chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Robert James Fischer vs Boris Spassky
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972)  ·  Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern Variation (B68)  ·  1/2-1/2
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Fischer/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-09-02  drukenknight: Game 20. Spassky plays another sicilian. why not 14 ...Nxd4?
Dec-09-02  PVS: 14...Nxd4 15. Bxb7 RaxB 16. Rxd2
Dec-10-02  drukenknight: I see what you are saying, black doesnt have to play it like that; he may be able to strip the white K of pawn protection; but I think white is fine.
Apr-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: I understand that this is the game that ended in a draw because Fischer claimed a repetition of position on moves 48, 50 and 54 -- although it was pointed out afterwards that the claim was invalid (on moves 48 and 50, white had just moved, while the position on move 54 occurred after black's move).
Feb-29-08  Knight13: <YouRang: I understand that this is the game that ended in a draw because Fischer claimed a repetition of position on moves 48, 50 and 54 -- although it was pointed out afterwards that the claim was invalid (on moves 48 and 50, white had just moved, while the position on move 54 occurred after black's move).> I thought it doesn't matter whose move it is; just that the position arives three times in a row.

Oh well it didn't seem like neither Black or White was making any progress.

Een vervelend spel!

Feb-29-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Hi <Knight13>.

<I thought it doesn't matter whose move it is; just that the position arives three times in a row.>

No, the rule is that the game can be declared a draw if same position(*) is about to occur for the 3rd time.

Note that the same position doesn't have to appear "three times in a row" (meaning 'on consecutive moves').

(*) It's important to understand what is meant by "same position". Of course, for two positions to be the same, the pieces must be placed exactly the same -- but this by itself is not sufficient. Even with the same arrangement of pieces, the two positions are NOT the same if:

- It's not the same player to move, OR

- The castling rights (for either side) are different, OR

- If an en-passant pawn capture is possible in one position but not in the other.

Feb-29-08  Knight13: <YouRang> Thanks for the clarification.
May-27-09  WhiteRook48: what a weird ending
Jun-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  DWINS: According to Robert Byrne in "Both Sides of the Chessboard", "Because of some vow, strategy or psychological consideration, Fischer was unwilling to reach a draw by offering it throughout the entire match."

Regarding the end of this game, he comments, "It was interesting how the draw was accomplished, when neither player could resort to the normal expedient of offering one. Bobby revealed his intention by calling over referee Lothar Schmid, and asking him, with a grin, 'Would you check the position to see if we have a three-time repetition?' He knew, of course, that there was none, and so did Spassky, but Boris got the message and agreed at once."

Feb-27-11  Tigranny: This wouldn't be a draw by repetition because the position would be different after 54...Nd4. It is the position that counts as a repetition, not the move.
Jul-20-12  blazerdoodle: It really doesn't matter, they both agreed.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: A heavyweight struggle typical of this phase of the match: Spassky gets some pressure in this ending, but not quite enough to squeeze more than the half point, after Fischer avoids his favourite 6.Bc4 against the Sicilian, as he had early on.
Jul-21-12  RookFile: Fischer may have trying to bait Spassky into overreaching himself.
Jul-29-12  Everett:   < RookFile: Fischer may have trying to bait Spassky into overreaching himself.>

Fischer may have pooped himself during this game.

Sep-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: In the Oct 1995 issue of Chess Life, in the Evans on Chess column, S. Sample wrote that Spassky said he missed a simple win in his 20th match game. He then asked if so, what was it? Evans couldn't find a simple win for Spassky, and just included the game asking if any of the readers could find a win. Move 41 was the sealed move and the game was adjourned there. I don't think any computer found a win. Perhaps 48...Nf3 is an improvement for Black, but probably no win.
May-22-14  newzild: <wwall> Stockfish suggests that Black should play Nf3 at several points. White is forced to capture, after which Black has two connected passed pawns and Stockfish evaluates the position as -0.71. However, in my opinion this is a "computer" evaluation. My human eye tells me that White can build a fortress by playing c3 and oscillating his King between e1-f2-g1. I can't see any way for Black to make progress.

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Match Fischer!
by amadeus
Fischer-Spassky World Championship Match 1972
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
Game #20
from Fischer-Spassky '72 by GPawn
Round 20
from WCC Index [Fischer-Spassky 1972] by Hesam7
242
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by jakaiden
SD27
from ANIL RAJ.R's KING PAWN GAMES by ANIL RAJ.R
Game 20, Fischer leads 11 1/2-8 1/2
from 1972 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Game 127
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Game 20
from Spassky-Fischer Match 1972 by FischerSpasskyGuy
#20 the last draw
from fischer-spassky by kevin86
B + N + PP vs NN + PP: unbalanced PP; drawing chances.
from Endgame themes. by Dr. Siggy
Game #20
from The Fischer-Spassky Reykjavik 1972 match by dac1990
Match Spassky!
by amadeus
World Championship Game #20
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by Fischer of Men
Fisher vs. Spassky 1972 Championship
by Pianoplayer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies