Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Borislav Ivkov vs Robert James Fischer
Second Piatigorsky Cup (1966), Santa Monica, CA USA, rd 3, Jul-20
Indian Game: King's Indian. Fianchetto Variation (A49)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 66 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Ivkov/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: While Fischer's well-known antipathy towards 1.d4 and the openings arising therefrom until 1970 was legend, he provides a masterly example of how to play a classic minority attack (with reversed colours) in this game.
Mar-06-06  RookFile: Black really owned everything. Normally when black plays these types of setups, his minority attack on the queenside is to some degree counterbalanced by white having greater control over e5. That doesn't happen here: Fischer has both knights AND his bishop watching e5 while also undertaking the minority attack.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Going into this game, Fischer's score against Ivkov was +0-2=3; from this game forward it was +4-0=1.
Dec-12-14  zydeco: Ivkov's self-lacerating notes to this game are amusing.

6.Nc3: "A man will sometimes ask himself after a game why he did not play the normal, 'classical' moves. Really, why is not the better move 6.c4, which I had been playing in innumerable games up to the present? I wanted to get away from the prepared variations of my young opponent - that would be the only explanation for the inferior move 6.Nc3. I would say with astonishment that to a reasonable extent I succeeded - the position which I obtained from the opening was actually better."

Ivkov is following a Spassky-Bronstein game through to move 14 when he deviated with the inferior 14.N4d3.

14.N4d3: "I thought that Bobby would not give up one of his bishops, due to his known love for these pieces. But Bobby always plays the strongest moves regardless of favorites."

20.Bf3: "....The move in this position is 20.a4 to delay black's advance on the queenside. It is not clear to me why I did not play it. Moreover, it is not clear how I could find so many weak moves in one game. It seems that such things happen."

22.Qe2: "A move without sense."

24.Be5: "Less harmful would be 24.Be5."

36.Rf3: "The last error - thank God!"

42.White resigns: "Fischer, with his fine technique, took advantage of the poor play of his opponent."

May-14-15  Howard: Fischer either played a Closed Sicilian against Ivkov or a KI Reversed---it's a bit debatable as to which name to use.

For the record, Evans referred to it as a KI Reversed in a 1978 column of his.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
2nd Piatgorsky Cup, Santa Monica 1966
from Fischer 101 by Parkov
The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation after ..d5xe4
from Modern Chess Strategy III by Ludek Pachman by Bidibulle
Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966
by matey
CLUB Line (black): King's Indian
by lomez
Second Piatigorsky Cup Round #3
from Second Piatigorsky Cup, Santa Monica, CA 1966 by wanabe2000
Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966
by Benzol
by MKD
Q-side minority attack
from Positional Games by Del ToRo
Second Piatigorsky Cup 1966
by JoseTigranTalFischer
The Minority Attack: The Change in Pawn Formation after ..d5xe4
from Modern Chess Strategy III by Ludek Pachman by Del ToRo
Q-side minority attack
from Positional Games by Funology
2nd Piatgorsky Cup, Santa Monica 1966
from Fischer 101 by rea
by KingG

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC