Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Max Euwe vs Robert James Fischer
Euwe - Fischer m (1957), New York, NY USA, rd 1, Mar-09
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Positional Variation (D35)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 141 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Euwe/Fischer games
sac: 18.a3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Petrosianic>< Yes, it was a two game match, and the second game was never printed. That's surprising, you'd think that a prominent junior star getting a draw with a former world champion would have been big news. But from Euwe's comments about the game, one gets the feeling that he gave Fischer a draw in a winning position, which would explain why they never bragged about it. Euwe commented that he'd been in trouble, but pulled off "something of a swindle", and stood "rather better" when the game ended. Read between the lines a little...>

Where did Euwe make these remarks about the drawn game? I haven't seen them.

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <The score of this game is not available,(second game) but Euwe remembers that the game followed Botvinnik v Euwe Leningrad 1934, for some way, Fischer got some advantage, Euwe pulled off something of a swindle and stood rather better when the draw was agreed.>

Complete Games of Bobby Fischer pg 123.

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Chanco, the second game draw is available here at CG. I don't know why Complete Games does not have it. It was certainly available then.

Fischer Euwe, M.
Ruy Lopez
match game 2

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Be7 10.Nbd2 O-O 11.Qe2 Nc5 12.Nd4 Nxb3 13.N2xb3 Qd7 14.Nxc6 Qxc6 15.Be3 Qc4 16.Qd2 draw.

Fischer deviated at move 15...Qc4 from the Leningrad game. Too bad we don't have the remaining moves. It was poorly reported in both Chess Life and Chess review.

Jan-11-10  Petrosianic: That's not a complete game, it's only the opening moves, which Euwe remembered when asked years later.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Euwe annotated his win in Bobby Fischer: The Greatest?.

Kmoch annotated it in Chess Review.

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <The Focus> what <Petrosianic> said.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: As most of you know, the Fischer-Euwe game is now available at Fischer vs Euwe, 1957.
Nov-04-11  lemonadepawn: Splendid game!
Jan-15-12  Zugzwangovich: Some of my sources for RJF games call the opening to this game a Nimzo-Indian, some call it the Ragozin variation of the QGD. Ditto for the 1st Fischer-Spassky game at Reykjavik. Can a clear distinction between these openings be made?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: <Zugz>

It's defiinitely not a Nimzo-Indian, and strictly speaking it's not a Ragozin either (no Nf3) but it's closer to the latter than the former. I would call it the Exchange Variation of the QGD.


Jan-15-12  Zugzwangovich: <Garech> Thanks, Sean. Looks to me like you need to update your bio; you have two games on now.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: <Zugz> No worries, and will do! Cheers,


Mar-24-13  wachter123680: Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate
Mar-24-13  wachter123680: and Fischer's 7c5 was a total waste of an up m.o.
Mar-24-13  RookFile: <Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate>

But that is a nasty pin on the f6 knight. Qd3 is going to happen with that nasty pin.

I don't know what the GM opinion is, but I suspect that it can't be right for black later to play Qb6. It really didn't even slow Euwe down, he just ignored the queenside pressure.

Mar-29-13  4play: Hi, was just wondering if after 20Nxd5 Qa5 as a response. Do yal think that could be played for black?
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <4play> Welcome to our happy family!

The move 20....Qa5 leaves a mate on with 21.Qh8.

Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <RookFile: <Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate> But that is a nasty pin on the f6 knight. Qd3 is going to happen with that nasty pin.

I don't know what the GM opinion is, but I suspect that it can't be right for black later to play Qb6. It really didn't even slow Euwe down, he just ignored the queenside pressure.>

Would'nt they play g5 in the position around moves 12 or 13 ?

Dec-05-14  kia0708: Smashing Robert Fischer in just 20 moves. WOW.
Oct-07-15  cg999: I agree kia0708.
Winning like these against one of the best player in the world does make you best as well.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: I like that the mate on h8 happens whether Black takes the knight or not.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Video analysis of this game:
Premium Chessgames Member
  OrangeTulip: Ouch, Bobby gets some first class spanking:)
Premium Chessgames Member
  OrangeTulip: But the mutual respect from here on perpaps helped the WC match Fischer-Spassky being realized
Oct-23-18  John Abraham: this game was played on Fischer's 14th birthday, while his opponent was 55 years old. quite a difference in experience level.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Direct attacks
by TheDestruktor
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange (D35) 1-0 Which kNight?
from Exchange In a Hurry to Exchange by fredthebear
by ALL
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange (D35) 1-0 Which kNight?
from Knights Add Spice D&E Shield Fredthebear by fredthebear
from Veliki majstori saha 18 EUWE (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Queen's Pawn
by GiantPickle
Chess Network Videos: Part 3
by Penguincw
Attack on the light squares
from Euwe's kingside attacks by micartouse
queen gambit
by rodrigochaves
Robert Fischer's Favorite-Players
by saveyougod
Max Euwe
by blues66
Across the generations
by Minor Piece Activity
consider end game mating possibilities
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
from kmeen by aymanslman
Great winning attack
from Stoned Knight's favorite games by Stoned Knight
raesv's favorite games
by raesv
tommy boy's favorite games 2
by tommy boy

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC