chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
Fischer - Spassky (1992), Sveti Stefan & Belgrade YUG, rd 6, Sep-10
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense. Main Lines (D27)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-08-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: R plus 2p vs r is usually won-except that a RP and BP is a notorious draw-even without black's pawn.
Jun-09-03  ksadler: I once drew an ending with R+2P v. R (I had just the Rook) but both pawns were doubled on the a-file and my opponent gave me a lot of help :)
Aug-10-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Somebody today advanced the theory that Spassky threw this match. They obviously didn't play over this game.... Spassky tries very hard to win, and comes within the knife's edge of doing so.... a couple of mistakes, and Fischer is able to hold with a miracle defense.
Aug-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <The further course of the play confirmed my suppositions. When Spassky succeeded in creating real threats or dangerous counterplay, Fischer became flustered! And soon Spassky even took the lead, winning the 4th and 5th games. 'After two defeats,' the press wrote, 'for the first time Fischer did not come down for dinner in the restaurant of the Sveti Stefan Hotel (where he and Spassky had neighbouring tables), but ordered it in his room. The first peals of thunder were heard later. Before the start of the 6th game the match director went up to Spassky's seconds and in an apologetic tone he informed them: Fischer had asked them not to be allowed into the hall. As "compensation" his seconds would also not be allowed...'

In the 6th game the American found himself in an absolutely hopeless endgame and saved himself only thanks to some obvious technical mistakes by his opponent. It is terrible to imagine what might have happened with Bobby, had he lost a third successive game! Apparently Spassky was afraid of 'losing his opponent': he had said several times that he was playing this match for the sake of Fischer's return. And here he displayed genuine 'magnanimity': after this draw he lost three games in succession.> -- Kasparov, OMGP IV

Aug-12-07  capatal: <That seems exactly why Fischer chose simpatico Spassky>

"We need to change rooms, Boris."
Spassky,"Okay Bobby."

"None of your seconds can come, Boris."
Spassky,"Sure Bobby."

Bobby and Boris walk away... with Boris humming, " Hitch your wagon to a star..."

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Is that really possible? That Boris Spassky would actually throw three games in a row to appease Bobby in this match!? I doubt that Boris took the idea of his match with Bobby as a world championship match seriously, but to throw the games? Say it isn't so.
Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: While there's a certain man-bites-dog poetic justice in seeing Fischer on the receiving end of a wild, unsubstantiated claim for a change <(remember Fischer's own claim that every move of every game of every Karpov-Korchnoi and Karpov-Kasparov world championship match was pre-arranged)> still, that's what it is: a wild, unsubstantiated claim.

"Is that really possible?", you ask. Well sure, anything's possible. But if you ask "Is there any evidence whatsoever to support the idea?", then no, there's not.

Spassky's problem was psychological. Like Euwe in 1935, he was more concerned with his opponents problems than his own. I posted this the other day, but it bears repeating. From Jude Acers:

<Just a few words on Dr. Euwe that are not written today. He repeatedly offered to postpone games with Alekhine instantly the moment Alekhine appeared in poor condition or in a drunken stupor. The late Hans Kmoch told me: "Euwe was amazing, such a wonderful person and player at all times. During some 50 match games with Alekhine, despite all the pressure, the umpire did not ever have to be summoned once! Euwe had made up his mind to help Alekhine play chess and was sympathetic to him. It's really true that Alekhine wore a tuxedo in honor of Euwe the day that the world title was lost in 1935.">

We can applaud Euwe for his extraordinary sportsmanship, but at the same time, observe that when you're <too> focused on sympathizing with your opponent's problems, then it becomes difficult to play your best. Euwe and Spassky both, to a certain extent, put their opponents on a higher plane than themselves. If you're too focused on helping him, that makes it mentally difficult to turn around and try to crush him over the board.

The main difference between the two is that Euwe managed to eke out a victory anyway.

Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: The idea that Spassky lost any games on purpose is just absurd.

And by the way, there is another way to look at the game in front of us.

It is an example of <terrific defense> by Fischer! The way he coordinated his forces, on the knife's edge of losing, was remarkable. It is this type of terrific defense that Kasparov says characterizes <modern chess>.... and it seems that Fischer was quite capable of it!

This is a little bit better than resigning a drawn position like Kasparov did, wouldn't you say?

Dec-07-13  Owl: This looks like a win for Spassky he simply should eat the h pawn in the endgame
Aug-26-17  Jarman: After the match, Spassky wrote: "My general approach was not to think about the result of the match but how to help Bobby to restore his best form. The sixth game was critical. I was playing for a draw with white, but Bobby played so badly that I achieved a winning position. This would of course give me a real chance to lead with three wins and two draws! Could Bobby withstand such a situation? I did not know and this created a difficult psychological situation for me. I wanted to win the match but I was /afraid/ to win: Bobby could simply leave the match and abandon chess forever. This uncertainty prevented me from winning [the sixth game]. Bobby saved the game with his fighting spirit, and his creative capacity was restored. His self confidence returned and [from that point on] he began to play much better." (Endgame: Bobby Fischer's Remarkable Rise and Fall by Frank Brady, 2011)
Aug-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: three wins and two draws? Spassky never led in the second match, he was behind in the entire match, after losing the first game. What the H*ll is he talking about here?
Aug-27-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <HMM....Spassky never led in the second match, he was behind in the entire match, after losing the first game....>

Spassky indeed had back to back wins entering this game, his victory in the previous game being the only one he ever scored with the black pieces against Fischer in all their meetings.

Aug-27-17  Muttley101: <HeMateMe: three wins and two draws? Spassky never led in the second match, he was behind in the entire match, after losing the first game. What the H*ll is he talking about here?>

Its a good idea to check the facts before posting. After Fischer's win in game 1, there were 2 draws then Spassky won games 4 and 5. That is, Spassky was ahead 2-1 after 5 games, had won 2 games in a row, and in game 6 had a winning advantage.

That is, Spassky led in the seccond match.

"What the hell" is being discussed is that Spassky, having won 2 games on the trot, was concerned that Fischer may not be able to cope with a third loss. Spassky was looking at the bigger picture of trying to facilitate Fischer's return to chess, not simply winning a game. His conduct in 1972 shows this was characteristic of him.

Aug-27-17  ZonszeinP: And we all know that when you don't win a winning position...the amount of confidence in your opponent is doubled and your own game goes downhill
Aug-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I stand corrected on the early match numbers. Spassky seemed to lose steam later on, but did have a good early start.

Impossible for me to believe that Spassky was content to allow a draw if he had a winning position. They were playing for a real prize fund that neither had ever seen before: 2/3 of $5M. Certainly Spassky is a gentlemen and a great ambassador for the game but I can't believe any GM would not prosecute a winning position, especially with this much money on the line. It's not like chess professionals are awash in cash...

Aug-28-17  ughaibu: <Impossible for me to believe that Spassky was content to allow a draw if he had a winning position. They were playing for a real prize fund that neither had ever seen before: 2/3 of $5M.>

Personally, I would quite happily resign every game if I was going to be paid two million dollars.

Aug-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I think Spassky got $1.3M, Fischer got $3.7M. Not willing to finish a won game if you're going to get an extra $2M? seems unlikely. Perhaps he didn't really have a won game to begin with, so the point is moot?
Aug-28-17  Everett: Thank goodness for Spassky. Much respect to him.

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
QGA QX
from 50_Queenless middlegames by whiteshark
Match Fischer!
by amadeus
Game 6
from Spassky-Fischer Match 1992 by FischerSpasskyGuy
QGA QX
from 50_Queenless middlegames by Jaredfchess
QGA Classical Def. ML (D27) 1/2- On a knife's edge
from Violence QGA Fought Fredthebear QGA Violence by fredthebear
Match Spassky!
by amadeus
40_R+B:R+N_(die kleine UNgleichheit)
by whiteshark
QGA Classical Def. ML (D27)1/2- On a knife's edge
from Que up Fredthebear's Queen Pawn Game on Que by fredthebear
QGA Classical Def. ML (D27)1/2- On a knife's edge
from Some Special Games Found by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Fischer vs...... part 2
by TheTakenKing
1992 Match Game #6
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
QGA Classical Def. ML (D27)1/2- On a knife's edge
from SmyslovV and SpasskyB Games by fredthebear
QGA Classical Def. ML (D27) 1/2- On a knife's edge
from Game collection: -ER by fredthebear
Fischer-Spassky '92
by clifton
spassky retains lead 2/6
from fischer-spassky by kevin86


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC