothing bland or drawish about Slav. On the other hand, Petroff or Berlin, after <1.e4>, are for practical purposes fully Black's choices.
Apr-14-06  IMDONE4: I'll keep that in mind :)
Apr-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Always happy to help. :-))
Oct-02-06  Tenderfoot: He probably had the King and Queen in the wrong place and thus moved the wrong pawn. I've done that before and my opponent wouldn't let me take it back. Surely this happens at the professional level as well.
Oct-02-06  Tenderfoot: Also, I'm going to have to agree with <Knezh>...this is some pretty boring chess.
Oct-02-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < Im actually quite amazed that their would be so many kibitzes on this game.>

Probably the best comment on this thread.

Oct-02-06  RookFile: Hort was a strong player. My guess is that Fischer didn't want to see a particular variation on the board after 1. e4. Not that he was afraid of whatever it was, of course, but maybe he didn't want to reveal his best weapons against it.
Jan-15-07  GufeldStudent: This may be Fischer's least memorable game.
Sep-10-07  D4n: I agree with GueldStudent on this one...
Sep-10-07  RookFile: The final position is one of pure symmetry.
Jan-23-08  porgue: wow fischers only d4 database game went pretty badly... (R.I.P)
Jan-24-08  RookFile: But during those days, nobody needed to apologize for getting 'only' a draw against Hort - he was a very strong player.
May-06-08  KingG: <keypusher> I know it was a while ago, but very good post.
Apr-16-14  jerseybob: Maatalko: Simplified is not the same as "simple". Even with reduced material there were some sneaky little traps for both sides along the way. And I don't agree that Fischer wasn't after an advantage; Fischer was always after the advantage!
Aug-14-17  Albion 1959: Fischer actually starting a game with 1.d4? Even it was only a five minute game !
Aug-14-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: So, we now know, without a doubt, Fischer started going cuckoo in 1970. =))
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
-ER Fischer
by fredthebear
Exchange Slav 6.Bf4 e6, leading to drawn ending
from Drawing lines by FSR
Fischer's Blitz Games at Herceg Novi, 1970
by OBIT
ROOT OF SPAWN or Bobby vs The Youth
by vonKrolock
Slav Defense: General (D10) 1/2-1/2 Blitz; notes by Stockfish
from EG Pawns EG; the Q might attend FTB's party by fredthebear
I have never opened with the QP - on principle
by Benzol


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC