Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972), Reykjavik ISL, rd 5, Jul-20
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Huebner Variation. Main Line (E41)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 83 times; par: 42 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-21-14  Olavi: And Larsen vs Ivkov, 1973 is another classic in this line. Then, Unzicker vs Timman, 1981
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Kasparov made it his thesis in "Revolution in the 70's" that the Fischer -Spassky match triggered a surge in opening preparation.

Had Fischer chosen to play in 75, he would have had to revamp all his openings, because his ideas, while new, had flaws that came to light when countless masters experimented with them.

Fischer was talented enough to adapt, but it would have entailed working with others, which he hated, or later, working with computers, which he thought was cheating, just to process all the new information.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: I think Karpov also described Fischer as the last of the "Old School Champions", who worked mainly on his own. Players are backed up by teams of analysts these days.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Party Animal: This game demonstrates Fischer's genius! Spassky never seen Bxa4 game winning move, coming!
Premium Chessgames Member
  DrGridlock: A temptation for any kibitzer / annotater to avoid is "reverse engineering" commentary driven by the game outcome. That is, "player x won the game, therefore any move played by player x during the course of the game has a deep and profound meaning." This temptation seems to be greatest when kibitzing on Fischer games.

I came across this game in John Watson's section on the Nimzo-Indian opening in "Mastering the Chess Openings, Volume 2." Watson writes of the position after black's 7th move ... d6:

"This is the 'real' Hubner Variation, made famous by Hubner himself, but also by Fischer with his positionally devastating win over Spassky in their world championship match."

"Positionally devastating" seemed to me a game worth further study. However, upon further review (some extensive deep analysis with Komodo) a surprising finding is this:

<Black never has a positional eval in his favor until Spassky's blunder 27 Qc2.>

It's clearly time for us to re-think how we remember this game, and in particular to remember it more as a "blunder" than as "positionally devastating." Along this re-thinking, we need to re-examine Petrosianic's suggestion that the Gligoric / Mecking 13 o-o and 14 f5 are "improvements" on Spassky's gameplay. Komodo finds a .37 eval for Spassky's fxe5 continuation, and a -.03 eval for Gligoric's "improvement" (which is a curious eval difference for an improvement).

Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Shortly after this game my real chesslife started.
Jan-01-17  RookFile: So where's the analysis. Is it a secret?
Premium Chessgames Member
  DrGridlock: There is the prior claim that,

<White is significantly worse, possibly lost, even after 27. Qb1 or Qf3. It's just that the strategic problems with White's position exceed Stockfish's horizon.>

There is no line that I can find to back up this claim. There seems to be an claim that White's e-pawn is a weakness which black can attack, but I can find no plan to attack White's e-pawn.

After 27 Qb1 by white:

Boris Spassky - Robert James Fischer

click for larger view

What I find are lines like this one:

1. = (0.07):
28.Bd2 Kg8
29.Be3 g4
30.g3 Nh3+
31.Kf1 Bd7
32.Ke1 Qf6
33.Be2 Qg6

Black's pieces merely "dither" around. At some point, one of his pieces or pawns is going to have to move (in Bronstein's terminology) "across the equator." How he can do this Komodo cannot find.

Jan-01-17  RookFile: The one minor annoyance for black is that b6 needs to be defended. The queen would rather be attacking. Black can address that by trotting his king over to the queenside - let's say a7 - and then the queen and pawns and powerful knight can press forward on the kingside. As you can imagine, this may take 15 moves to implement, but it is a clear plan.
Premium Chessgames Member
  DrGridlock: Noting all the positional features:

(i) there is one passed pawn in the game - and it is White's d-pawn.

(ii) Black's b-pawn can never advance.

(iii) Black has a pawn majority on the kingside, but it's not clear how he can ever create a passed-pawn out of that: he can advance either his g-pawn or his h-pawn, but say he advances his g-pawn to g3. White does not exchange, but advances his h-pawn to h-3, and the pawn structure is locked.

(iv) If White has a weak e-pawn, black's e-pawn is equally weak. With two bishops, White will always have one bishop to defend his e-pawn, and one to attack black's e-pawn. Black is very in the squares from which his bishop can attack White's e-pawn.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <tamar....Had Fischer chosen to play in 75, he would have had to revamp all his openings, because his ideas, while new, had flaws that came to light when countless masters experimented with them....>

The reason Fischer switched openings and adopted new ones in 1972 was his respect for the Soviet analytical team and their capabilities, much as he loathed their methods--he was fortunate to hold the game played before this, and never again adopted the variation employed in that game.

Jan-01-17  RookFile: Let's think schematically, like Capa used to do. Let's just magically pick black's king up and put it on c7. (c7 might be preferable to a7 to ensure white's d pawn isn't going anywhere.)

We'll just assume a position that looks like this, after both sides have shifted wood:

click for larger view

I let Stockfish run for a couple of minutes, it's showing an advantage of roughly -0.5 to -0.6 for black. Apparently, the first committment by black (crossing the equator) is the move ...g4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  DrGridlock: <Rookfile>

If I run Komodo on your position, I get this line:

... h5
Bf2 Qf6
h3 g4
hxg4 Bxg4
Bxg4 hxg4

New game

click for larger view

Which Komodo evaluates as -.07.

Note that Black's pawn majority on the king-side has been converted to two doubled pawns on the g-file, opposed by White's single pawn on the g-file. None of these pawns are going anywhere in an endgame.

Sometimes, more important than an evaluation in these positions is an examination of the continuation. Does have Black have a line which advances towards a winning position?

In my mind, the key to finding winning chances for Black are two:

(i) attack and win White's e-pawn

(ii) convert black's king-side pawn majority into a passed pawn.

Unless someone can demonstrate a line which advances one of those two strategic goals, I'll have a hard time believing that Black, "is winning" after 27 Qb1

Jan-02-17  alphamaster: I think the right plan is to attack the e pawn with 3 pieces when White can defend it with only two. Maybe Black must bring his Knight at d6 to attack both weak pawns and of course his King at Queen side. Anyway Black must not exchange his strong Bishop for White's bad bishop. So Kommodo's plan is wrong. According to Fischer this was his best game in the match.
Jan-02-17  ZonszeinP: Spassky wasn't his own self in the first half of this match. Something similar happened to him against Kochnoi in 1977. He was never ready to play against players who started the battle even before the first move was made on the board
Jan-02-17  RookFile: It's a miserable position for white. Black is the one making the plans, white just gets to react to them. It may not be lost for white but black is definitely the one playing for the win.
Jan-02-17  ZonszeinP: 11-f4 is an ambitious move..
A novelty at the time
Jan-02-17  RookFile: Yep. Perfectly logical too - let's open the position for the two bishops and all. ...Ng6 was terrific by Fischer.
Jan-03-17  ZonszeinP: Yes!
Strong and (I understand) played almost instantly
Mar-30-17  Vyrak: Would you like to tell me, an ignorant, why is Ba4 winning
Premium Chessgames Member
  ZZpatzer: <Vyrak> if Qxa4, then 28...Qxe4 and mate soon after. if 28. Qd2, then 28...Bxd1 29. Qxd1 Qxe4 29. Qd2 Nd3 with -5.15 according to Shredder
Apr-09-17  ZonszeinP: This game is a typical example in this match,
That Spassky was not playing at his normal level
Aug-28-17  seriyvolk911: What if were 28.Bh5?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: <seriyvolk911: What if were 28.Bh5?> 28..Bxc2 29 Bxg6 Nxg6 and black is a piece ahead.
Sep-30-17  ewan14: 1977 - How did Korchnoi start the battle against Spassky before a game was played ?

By defecting?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 10)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
from outplayer's favorite games III by outplayer
Game 97: Nimzo-Indian Defence
from Garry Kasparov - Part One: Revolution in the 70s by Verivus
World champion blunders
by TigerG
Game 527
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
d4 : Nimzo-Indian Defense : Hubner.Rubinstein Va
by ISeth
Game 112
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
by Adoryn
48.The Doubled Pawn
from Modern Chess Strategy II by Ludek Pachman by Bidibulle
Black's queen+knight is stronger than White's queen+bishop.
from Material Imbalances by vikinx
NID Huebner Main Line (E41) 0-1 Annihilating deflection stroke
from Spearheads (Batteries w/a Q) Prod Fredthebear by fredthebear
Benko78's favorite games
by Benko78
from Great worldchampionship games by Portusboy
by selfmate
Great example Nimzo opening
from Example Games by Kingpatzer
Simple Chess - 11
from Ghuzultyy's favorite games/books/videos by Ghuzultyy
BobgJ's favorite games
by BobgJ
binand's favorite games
by binand
from fischer best games by brager
8 (Reinvent but with small blunder)
from 25 Learned games by fran2k
by gmlisowitz
plus 97 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC