Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Kotov vs Efim Geller
USSR Championship (1949), Moscow URS, rd 16, Nov-12
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Classical Fianchetto (E67)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 21 times; par: 51 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Kotov/Geller games
sac: 15...axb3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-09-03  ughaibu: In Geller's first appearance in the Soviet championship he finished 2nd. This game was awarded a brilliancy prize.
Aug-09-05  Rama: 18 ... Qa5 is very nice.
Mar-24-06  zev22407: Anothe masterpiece by geller.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Geller reckoned this as one of his best-ever games. Every black move seems to be an attack.

Bronstein thought that 27...b2 was stronger than bxa2.

Jul-21-08  notyetagm: <ughaibu: In Geller's first appearance in the Soviet championship he finished 2nd. This game was awarded a brilliancy prize.>

Indeed. A -STUPENDOUS- game by Geller.

Makes me want to learn how to play the KID. :-)

Jul-21-08  Petrosianic: <ughaibu> <In Geller's first appearance in the Soviet championship he finished 2nd.>

Yes, and this was also Petrosian's Soviet Championship debut, where he started off with a terminal case of stagefright and dropped his first 5 games.

Vasiliev's book on Petrosian, in discussing Geller's great result here, makes the cryptic comment that if Geller in his last round game had practiced one iota of the caution that Petrosian always did, that he'd have finished 1st. However, I haven't bothered to track down Geller's last round game to see how true that is.

Maybe that's something to do right now. I infer from the comment that Geller lost the game. And Geller lost four games in this tournament, while finishing a half point out of first: to Keres, Aronin, Sokolsky, and Lilienthal. Think I'll track down which it was and see how close Geller came to becoming Soviet Champion on his first attempt.

Jul-21-08  notyetagm: <Petrosianic: ... Maybe that's something to do right now. I infer from the comment that Geller lost the game. And he lost three games in this tournament: to Keres, Sokolsky, and Lilienthal. Think I'll track down which it was and see how close Geller came to becoming Soviet Champion on his first attempt.>

Geller's three 1949 USSR Championship losses that you mentioned:

Geller vs Keres, 1949
Geller vs Sokolsky, 1949
Lilienthal vs Geller, 1949

Jul-21-08  Petrosianic: He also lost to Kholmov (I misremembered, and said Aronin).

In fact, it looks like this might be the game in question:

Geller vs Kholmov, 1949

...judging from this comment:

<Kangaroo> <What a game! If Geller won it, he would have become the champion.>

It's also labeled Round 19, which would be the final one. Geller scored +10-4=5 in this tournament to finish a half point behind Smyslov and Bronstein. I'll have to have a closer look at this game.

Jul-21-08  notyetagm: Position after 37 ♗e4xg6?

click for larger view

With his last two moves (35 ... h7-h5, 36 ... h5-h4) Geller (Black) has setup a nasty little tactical surprise for White, which 37 ♗e4xg6? did nothing to prevent.

<<<Geller has noticed that the lineup of dark-squared Black e5-bishop and White e1-queen means that the g3-square is a <TACTICAL BASE> from which the Black e5-bishop would strike at the White e1-queen. So the g3-square is a <TACTICAL BASE> and the White e1-queen a <TACTICAL TARGET>.>>>

Geller knows that he must gain control of this g3-tactical base. So first he <COORDINATES HIS FORCES> on the crucial g3-square with 35 ... h7-h5 and 36 ... h5-h4.

Secondly, Geller knows that he must <CLEAR THE TACTICAL BASE> of its defenders. Here the g3-tactical base is defended by the White h2-pawn, which is already attacked by the Black b2-rook and defended only by the White h1-king, a tacitcal situation which screams for <REMOVAL OF THE GUARD> by <ILLUSORY PROTECTION>.

So Geller (Black) <REMOVES THE GUARD> of the g3-tactical base with 37 ... ♖b2xh2+!.

Position after 37 ... ♖b2xh2+! <remove the guard>

click for larger view

And after the forced 38 ♔h1x♖h2 ♗e5xg3+, Geller has realized his fantasy position of a <FORK> on the g3-square involving the Black e5-bishop and White e1-queen.

Position after 38 ♔h1x♖h2 ♗e5xg3+

click for larger view

Note how the Black g3-bishop needs the support of the Black h4-pawn, else White would simply play ♕e1x♗g3 or ♔h2x♗g3 and not lose material. Hence the real reason for the advance of the Black h-pawn is revealed: it did not mindlessly advance to "attack" the White h1-king, it advanced to support a <BISHOP FORK> on g3!

Ingenius tactical play by Geller.

Jul-22-08  notyetagm: <ughaibu: In Geller's first appearance in the Soviet championship he finished 2nd. This game was awarded a brilliancy prize.>

What a beautiful win this is by Geller.

Jul-22-08  notyetagm: Position after 25 ... c4-c3

click for larger view

Geller (Black) has the <BISHOP PAIR (♗♗)> and a pair of advanced <CONNECTED PASSERS> for a piece, clearly a winning position.

This game is so full of beautfiful tactical shots that no wonder it won a brilliancy prize.

Nov-30-10  notyetagm: Kotov vs Geller, 1949,

Nice prelude to a winning tactical shot:

35 ... h7-h5 it's coming

36 ... h5-h4 it's coming

37 ... ♖b2xh2+! bang! it's here!

<IMPORTANT!: notice how the advance of the h-pawn supports the occupation of the <TACTICAL BASE>, just like Fischer's 14 ♕d1-b3 supports the occupation of the d5-tactical base in Fischer vs P Lapiken, 1956 >

Jan-17-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: TACTICAL TARGET DETERMINES TACTICAL BASE!
Jun-18-11  qqdos: <ughaibu> <notyetagm> The Brilliancy Prize was awarded by the Konsomolskaya Pravda newspaper, however Botvinnik one of the judging panel, rather uncharitably, pointed out that the game was not faultless and hence could not be considered as one artistic whole - <source Geller's 1962 Autobiography, translated by Bernard Cafferty (1969)>. At one point during the game, Geller had written off his own chances when to his horror he suddenly saw that Kotov had a simple move 15.f4! (Botvinnik's suggestion) "which would win a pawn and leave me with a hopeless position unless I was prepared to give up a piece." Instead an unsuspecting Kotov made the obvious move 15.Nde2? allowing Geller to pounce "in a flash" with 15...axb3! sacrificing his knight. Later, at move 22. Kotov again missed f4 "essential" which Geller felt would have given White "drawing chances"!
Jul-12-11  LIFE Master AJ: One of the more brilliant games in the DB.

Hard to believe that its never been featured as a POTD ... or "The Game of The Day."

Jul-12-11  SimonWebbsTiger: @AJ

I agree. I wonder what Kotov thought when Geller played the star move.

Do you know the Russian for: "oh, crap" :o)

Dec-22-12  notyetagm: Game Collection: GELLER'S BEST GAMES
Dec-22-12  rilkefan: 22.e5 is equal or a bit better for white per stockfish. Black doesn't have time to take on e5 because his queenside pawns fall, and soon f4 holds it. Thus 17...b2 with a half-pawn edge was better.
Jul-06-15  saturn2: Does 37 Rg1 instead of Bxg6 hold for white? At least blacks blow Rxh2 seems not to work then. I played against Geller a simultan in 1983 or 1984 during which he won all the games.
Apr-25-18  Toribio3: Geller is truly a master of attack!
Apr-25-18  Olavi: Against 15.f4, mentioned by <qqdos> a while ago, Geller later suggested 15...axb3 also.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess Highlights of the 20th Century (2/3)
by rbaglini
Soviet School of Chess
by samsloan
Game #5
from King's Indian pioneers by keywiz84
KID. Classical Fianchetto (E67) 0-1 Brilliancy prize!
from Game collection: Zws by fredthebear
Energy encouraged
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
KID. Classical Fianchetto (E67) 0-1 Brilliancy prize!
from yRoundhouse Ruuks 4 by fredthebear
Chess Highlights of the 20th Century (2/3)
by 50movesaheadofyou
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 2
by 0ZeR0
38 Kh1xRh2 king cannot defend g3-square like h2-pawn replaces
King's Indian
by ALL
KID: Fianchetto Variation. Classical Fianchetto
from MKD's KID by MKD
USSR Championship 1949
by suenteus po 147
Game 149
from Soviet Chess Strategy (Suetin) by Qindarka
from howlwolf's favorite games by wtpy
estrategias 2 de suetin
from howlwolf's favorite games by howlwolf
DrChopper's good games
by DrChopper
37 ... Rb2xh2+! destroys White h2-pawn defender of g3-tact base
Energy encouraged
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC