Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
"Crime and Punishment" (game of the day Jul-22-10)
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972)  ·  Sicilian Defense: Najdorf. Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 51 times; par: 36 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
sac: 23.Qc3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the and buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-28-13  The Rocket: It may be his only "legit" win, but he sure beat him down. Fischer was made to look like a punk.
Mar-29-13  Petrosianic: <When confronted with the popular idea that decisions on the chessboard teach something about decisions in life, he wasn't buying and dismissed it with "Wooden pieces, wooden decisions".>

If I've heard that quote, I don't remember. I think Petrosian did a college thesis (he went back to school after becoming world champion), about Logic and Chess, but I've never seen it.

I don't think the moves of the game teach you much about real life decisions, but in general the game has some lessons about objectivity. You can say that a move is good without believing it but if it's bad and you play it, you might lose whether you admit it's bad or not.

But chessplayers don't always learn the lesson, and for proof of that take any message board. Players, even good ones sometimes spout blatant untruths and deny the nose on their face rather than admit an error. You can't pay chess that way and they don't. But they don't apply the lesson about truth on the board to truth off the board.

Mar-30-13  TheFocus: <I think Petrosian did a college thesis (he went back to school after becoming world champion), about Logic and Chess, but I've never seen it.>

It was later published in book form. I have a copy of it. Not so easy to find. It is a nice read.

I once offered to re-print it here at <CG>, but never did. Too much typing.

Mar-31-13  The Rocket: Kasparov voiced in a 2000 documentary, that chess and real life decisions are strictly separated. Apparently he felt very differently when retired and writing the book: "How life imitates chess".

I think the younger Kasparov was right, the older one simply wanting to make money, and I suppose and nothing better to do. Because to equate a board game with any real life problems is retarded. No connection with logic in chess and real life, apart from the generality's(of which we did not need chess to know of).

Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: Accidental chess talent hasn't been good enough to get you to the top for decades now (since Capablanca at least); you have to study the work of other masters and understand it thoroughly. So chess skill is the focused ability of an entire intellect, and logically, if skill at chess had much to do with skill at life, you would expect masters to be unusually good at life skills as well: interpersonal relations, love, friendship, health and lifestyle choices, career decisions.

I don't find that this theory describes top masters especially well, certainly not as well as the idea that chess skill is an unnatural obsession that happens to be attractive to a relatively common mindset. Some sufferers are far enough gone that they post essays on life and psychology as comments to old chess games.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Rookiepawn: Well, we will never know whether Fischer would have beaten Karpov had he tried to, truth is: he lost against Karpov, simply because he refused to play, which in my opinion is the worst way of losing. He surely deprived chess of many interest games.

Chess implies, as any competition sport, the responsability of showing up and demostrate you are the best.

This is not being anti-Fischer, who was an exceptional player, it is just fact.

Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: After 13.Kh1

click for larger view

Rybka 4.1 x64:

[-0.05] d=28 13...Bd7 14.Nb1 Qb4 15.Qe3 Ne7 16.a3 Qa4 17.Nc3 Qc6 18.Na5 Qc5 19.Qxc5 dxc5 20.Nxb7 Nc6 21.Rab1 Nd4 22.Rfd1 Nxe2 23.Nxe2 Ba4 24.Rb2 Bc6 25.Nc3 f5 26.Na5 Bxe4 27.Nxe4 fxe4 28.Rb7 h4

May-19-13  RookFile: I think RV's analysis shows that Fischer had a bad day for this game. Certainly his opening judgement was vindicated and his results overall with the poisoned pawn Sicilian were exceptional.
May-19-13  Olavi: In a practical game an attacking player would be unlikely to take the b7 pawn. Nei suggests 17.c4 Rc8 18.Nc3 Qc6 19.Rab1, possibly Spassky's intention as Nei was one of the seconds.
May-16-14  Llew: to say that his overall results were exceptional is a gross understatement - this game is Fischer's ONLY loss(!) in the PP variation. definitely a bad day for greatest of all time
May-16-14  Petrosianic: Technically, Fischer had one other Poisoned Pawn Loss. Against Geller, but Fischer was playing White in that game.

This is his only loss with the variation as Black because he played it so seldom, and, until 1972, only against weaker players. Other than Spassky, Fischer played the line against Parma (+1-0=2), Bilek, Tringov, Mazzoni, and Kavalek. The Kavalek game (a draw) is the most interesting game of that bunch.

May-16-14  Howard: Which Geller game was that ?
May-16-14  SimonWebbsTiger: Fischer-Geller, Monte Carlo 1967.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Petrosianic> <This is his only loss with the variation as Black because he played it so seldom, and, until 1972, only against weaker players.>

He didn't get a lot of chances. Zero chances against super-GMs, with the exception of Spassky. After he started playing the Poison Pawn in 1961, the database shows just 14 games with the position after 7.f4, including three from the 1972 match.

May-16-14  Petrosianic: He got a lot of chances, but his main defense was 7...Be7. Qb6 was one of the secondary lines. Were it the primary line, one would assume there'd be a loss or two prior to 1972.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Petrosianic: He got a lot of chances, but his main defense was 7...Be7.>

Until 1961, yes. He played 7....Be7 a lot in the 50s. But of the 14 games I referenced 1961-1972, 9 were poison pawns (and one of the ...Be7 games transposed to the PPV).

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: There was a running battle with Gligoric in 7....Be7 until Fischer surprised his friend by responding 1....e5 to 1.e4 one day (Gligoric vs Fischer, 1960); thereafter, Gliga opened 1.d4 in their games as White and gave his redoubtable opponent a lot of trouble.
Aug-22-14  ChessYouGood: Good to see dominating play by the superior player, Boris, who had enough faith in his ability to remain competing
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <ChessYouGood: Good to see dominating play by the superior player, Boris....>

Great sense of humour.

<....who had enough faith in his ability to remain competing>

Sure he did--trouble was, after losing the thirteenth game in a titanic battle, he drove his challenger to the wall and could still win no game after this one.

If you consider two games won outright of twenty played, against seven losses, evidence that that player is the stronger, best of luck. You must have been a brilliant debater in your day.

Aug-22-14  Howard: Perhaps what ChessYouGood actually meant was that despite being down by three points going into the 11th game, Spassky nevertheless steeled himself and won.

I'll add this comment---when Spassky jumped to a 2-0 lead, a lot of people no doubt thought that it would be an arduous task for Fischer to overcome that deficit but little was anyone to know...........that for the remainder of the match, Spassky was to win only ONE more game--period !

Be honest---how many people could have anticipated that fact at the time ?

Aug-22-14  Petrosianic: <Be honest---how many people could have anticipated that fact at the time ?>

Suspected it, maybe. Predicted it, probably not. The same thing happened in 1963. After winning Game 1, who would have predicted that Botvinnik would only win one more game? Not many. But you sometimes get extreme results in even a long match, so I doubt anyone was flabbergasted either.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Might be better for us to stick to facts than to take excursions into the thought process of someone who is obviously lacking in knowledge of these great champions.
Aug-25-14  coldsweat: Spassky was a great chess player, the reigning world champion, and this game shows him being strong and creative over the board.

I love his firm refusal to trade pieces with Fischer, which Bobby was desperately trying to make him do. In this, he kept the initiative, and his opponent on his heels.

I love seeing fully developed engagements like this, with pawns advanced deep into enemy territory. Through move 22 there had been only a couple of minor exchanges!

When Boris seemingly sacrificed his Bishop with his twenty-third move, I almost wet my pants! Later, I got the feeling that his 27.Qf6! stunned the beast from Brooklyn.

He outplayed his brash challenger on his own turf, just as he had done to Spassky a few games earlier.

How boring computer-generated games are, at least to me, compared to the creativity of humans struggling against one another such as is displayed here!

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: 'Beast From Brooklyn' is an appellation describing Fischer which, I must confess, never occurred to me.
Aug-26-14  Petrosianic: <When Boris seemingly sacrificed his Bishop with his twenty-third move, I almost wet my pants!>

We really didn't need to know that. Especially since for the players themselves, the game was already over by that point. What did you expect? 23. Qxb5 Bxb5, and White has both Bishop and Exchange hanging?

If Fischer had still had any thought at all of holding the game, why 24...h3, rather than Qxf1+, at least getting a Rook for the Queen instead of giving it up for nothing. When you were soiling yourself, the players were already just going through the motions. The really exciting part had happened earlier.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. Don't post personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Boris Spassky's Best Games
by KingG
Bobby Fischer
by akatombo
The Continuation of Best Games Ever
by dull2vivid
Fischer vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
The famous Fischer poisoned pawn game.
from How to fight the Sicilian by Calchexas
"Spassky loves Fischer's Queen"
from Spassky The Legend by CharlieLuciano
Bobby Fischer: My 30 Memorable Games 1968-1972
by Runemaster
Boris Spassky (1937-)
from Player of the day: notable game III by nikolaas
Najdorf, Poisoned Pawn
by GoY
spassky 1
from emilio martinez's favorite games by emilio martinez
randejong's favorite games
by randejong
Snatching away the queen in Fischer's favorite Poisoned Pawn.
from The 10 Greatest Games Of Boris Spassky by FischerSpasskyGuy
Decisive World Championship Games II
by FaradayBach
Game #11
from Fischer-Spassky '72 by GPawn
by lazintata
B60- Sicilian
by cgrob
July 22: Crime and Punishment
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni
Capture of the Queen after her penetration to b2/b7.
from Middle game themes. by Dr. Siggy
Fisher v. Spassky 1972
by rwvatsc
Fresh's favorite games
by Fresh
plus 52 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies