chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Max Euwe vs Robert James Fischer
New York m (1957)  ·  Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange. Positional Variation (D35)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 107 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Euwe/Fischer games
sac: 18.a3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-03-09  AnalyzeThis: Well, they didn't have Elo ratings until the 1960's, when Euwe was well past his prime. Just my opinion, but a guy who put 20 wins up on the board against Alekhine must have reached a strength of at least 2700 at some point.
Sep-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Boomie: For what it's worth, Chessmetrics reckons Euwe's rating at 2620 at the time of this match. Fischer was at 2452. His highest rating was 2769 after the first Alekhine match. http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/Play...
Sep-03-09  kooley782: Cool, thanks!
Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: This is game one of a three game match played in New York. (which Euwe won.)
Of course the kid from Brooklyn was still years away from becoming the phenomenon that he later became.
Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <chancho> <This is game one of a three game match played in New York. (which Euwe won.) Of course the kid from Brooklyn was still years away from becoming the phenomenon that he later became.>

Actually a two game match. Bobby drew the second game.

Nor would I say years away. He did win his first US Championship that same year a few months later.

Jan-11-10  Petrosianic: Yes, it was a two game match, and the second game was never printed. That's surprising, you'd think that a prominent junior star getting a draw with a former world champion would have been big news. But from Euwe's comments about the game, one gets the feeling that he gave Fischer a draw in a winning position, which would explain why they never bragged about it. Euwe commented that he'd been in trouble, but pulled off "something of a swindle", and stood "rather better" when the game ended. Read between the lines a little...
Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Yeah, it was two games.
I looked at the total number: 1/2 and 1/1/2 total and confused it as a third game. Mea culpa.

<The Focus> I had a feeling someone would make a mountain out of a molehill with the comment I posted. I was referring to Fischer in the 1970's and what he accomplished on his run to the world title. Winning the US Championship at the age of 14 was a notable accomplishment.

Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Petrosianic>< Yes, it was a two game match, and the second game was never printed. That's surprising, you'd think that a prominent junior star getting a draw with a former world champion would have been big news. But from Euwe's comments about the game, one gets the feeling that he gave Fischer a draw in a winning position, which would explain why they never bragged about it. Euwe commented that he'd been in trouble, but pulled off "something of a swindle", and stood "rather better" when the game ended. Read between the lines a little...>

Where did Euwe make these remarks about the drawn game? I haven't seen them.

Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <The score of this game is not available,(second game) but Euwe remembers that the game followed Botvinnik v Euwe Leningrad 1934, for some way, Fischer got some advantage, Euwe pulled off something of a swindle and stood rather better when the draw was agreed.>

Complete Games of Bobby Fischer pg 123.

Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Chanco, the second game draw is available here at CG. I don't know why Complete Games does not have it. It was certainly available then.

Fischer Euwe, M.
Ruy Lopez
match game 2

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Be7 10.Nbd2 O-O 11.Qe2 Nc5 12.Nd4 Nxb3 13.N2xb3 Qd7 14.Nxc6 Qxc6 15.Be3 Qc4 16.Qd2 draw.

Fischer deviated at move 15...Qc4 from the Leningrad game. Too bad we don't have the remaining moves. It was poorly reported in both Chess Life and Chess review.

Jan-11-10  Petrosianic: That's not a complete game, it's only the opening moves, which Euwe remembered when asked years later.
Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Euwe annotated his win in Bobby Fischer: The Greatest?.

Kmoch annotated it in Chess Review.

Jan-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <The Focus> what <Petrosianic> said.
Oct-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: As most of you know, the Fischer-Euwe game is now available at Fischer vs Euwe, 1957.
Nov-04-11  lemonadepawn: Splendid game!
Jan-15-12  Zugzwangovich: Some of my sources for RJF games call the opening to this game a Nimzo-Indian, some call it the Ragozin variation of the QGD. Ditto for the 1st Fischer-Spassky game at Reykjavik. Can a clear distinction between these openings be made?
Jan-15-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: <Zugz>

It's defiinitely not a Nimzo-Indian, and strictly speaking it's not a Ragozin either (no Nf3) but it's closer to the latter than the former. I would call it the Exchange Variation of the QGD.

-Garech

Jan-15-12  Zugzwangovich: <Garech> Thanks, Sean. Looks to me like you need to update your bio; you have two games on chessgames.com now.
Jan-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: <Zugz> No worries, and will do! Cheers,

-Garech

Mar-24-13  wachter123680: Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate
Mar-24-13  wachter123680: and Fischer's 7c5 was a total waste of an up m.o.
Mar-24-13  RookFile: <Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate>

But that is a nasty pin on the f6 knight. Qd3 is going to happen with that nasty pin.

I don't know what the GM opinion is, but I suspect that it can't be right for black later to play Qb6. It really didn't even slow Euwe down, he just ignored the queenside pressure.

Mar-29-13  4play: Hi, was just wondering if after 20Nxd5 Qa5 as a response. Do yal think that could be played for black?
Mar-29-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <4play> Welcome to our happy family!

The move 20....Qa5 leaves a mate on with 21.Qh8.

Nov-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <RookFile: <Fischer could have taken the knight at 12. the same piece was instrumental in mate> But that is a nasty pin on the f6 knight. Qd3 is going to happen with that nasty pin.

I don't know what the GM opinion is, but I suspect that it can't be right for black later to play Qb6. It really didn't even slow Euwe down, he just ignored the queenside pressure.>

Would'nt they play g5 in the position around moves 12 or 13 ?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Robert Fischer's Favorite-Players
by saveyougod
poetry in the form of chess
from Bondsamir's favorite games by Bondsamir
Euwe, the best dutch player ever
from CommaVid's favorite games by CommaVid
Max Euwe
by blues66
tommy boy's favorite games 2
by tommy boy
Max Euwe: +1, -1, =1
from Fischer's rare defeats. by nikolaas
Brilliant games
by madhatter5
Attack on the light squares
from Euwe's kingside attacks by micartouse
Great winning attack
from Stoned Knight's favorite games by Stoned Knight
Fischer loses in 20 to Euwe
from Great players lose miniatures by FSR
Bjelica_125
by Gottschalk
Sandbox - for just digging around
by zanzibar
70 Help, I' m Fisch!
from Herkus' favorite games by Herkus
Best Games of All Time
by dull2vivid
+0 -1 =1 vs. Euwe, New York, 1957
from Match Fischer! by amadeus
euwe sweeps fischer off the board
from fav Kramnik & Euwe games by guoduke
Back Rank Mate
from Frank124c's Favorite Games--Themes by frank124c
consider end game mating possibilities
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
Euwe
from Champions miniature champions by alexmagnus
Max Euwe vs. Robert James Fischer 1 - 1 (plus 1 draw)
from Euwe vs. the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
plus 16 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies