chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Vasily Smyslov vs Efim Geller
USSR Championship (1955), Moscow URS, rd 7
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch. Closed Variation Main Line (E89)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 42 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Smyslov/Geller games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-04-02  ughaibu: Smyslov was another victim.
Dec-05-02  PVS: Geller played two matches with Smyslov and won them both. This game is the lone decisive game from the first, which was necessitated by the two having shared first place in the USSR championship that year. The second was a Candidates match in 1965, Geller won big +3=5. It seems Smyslov went wrong after 24Nxe4.
Dec-05-02  ughaibu: I get the impression that Smyslov lost track in the opening. h3 and g3 look horrible.
Dec-05-02  PVS: 11. h3 makes no sense, and 12. g3 is not much better. He needed to do something on the c-file.
Dec-30-04  PivotalAnorak: If 35. ♔f2 ♗f6 !
Apr-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Geller's account of this deciding playoff game, which made him the Soviet Champion:

<Although this variation is not considered disadvantageous to White I knew very well that Smyslov had never previously played it in serious play, and the type of game arising from it hardly suited his style. And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.

White's King was in danger and Smyslov played for simplifications, exchanging queens and hoping for an ending. By a temporary knight sacrifice, I succeeded in destroying White's defensive set-up and my rooks and bishops penetrated into his king's position. The attack grew in strength and faced with the threat of heavy material loss, Smyslov resigned. Victory!...>

Apr-02-08  xrt999: Beautiful game! After 29...Be5 you can amlost feel Smyslov's blood pressure rising as he is slowly being constricted to death.

All of black's pieces are harmoniously leering into white's confused space; black has the active bishop pair and controls the open c-file. White makes one feeble attempt to extricate himself from black's clutches and is crushed with pinpoint precision and efficiency by Grandmaster Geller.

Apr-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: <And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.>

Curious, since I've always thought 5. f3 virtually commits white to castling long later. Not in all variations, but in most.

Mar-24-09  parisattack: <<Although this variation is not considered disadvantageous to White I knew very well that Smyslov had never previously played it in serious play, and the type of game arising from it hardly suited his style. And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.

White's King was in danger and Smyslov played for simplifications, exchanging queens and hoping for an ending. By a temporary knight sacrifice, I succeeded in destroying White's defensive set-up and my rooks and bishops penetrated into his king's position. The attack grew in strength and faced with the threat of heavy material loss, Smyslov resigned. Victory!...> >

'Until Geller we didn't understand the King's Indian' - Botvinnik.

Geller one of the great Power Players of all time - Pillsbury-Keres-Geller-Stein...

Oct-07-09  Everett: <parisattack:
<'Until Geller we didn't understand the King's Indian' - Botvinnik>>

Classic! I guess Botvinnik never did quite understand what was going on with his games against Bronstein.

Oct-07-09  ughaibu: In 1951? Game 21 was the only kings indian, I think, Bronstein won.
Oct-13-09  Everett: I don't know the date of the Botvinnik quote, but he and Bronstein played 3 KIDs. Moreover, Bronstein and Boleslavsky were playing it consistently, with good results and "understanding" before Geller. Bronstein's famous wins came three years before 1949. So, Botvinnik seems to either be ignorant or, probably, being intentionally disrespectful.

Game Collection: King's Indian pioneers

Oct-13-09  WhiteRook48: 36 Kg3 Rxe1 37 Kxg4 RE4+
Oct-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  stoy: According to Bronstein's wife, her dying husband named Geller, not himself, as the greatest player of the KID!
Oct-13-09  Everett: <stoy> Coming from Bronstein, I believe it!

It's interesting that Spassky completely avoided Geller's KID in '65 and '68.

I certainly take no credit away from Geller. The quote from Botvinnik is a clear exaggeration, however.

Dec-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <PVS>This game is the lone decisive game from the first, which was necessitated by the two having shared first place in the USSR championship that year.

<FVS>,
The first 6 games of the play-off match were drawn.

Dec-25-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim Bartle> From vast experience of the Saemisch, I can tell you that White usually goes in for long castling.
Oct-30-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Everett> I believe you may be right with regards to Botvinnik's attempt to disrespect Bronstein with attributing the advent and great understanding of the King's Indian Defence to Geller.

I happen to be a King's Indian Defence practitioner and have learned this opening from Bronstein and Geller, in that order. Bronstein's understanding and employment of the King's Indian is well known. Geller, Tal, Fischer etc all played it later; albeit with almost the same depth of understanding as Bronstein (if perhaps not more, I don't know). But it is my sincere belief that the famous statement by Botvinnik was an insult to Bronstein.#

Oct-30-14  tranquilsimplicity: But then again I have to be truly honest and add that I adopted Geller's set ups that continue with ..Nd7 as opposed to Bronstein's ..Nc6. I play this defence la Geller.#
Nov-05-14  tranquilsimplicity: I have come across new information that has compelled me to revise my position stated in my penultimate post. Botvinnik once claimed that in his opinion, Geller was the strongest player in the world in the late 1960s. With that in mind, it is very possible that Botvinnik's assertion regarding the understanding of the King's Indian Defence pertaining to Geller's contribution may have been genuine. And therefore not an insult to Bronstein.#
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game #90
from The most beautiful games in chess 3 by keywiz84
Play-off, Game #7
from USSR Championship 1955 by Phony Benoni
Game #29
from King's Indian pioneers by keywiz84
Geller beats the world champions and pretenders
by ughaibu
Round 8
from Interesting Games by TheTakenKing
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Efim Geller's Best Games
by KingG
Game 95
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Game 70
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
Game 243
from number 3 by Frodo7
All decided by tactics
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
Chess as an art form. Part 1
by hatter81
Geller 1955 (probably the strongest USSR championship)
from Behind the Iron curtain by Open Defence
Power Chess - Geller
by Anatoly21
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 95
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by AdrianP
KID: Saemisch. Closed Variation. Main Line
from MKD's KID by MKD
Grandmaster Geller: The First Quarter Century
by Resignation Trap
All decided by tactics
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
24... Ne4
from The Best Chess Games (part 3) by Dr Esenville
plus 1 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC